Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  fuzzy lighting

3 Reasons to Keep Cameras Out of Prop 8′s Courtroom

As Judge Vaughn Walker weighs the option to allow television (and/or web) cameras in the court room for closing arguments on June 16, we’ve found at least three reasons why he should side with Prop 8′s defenders and keep them out.

• Ted Olson won’t have to worry about hair and make-up.
• Protect Marriage attorney Charles Cooper won’t have to worry about any embarrassing gaffes.
• Judge Walker can go naked under his robe. Or at least pantsless.


  • 2 Comments
    • s_b
      s_b

      How about if we keep them out so that the Supreme Court isn’t able to use them as a technicality to avoid ruling on the case?

      May 25, 2010 at 11:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SK
      SK

      I have found 4th one Chris Cooper won’t be embrassed on cameras when the judge hands Cooper’s head on a sliver platter.

      US Supreme WON’T rule on a decision “technicality” because they allowed a camera in closing arguments..

      May 26, 2010 at 12:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.