Comments on: A Graphic Description of Jim Carrey’s Gay Sex Scene

By: blake

blake — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:50:36 +0000

As a reason for lack of theatrical distribution, one “disquieting” sex scene is lame. Most producers would just reshoot the scene and make the original available for a DVD release.

The film’s producers have to want a theatrical release for the possibility that it would generate more money than a straight to DVD release. Hopefully, the film’s stars took reduced salaries otherwise, the producers are going to lose boatloads of money.

By: sal

sal — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:57:39 +0000

i wanna see it,it sounds dangerous lol

By: Nathan in Holland

Nathan in Holland — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:09:44 +0000

@Alan Down in Florida: I know plenty of men that dress like that. Some of them gay.

@Mark M: Please. I know trannies that are tops. First you complain about stereotypes and then you use one to dismiss how he is dressing? “Tops” or “Power tops” are stereotypes too.

@Bertie: Of course he’s doing it for press. He’s a celebrety, that’s what they do.

Personally I don’t care if it goes straight to video. I’ll just rent it then. It’ll be distributed though. Just it will be shown in Art Houses. I foresee record boxoffice sales in Art House cinemas in the coming month.

By: Bertie

Bertie — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:55:35 +0000

Jim Carrey is nuts — as is his girlfriend Jenny “I cured my indigo child’s autism” McCarthy.

He did a gay role – so he would get some press. any press.

By: Mark M

Mark M — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:21:44 +0000

I agree with Alan.. And.. as long as we are on sterotypes…. that is not how a top dresses. Certainly not a power top.

By: Alan down in Florida

Alan down in Florida — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:01 +0000

Could Jim Carrey look more like a stereotype than he does in that photo? One frame of film is bad enough, I can’t even imagine 90+ minutes of it. Someone should have told him real gay wins Oscars, caricature goes straight to video.