Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
the classroom

A Lesbian Public School Teacher Told Her 1st Graders She Was Getting Married. Time to FREAK OUT

female_teacher_334550a

We all know that homosexual marriage advocates want to institute their radical agenda to brainwash America’s school children. But so far, that’s just been a theory. Now, evidence!

Margaret C. Hemenway, writing for PFOX, says she’s the parent of a first-grader at Horace Mann Elementary, the public school in D.C., whose teacher dared tell the class that she was marrying another woman. And if they had questions, they were free to ask!

SEE?! GAY SEX IN THE CLASSROOM!

Most parents would not consider a Q&A session with first-graders about homosexual marriage as an “age-appropriate” discussion. After our daughter’s revelation, we lodged a complaint with Chancellor Rhee’s office, requesting an investigation, and asking what department in the DC Government we can appeal to for restoration of our child’s sense of innocence? We are still awaiting feedback from the school on whether there is a Teacher’s “Code of Conduct” and what D.C. policy is on “age appropriate” sexuality education. The only piece of information a D.C. official provided to us was an admission that the principal approved this lesson plan and failed to warn parents in advance. Obviously, the teacher knew this was controversial and sought “top cover” from her supervisor.

[...] When we raised a red flag over another sexuality discussion, “Good Touch, Bad Touch” taught in my son’s class at Mann two years ago, this principal pledged that parents would be given notice “way in advance.” This is a principal who does not keep her word, has a callous disregard for parental rights and religion, and has lost our trust and confidence.

Moreover, it’s all part of the homosexual conspiracy to queer America!

Our daughter also mentioned a book the teacher read aloud, “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” about two male “gay” guinea pigs, promoted by the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender Lobby for children. Since homosexual activists cannot reproduce their own children, recruitment to their cause (especially at a young age, before parents have raised such sensitive and controversial topics with their children) is essential to the political agenda of promoting homosexuality and “gay” marriage.

There lesbian teachers and their ilk must be stopped at all costs. But letting kids discuss “mommy and daddy” in the classroom? And asking them if they have “brothers and sisters”? Well, those are conversations about family, not sex.

(NB: The only “Margaret C. Hemenway” in D.C. that we turned up? She happens to be a former Congressional staffer for New Hampshire’s Sen. Robert Smith before becoming a defense policy analyst. We can’t confirm these are the same people.)

(via WCP)

By:           editor editor
On:           Dec 18, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
  • 11 Comments
    • FakeName
      FakeName

      “Since homosexual activists cannot reproduce their own children, recruitment to their cause … is essential to the political agenda of promoting homosexuality and “gay” marriage.”

      They literally have not updated the talking points since Anita Bryant in 1978. Although they do seem to have dropped the “semen is concentrated blood so homos are all vampires” line of chat, so at least that’s something.

      Dec 18, 2009 at 1:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • terrwill
      terrwill

      When we raised a red flag over another sexuality discussion, “Good Touch, Bad Touch” taught in my son’s class at Mann two years ago…..

      This really made us mad because once our son knew
      about “bad touching” it prevented us from dumping
      our son off at afterschool events at the local church…

      Dec 18, 2009 at 4:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mark
      Mark

      A heterosexual teacher announcing he/she is getting married wouldn’t raise an eyebrow of course…

      Dec 19, 2009 at 5:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      and asking what department in the DC Government we can appeal to for restoration of our child’s sense of innocence?

      Just keep telling your child about the stork, mommy and daddy.

      Hey, if those little kiddies can buy Santa Claus, miraculous conceptions, sky-pixies and a sky-daddy, they can buy the stork-story too! ;)

      Dec 19, 2009 at 3:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Pariah
      Pariah

      we should remove shildren from abusive religous environments. This preson is a loon.

      Dec 19, 2009 at 7:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Keith Kimmel
      Keith Kimmel

      More faith-based fear mongering/hate.

      Dec 20, 2009 at 2:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Schteve
      Schteve

      No. 3 · Mark, which is why gay parents seriously need to start registering complaints with schools whenever opposite marriage comes up. According to these religious nutjobs, I have every right to keep my child from reading about a man who marries a woman. It’s so controversial!

      Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Magnus67
      Magnus67

      While we’re at it, let’s ban all visibly pregnant teachers from the classroom so that the uncomfortable ideas of reproduction and insemination don’t interfere with the children’s lesson plans or cause unwanted conversations about how babies are made.

      Honestly, I bet the kids’ main concerns would be if their teacher was going to keep teaching after the wedding, or what she was planning on wearing. With ‘Mom’ raising such a ruckus, the kid is now learning that marriage is a BIG DEAL; and Mom has just turned a 3 minute conversation with the child into a half hour one. FAIL!

      Dec 21, 2009 at 1:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Seth
      Seth

      I don’t even think talking about marriage can be packaged with “sexual education” can it?

      Dec 21, 2009 at 3:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • tavdy79
      tavdy79

      @ FakeName: “Although they do seem to have dropped the “semen is concentrated blood so homos are all vampires” line of chat, so at least that’s something.”

      I don’t really get why they’d follow that line of reasoning anyway. Blood that full of hate tastes disgusting, it’s so bitter, so why they’d think we’d want to go anywhere near them is beyond me. Why would anyone drink sewage when there’s champagne on offer?

      Dec 21, 2009 at 4:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hyhybt
      hyhybt

      Be very suspicious of anyone with such strong objections to “Good Touch/Bad Touch.” Especially since (amazingly, considering its purpose) there’s nothing “sexually explicit” about it unless the children bring it up themselves.

      Dec 22, 2009 at 11:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     


    POPULAR ON QUEERTY


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.