Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

A New Look At Mapplethorpe

mapple1.jpg
Robert Mapplethorpe’s stunning and sexually-charged images started critics and conservatives. While some said his sexuality tainted his work, Sylvia Wolf claims the late artist’s identity as a gay man and as a photographer go hand-in-hand:

Within his first year of taking pictures, Mapplethorpe also began to explore his sexual attraction to men, trying to determine whether he was gay, straight or bisexual, and the Polaroid camera became an accomplice and an aid. As he embraced homosexuality, he made dozens of photographs of handsome young men gazing at the camera with sultry come-hither looks or staring past the photographer in states of suspended consciousness. For his subjects, being photographed by Mapplethorpe was often an erotic experience. For Robert, taking pictures was a means of seduction and a catalyst for sex.

May be should be taking more shots, huh?

[Image Source]

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Oct 23, 2007
Tagged: , , , ,
2 Comments

No. 1 · Rt. Rev. Dr. RES · Member · 444 comments

Robert Mapplethorpe had a tortured coming out process. His anger at all the proponents of homophobia, especially the Christian Church, found expression with urine and a crucifix. His death was a sad ending to such a tortured life.

Yet, I always find hate expressed in thought, word or deed is the true vulgarity. Using Christ to promote Christofacism is obscene. I find the homophobia of today, and especially the decades of his fame, was crying out for expression.

Christofascist theology is Pharisitical and not exemplary of the Christ whom we serve in our family. The bodily function it evokes in me is not urination but vomitus.

Posted: Oct 23, 2007 at 8:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Dave

Robert Mapplethorpe never did the infamous “piss Christ” photograph that the above person is writing about.

Robert Mapplethorpe was bisexual and not a gay man as he had both sexual and romantic attractions to both men and women. If he were gay he would only have had sexual attraction to men only which was not the case.

Posted: Dec 6, 2010 at 11:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.