Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

A Tale of 2 Jurisdictions: California Voters Can Decide Marriage Law, But D.C. Cannot

While the District of Columbia just decided that allowing the people to vote, via ballot initiative, on same-sex marriage would violate the city’s Human Rights Act — because popular vote should not decide civil rights — the State of California finds itself fielding five just-approved ballot measures to reverse Proposition 8, the ballot measure that last year let voters strip away marriage rights in the state. (To be clear, activists say there will only be a signature drive for Love Honor Cherish’s ballot initiative.) If there’s ever been a more clear reason why federal marriage rights are necessary, it is this situation: Some Americans can have their neighbors vote on their marriage, while others cannot.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Nov 18, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
1 Comment

No. 1 · KirilleXXI · Member · 46 comments

Unbelievable!
Why USA don’t have this Human Rights Act on the federal level? This would change so much! This is what people have been talking about for years: popular votes should not decide civil rights, especially if we’re talking about civil rights of minorities! All we need is federally recognized Human Rights Act! Unbelievable that this hasn’t been done yet in such a “progressive” country like USA!

Posted: Nov 18, 2009 at 2:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY