<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Afternoon Aural: Suzanne Vega</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kodekn</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27411</link>
		<dc:creator>kodekn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27411</guid>
		<description>EdWoody,

the song is from the album &#039;Solitude Standing&#039; which was released in 1987 (like it is said in the second sentence at the Wikipedia page you&#039;re referring to). On the album there are two versions of the song: first the a cappella which opens the album, and then the instrumental, which closes it. This was one of my favourite albums in 1987-88 and I listened to it a lot. It&#039;s still a beautiful album although like many albums from my past I rarely listen to it anymore.

Also it is said in the song&#039;s Wikipedia page that Vega&#039;s record company bought the DNA remix after it had made rounds in the clubs, and this was done because Vega liked the remix and didn&#039;t want go to court with copyright infringement. The DNA remix was pretty huge here in Europe when it was released, I remember hearing it everywhere.

And then the question asked by Queerty: what is the point of this song? (Apparently you are talking about the remix.) The original a cappella has got a nice poem-like moment-in-time quality to it, and of course Suzanne&#039;s voice brings its own charisma to it. The dance version... well, it sort of mixes two quite different elements in it: Suzanne Vega&#039;s bard-like traditional singer quality with modern electronic beats. One example of a bit of a same kind of contradicting was this huge hit &#039;Sadeness (Part 1)&#039; by Enigma in 1990:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ie-lihykN3k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EdWoody,</p>
<p>the song is from the album &#8216;Solitude Standing&#8217; which was released in 1987 (like it is said in the second sentence at the Wikipedia page you&#8217;re referring to). On the album there are two versions of the song: first the a cappella which opens the album, and then the instrumental, which closes it. This was one of my favourite albums in 1987-88 and I listened to it a lot. It&#8217;s still a beautiful album although like many albums from my past I rarely listen to it anymore.</p>
<p>Also it is said in the song&#8217;s Wikipedia page that Vega&#8217;s record company bought the DNA remix after it had made rounds in the clubs, and this was done because Vega liked the remix and didn&#8217;t want go to court with copyright infringement. The DNA remix was pretty huge here in Europe when it was released, I remember hearing it everywhere.</p>
<p>And then the question asked by Queerty: what is the point of this song? (Apparently you are talking about the remix.) The original a cappella has got a nice poem-like moment-in-time quality to it, and of course Suzanne&#8217;s voice brings its own charisma to it. The dance version&#8230; well, it sort of mixes two quite different elements in it: Suzanne Vega&#8217;s bard-like traditional singer quality with modern electronic beats. One example of a bit of a same kind of contradicting was this huge hit &#8216;Sadeness (Part 1)&#8217; by Enigma in 1990:</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ie-lihykN3k" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ie-lihykN3k</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick69</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27321</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27321</guid>
		<description>All I know, The dancer in the black shorts has got a pair of thighs on him. Lawd !! What I would do to have my face between those legs !!! Yum !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know, The dancer in the black shorts has got a pair of thighs on him. Lawd !! What I would do to have my face between those legs !!! Yum !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-side</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27266</link>
		<dc:creator>B-side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27266</guid>
		<description>&quot;Left of Center&quot; is the Suzanne Vega track to remember...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=iZNCnfS5SeY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Left of Center&#8221; is the Suzanne Vega track to remember&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=iZNCnfS5SeY" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=iZNCnfS5SeY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdWoody</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27260</link>
		<dc:creator>EdWoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27260</guid>
		<description>Oh Jesus, that was a hideous song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Jesus, that was a hideous song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelkins</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27232</link>
		<dc:creator>kelkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27232</guid>
		<description>for example: &quot;Gypsy Woman (She&#039;s Homeless)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for example: &#8220;Gypsy Woman (She&#8217;s Homeless)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdWoody</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27213</link>
		<dc:creator>EdWoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/music/afternoon-aural-suzanne-vega-20071105/#comment-27213</guid>
		<description>The original &quot;Tom&#039;s Diner&quot; track was completely a cappella, off the Solitude Standing album. IIRC, the remix was done by DNA without Vega&#039;s knowledge or permission. 

Also, Wikipedia says the original was released in 1981, and the remix in 1990. Neither of those is 1987. Not saying they&#039;re right and you&#039;re wrong, but something&#039;s wrong somewhere. 

Also accorpding to Wikipedia, the song is about looking at life through a pane of glass and never actually getting involved in it directly. Yes, putting that on a dance beat doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense, but since when has that stopped people from making dance remixes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original &#8220;Tom&#8217;s Diner&#8221; track was completely a cappella, off the Solitude Standing album. IIRC, the remix was done by DNA without Vega&#8217;s knowledge or permission. </p>
<p>Also, Wikipedia says the original was released in 1981, and the remix in 1990. Neither of those is 1987. Not saying they&#8217;re right and you&#8217;re wrong, but something&#8217;s wrong somewhere. </p>
<p>Also accorpding to Wikipedia, the song is about looking at life through a pane of glass and never actually getting involved in it directly. Yes, putting that on a dance beat doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense, but since when has that stopped people from making dance remixes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

