A $400 million provision that would have gone to HIV/ AIDS prevention programs was dropped from the Senate version of the economic stimulus package last Friday in an effort to appease Republicans. AIDS groups say that their programs can boost the economy, while Republican sentiment is that the funding ought to be elsewhere, if existing at all.
“Many of the Republicans are griping about the STD and AIDS funds being in the bill but not about the rest of this public health fund,” said Carl Schmid, director of federal affairs for the AIDS Institute, another national advocacy group.
“We support the fund, including the HIV part of it,” Schmid said. “We feel prevention is cost effective and saves money in the long run.”
He and Johnson said their respective groups also believe that including HIV and STD prevention funds in the president’s economic stimulus package can be justified as a legitimate economic stimulus provision because the funding would result in more health care related jobs.
“Health care is the largest single component of the gross national product of the nation,” Johnson said. “The economic impact of health-related activities, including HIV-related activity, is very substantial.”
Republican and conservative critics of the president’s stimulus plan have taken strong exception to that assessment. Some have said the plan was rapidly evolving into a “Christmas tree” bill, with liberal Democrats pressuring Obama to add many of their pet projects that the Bush administration had blocked over the past eight years."
Forget the Blowjob: Adam Lambert’s Album Is Good And Selling Gangbusters (27)
· scott ny'er says: ugh. It STILL says 600k. C’mon. I know you guys are rushing and this... »
Add Davey Wavey to the ‘Censored Sex Acts’ List! (12)
· Brian NJ says: I wish he would thicken his neck. Neck exercises are tricky, but he should do them.... »
· Qjersey says: I keep thinking that Davey Wavey is trying to audition for Bryan Safi’s job... »
Twilight Taylor Lautner Will Neither Confirm Nor Deny He’s a Big Homo (37)
· me says: It was funny on Conan O’Brien. Conan asked him something like, “Don’t you... »
· jason says: John, I tend to agree with you. I think most men are bisexual in orientation. However,... »
· John says: Chances are high he is bisexual, statistically speaking. Gaya and bisexuals often... »
Fine, We Admit It: Bebe Zahara Benet Is The Shit (13)
· Qjersey says: Michael Letterman = asshole The “straight” or “straight... »
SHOCK: John Ensign + Mark Sanford’s Religious ‘Family’ Is Backing Uganda’s Gay Hate (14)
· MarkD says: Beware the god heads! »
“The notion that there could be ‘legal consequences’ for airing two men kissing on network TV in 2009 is stunning” (5)
· Rainfish says: This is the same CBS (parent company – Viacom) who owns that milk-toast cable... »
Yeah … Stare at Taylor Lautner’s, Uh, Vitamin Water (72)
· Sophie Lautner says: Hi guys, Personally I love Taylor because he seems like someone who could be a... »
Makes sense. Putting monies for AIDS prevention, reseeding the National Mall, family planning clinics, repairs to the Tidal Basin, a National Endowment for the Arts funding increase and a subsidy to assist Hollywood production companies in buying film into an economic stimulus package strain credulity. Each of these items may be a good idea, but their effectiveness in jump starting the economy is questionable at best and they only give opponents of doing much of anything ammunition. The Dems need to quit ladling the pork in and stick to the subject at hand. Increased AIDS prevention funding is probably a good idea, but it needs to be considered on it own merits and not hidden away (and not hidden very effectively) in a bill that is supposed to get the US economy running again.
I agree with KSU499. Prevention needs to be funded but on it's on merits. AIDs prevention will not jump start an economy.