well that was interesting. Thanks.
now, i just want to know who actually DID create and approved of the redesign. Because it sucks. I almost always go to classic unless by accident. And I never click on morning goods now because it’s all about impressions.
i’m too stubborn. I think others just give in, hence the increased unique visitors.
· Flag
I dont think you are full of yourself Japhy! Think you’re doing a great job!
· Flag
Queerty now looks like that crazy, and defunct Gawker site, Sploid.
Do you really think everyone has a 36″ screen?
· Flag
I will always love Queerty because of the great info which is more important to me than design. The new version is a little too “busy” for me.
And this site to me gives off a friendlier and less bitchy vibe than Towleroad. They do a good job as well but I feel like I need to live in Chelsea and spend all summer on Fire Island when I skim that site. Their “cool kids” or “A Gay” angle gets old. Queerty has a better balance of personality.
· Flag
thanks for that — as a daily QRT browser, i like having a bit of context to put the site in. I also like the fresh ideas and the willingness to branch out and try new things — such as today’s weekend listings. I’d love for this to become a one-stop-shopping news/entertainment/community forum site for politically and socially open-minded gays. that may be a tall order for a one man operation, but still. Maybe i should confess that i found qrt while googling something like “gay news” or conservative gay news — a search that also turned up towelroad. i love the “no agenda…” policy! it’s refreshing since most gay news online presupposes total submission to the democratic party.
anyways, keep up the good work, you’re off to a great start japhy.
· Flag
Japhy needs to read his own response entitled “Why everyone hates redesigns.” It should provide sufficient explanation and evidence as to why many, including myself, think he is fairly rude and full of himself. I hope he is not actually like the person is his response.
· Flag
I love all the stuff you do Japhy, and you do have to have a thick skin in this bizz, tho the gay negs are minnows compared to some of the bs I see from straights on other venues. I like that actually, that straights are bitchier queens than gays.
You have great taste in MEN with your pix. As far as black or yellow dudes, umm, they would have to be off the chart exceptional to buzz my briefs, specially Asians, yikes, that just won’t happen.
Your writing is awesome, keep it up!!!
· Flag
that is not tom ford. He’s to skinny
· Flag
@CONFESSIONS OF A BAD BOY: I’m afraid it is Tom Ford. I remember the original photos in Out Magazine. He talks about it here, though I couldn’t find the actual photos:
http://out.com/exclusives.asp?page=1&id=23015
· Flag
re: female Morning Goods
The point is not just to find “hot ladies” on the internet, but hot ladies that cater more towards the lesbian gaze rather than the hetero male gaze. It would be great to see that on Queerty, say, once a month or so.
I remember twice in all the years I’ve been reading this site that women were used for morning goods. It was a nice gesture to your female readers. After all, your logo does seem to be lesbian-inclusive.
· Flag
@Erick: It’s hard to tell who posts what. They removed the bylines for some reason.
Rule of thumb, as far as I know, is that all the long, drawn out posts with big words seems to be Japhy and the gossipy and short posts and half naked men (Morning Goods the exception) is David.
No idea where “Cord Jefferson” fits in.
· Flag
I’ve been reading here since the beginning and I don’t think there’s ever been an actual female morning goods, ie. in place of the regular male one, but a couple of years ago there were a few female posts in addition to the daily male one. We were promised more, but they stopped. Considering the pic in this post is a typical straight male fantasy and nothing I find hot at all, that might be a good thing ;-) So while it is definitely easy to find pictures of women online, they’re aimed at straight men and not always what most lesbians (in my experience) find hot. Just like most so called lesbian porn is a huge turn off for actual lesbians.
@scott ny’er (formely scott): I’d take Rosie in a bikini over the cowgirl pic. And I’m not even joking.
· Flag
@Alexa: That was pretty interesting, at least to me. I always wondered what “type” Lesbian women find attractive. I know not everyone has a type but, I would think that a majority of Lesbians might find a certain type attractive. It’s just not the cowgirl slutty bar type, it seems.
You should mail the Queerty folk some examples. Just a suggestion. Maybe this?
· Flag
Japhy –
For a writing/editing staff of one, you produce an amazing amount of content and when I have a chance to visit your site, I enjoy the mix of content.
Regarding your “beef” with Lorri Jean for supposedly not agreeing to an interview with you. I still have a copy of our last email exchange in which I told you I would consider arranging such an interview. In fact, as you’ll recall, I’m the one who first suggested such an interview. Lorri has done interviews with every journalist who has requested one and has participated in several town hall meetings, at which anyone has been able to ask her a question.
But Japhy, you’ve shown no interest in the Center’s marriage equality work.
We’ve pitched you many times to make your readers aware of the opportunity to join hundreds of other volunteers for our door-to-door canvassing as we change hearts and minds about marriage equality and gather valuable data regarding messages that are effective in persuading people to support our freedom to marry.
The Center has been doing this work for more than 4 years – one day I’d love for you to accept our invitation to join us.
For those reading this, I’ll make a plug now: please join us for tomorrow’s (Saturday’s) canvass – details can be found at: http://www.VoteForEquality.org. We provide training before you start – it’s something anyone can do! In fact, right now you can find a story about our canvassing work at Advocate.com, featuring Kathy Griffin who volunteered with us last month.
I had also hoped you would have shared with your readers information about the Center’s video contest: http://www.lagaycenter.org/ProjectPushback, through which we hope to inspire the development of 60-second videos that have the potential to change hearts and minds in support of marriage equality. A fantastic panel of judges will award $2,500 to the creator of the video they select as the best.
If you now have an interest in not only asking Lorri whatever questions she can answer about the campaign, but sharing with your readers opportunities for them to get more involved in promoting marriage equality, let’s set it up!
And if you have written about the initiatives I’ve mentioned, and I somehow missed it, please accept my apology and let me know where I can find the stories.
Best,
JIM
JIM
· Flag
@hardmannyc: Yeah I don’t get the HX/Regent hate either outside of Andrew and David’s dislike…can’t we find something else to talk about because it makes you look more than a little petty
· Flag
@Lux8600:
“As far as black or yellow dudes, umm, they would have to be off the chart exceptional to buzz my briefs, specially Asians, yikes, that just won’t happen.”
You are an ignorant, racist piece of trash. I hope you choke on your stupidity.
Thanks for answering my questions Japhy, but i’m not buying them.
I don’t for one minute believe it’s that difficult to find hot black, ASIAN, and latino men for the morning goods. You can find plenty at the same places you steal all the other pics from. Yes, there definitely is aryan standard set by gay white photogs, but it doesn’t mean you have to accept it. I’ll send you some links.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt about not purposefully scapegoating black people as the sole arbiters of homo-repression, but the negative stories about black people here, far outweigh the positive imo, and only feed into the already pervasive racism in the gay community.
· Flag
@afrolito: I’ll agree with you on this. I also inwardly questioned the response about not being able to find hot black, Asian and Latino men. Queerty is just NOT looking hard enough. It’s definitely out there.
I don’t think Lux8600 is racist or ignorant. I think it has different tastes and unfortunately doesn’t know how to communicate effectively and properly without offense. It would have just been easy to say, I dig the morning goods the way it is, the others aren’t my type. But by Lux8600 saying “yikes”, there is a inference of disgust. So racist. Naw. Ignorant. Naw. Offensive and trash. Pretty much and quite possibly.
Just my 2 cents.
· Flag
@Kevin@BGFH: The angle threw me off. I belive you.
· Flag
@Michael W.: It depends on the behavior. I dated a guy who upon having sex said he does not date black guys. He was a racist. I have a friend who dated a guy who woke up from a nightmare saying that he thought my friend (a black man) had robbed him. I know another guy who when I told him I disagreed with his position on healthcare said my views were based on my race. Some are. Others may not be. There is no one rule, and certainly no subject to saying it does not exist in the gay community. I am not supporting Afrolito. Just keeping it real about whats out there.
· Flag
Re Find men of color
Yeah- that’s hard to believe. There are a ton of gay black sites out there if you google them. So the idea that you can’t find any is hard to believe. Same with Asians and Latinos. I am equal opportunity (I fuck any race) – if I am able to find them, then I find it hard to believe you cannot.
· Flag
@The Gay Numbers: You could be a straight guy on the dating scene with similar experiences involving women (including the tales from your straight buddies). So what? Those people were ignorant and insecure. It lends no credibility to the idea that there’s “pervasive racism” in the gay community.
I understand you may not agree with Afrolito, but your argument and attempt to “keep it real” was clearly meant to reinforce what he said. Let’s keep it really real by citing the overwhelming number examples in your lifetime of gays of all races being kind and endearing for the most part. Why can’t we keep it real with positive experiences you and some of your (I’m assuming black) friends have had with white gays which no doubt outnumber the bad by a large margin? Or would that be keeping it fake?
· Flag
Oh please, I’ve never had positive experiences AT ALL. And this is from someone who has 80% been with more white then black people due to circumstances beyond his control.
Damn, I have some stories!!
That are exactly with what GN is trying to say….but I’m an equal opp, so I don’t think the sun shines out of black gays and that’s were you see the light.
People are people.
· Flag
I was looking for this yesterday and ended up skipping right over this post because of the “ass-shots” as Swellster mentioned. I would appreciate it if these posts would have actual relevant accompanying pictures. Actually, I’d appreciate it if you just didn’t have ass-shots on queerty at all.
@ko:
I agree. Also, “…After all, your logo does seem to be lesbian-inclusive.” THANK YOU. This is a point I made in my post in the questions thread that was screened and deleted by queerty for god knows what reason. Queerty, you going to get back to me on that one? Emailed you last week…
@RainaWeather:
I have to say… Thonged cow girls with ridiculous make-up totally do it for me… Actually, no.
· Flag
I’m a regular visitor. I’ve been coming to this site for a few months now a few times a week. I don’t like the new design. I always click Classic Queerty. I’m young and it’s not like it’s hard for me to get used to a new design like some older people have hard time with change. I just don’t like it. Don’t like how it’s outlined and don’t like the way the pictures are set up. The fact that you have to click on a page number to see the next picture in a photo gallery vs. thumbnails where you can see all the pics on one page and click which ones you want to see up close. It’s a no brainer. It’s kind of like gay.com. People are still going to the website, but they lost a lot of people with the new design. Mostly non subscribers, but I know they lost a lot of subscribers as well. That’s why it’s so cheap to join now. A lot of chat rooms on gay.com that were once highly populated are now empty. The new design sucks. Enough about gay.com though. Point is if it’s not broke, don’t fix it. I like that Queerty still has classic queerty option though. So I don’t have to deal with the funky new design.
· Flag
how about getting a “lesbian correspondent” on staff, to pick some pictures of hot women to post?
It amuses me how uninformed many gay men can be about lesbian turn-ons. Queer women don’t have the same option, since we are continually bombarded with visuals designed to appeal to men.
Personally, my “type” is found at some point in the vast spectrum between the arched-back cowgirls and Rosie O’Donnell.
· Flag
w00t for Sufjen Stevens! His songs make me cry tears of joy as well as sorrow. And he’s very cute – especially when he has those wings on.
As for all the other things – redesign is okay, but I look forward to seeing the next iteration.
Keep up the good work! Queerty is spreading fast among the internet gays, and beyond!
· Flag
You R-O-C-K, Japhy!