Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
the shot

Amanda Lepore Is: Claudia Schiffer

1 2 3 4 5 Next »

THE SHOT — Amanda Lepore is already a model — and super in many ways. But dressed up as Claudia Schiffer, Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista, Karen Elson, and Nadja Auermann in TUSH magazine, and it’s inarguable. [via, via]

1 2 3 4 5 Next »
By:           editor editor
On:           May 17, 2010
Tagged: , , , , , ,
  • 7 Comments
    • Bob
      Bob

      Am I the only one that finds her looks to be very disturbing?

      May 17, 2010 at 10:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Fitz
      Fitz

      @Bob: I also find her very sad looking. She just looks so imhuman and unhealthy– though i know someone who knows someone who knows her, who swears that she is the nicest person on the planet.

      May 17, 2010 at 11:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • anonymouse
      anonymouse

      @Bob: @Fitz: Obviously only the surface matters to you guys. It’s funny how often we judge another person before we even get to know them. Who cares what she looks like?

      She’s beautiful and she owns it and she doesn’t give a shit.

      May 17, 2010 at 1:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      No. 3 ยท anonymouse
      @Bob: @Fitz: Obviously only the surface matters to you guys. It’s funny how often we judge another person before we even get to know them. Who cares what she looks like?
      ______________________

      Wrong post to spew that comment. It’s hilarious that you would make a comment about the surface mattering, since Amanda LePore has always been very up front about the thousands and thousands of dollars spend and the multiple oporations to get her to look like a human version of Jessica Rabbit. To scream about people only caring about the surface when discussing somebody who is famous for exactly that reason…well come on.

      May 17, 2010 at 2:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rikard
      Rikard

      @anonymouse: Schitzophrenic much? “who cares what she looks like” “she’s beautiful”. She is ESSENTIALLY about the surface. Surgicaly crafted at amplified proportion. This series of shots is even more specificaly about the surface, imitating other famous surfaces. I’m sure she’s a lovely human being, but you can do that on the radio, or as a kindergarten teacher. Her modified appearance is easy to catagorize as bizarre. She is shocking and unnatural. I’m pretty sure she is aware that most people are uncomfortable with it.

      May 17, 2010 at 2:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Fitz
      Fitz

      It just looks physically uncomfortable and unhealthy. A weird mix of emaciated and voluptuous. Check out those tiny skinny arms. Reminds me of when my grandmother was dying. But, like I said earlier– I do understand her to be a wonderful person, and God knows she struts it out there for every gay cause on the planet.

      May 17, 2010 at 2:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sam
      Sam

      Blackface = FAIL. C’mon Amanda. I know you know better. And I know you could do a fierce Naomi without having to stoop to that.

      May 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     


    POPULAR ON QUEERTY


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.