Queerty is better as a member
Makes sense, a gay guy in a long term monogamous relationship is a much lower risk for blood donations than say a single straight woman who is on the pill so doesn’t use condoms and has slept with different people over the last 6 months. Or a straight guy who is single and is out every weekend trying to get laid.
They are supposed to test the blood for all these diseases. So are they saying they really aren’t testing the blood? Because if they are screening all the blood then there is no reason to ban gay men. That said I do enjoy rubbing their noses in it when they ask me to donate blood at work.
@Polaro: If they are testing the blood I don’t see what the problem would be with gay men donating. I’m sure people with rare blood types have died because the blood they needed was not available. The FDA would rather let them die than to receive the blood from a gay man I guess.
@Polaro: When HIV/AIDS was first gaining notice testing procedures for it were not as precise as they are today. That lack of proper testing (and of course not really knowing what HIV was) resulted in thousands of potentially avoidable infections.
AT THE TIME IT WAS IMPLEMENTED – the ban made practical sense. That is no longer the case but as I’m sure we’re all aware Government is slow to affect change when that change does not have a financial incentive attached to it.
At this point any proponent for keeping the ban in place is doing so out of either sheer fear, or homophobia as our methods of screening blood donations has become incredibly more efficient and reliable.
Hopefully with the progression of synthetic blood we are nearing a day when it will be plentiful.
Until then the disgraceful treatment of us in spite of scientific progress is a testament to the idiots who don’t understand the simple mechanics of the world around us.
Allow gay men the right to donate blood, please sign the petition I created, and pass it around to as many people as you can?: http://www.change.org/petitions/u-s-food-and-drug-administration-allow-gay-men-to-donate-blood
Follow Us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/weallrequal
Between the existence of a window, however much smaller than it used to be, between infection and turning positive, and because every test ever designed will occasionally show a false negative, it makes sense to take risk into account. The trouble is their method.
On the other hand, so long as there are enough willing donors eligible under the current rules that *real* shortages (not just “we don’t have as much in stock as we like to keep,” but “these people needed blood and there was none to be had” shortages) are rare, there’s no incentive to lift the ban. Likewise with other stuff, like the prohibition on people who spent significant amounts of time in Britain just in case they somehow managed to catch Mad Cow, even though the disease is rare in actual British humans.)
Please log in to add your comment.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
PHOTOS: Broadway Gets Into Winter Burlesque With Calendar Girl
PHOTOS: Prohibition Returns to NYC With the Roaring New Twenty Something Party
PHOTOS: The Sundance Queer Preview — 2014 Edition
Long, Loose and Colorful: Fashion Trends For 2014
Most Talked About Model Interviews Of 2013