Because You Really Want to Hear From George W. Bush On World AIDS Day
Considered by many (read: leftists!) to be the only part of his legacy worth trumpeting, AIDS in Africa is George W. Bush’s pet topic in the Washington Post, a newspaper dedicated to letting right-wing radicals print revisionist history and hate sympathy. The best part of the piece is the footnote: “The writer was the 43rd president of the United States.” In case you did something stupid and confused him for the 40th president of the United States.[WaPo]
Bush funnelled more money to AIDS research than any other President (including Obama, so far). His work has helped save millions of lives, not just in Africa but in our own country too.
Like it or not (and believe me, its a tough pill to swallow), George W. Bush has done more for the gay community than any other US President in history.
· Flag
Funnelled is the correct term. Those $15 billion dollars attracted swindlers, corrupt officials, bogus groups, healthcare fat-cats, and religious conservatives like flies on sh-t.
Fighting AIDS in Africa profited religious groups who tought abstinence, fidelity, and refusing prostitution and homosexuality. We can thank Bush for Uganda.
· Flag
@Kev C: Name a government-funded program that doesn’t attract “swindlers, corrupt officials, bogus groups, healthcare fat-cats, and religious conservatives [as well as irreligious liberals or whatever the heck the opposite is] like flies on sh-t”. This is par for the course when it comes to government. Ugandan fanatics combined with a segment of American evangelicals, some horribly naive while others deliberately provocative, are responsible for the anti-gay atmosphere in Uganda. Bush is not. The fact remains that the Catholic Church ran more AIDS-groups in Africa before Bush sent funds and I’m willing to bet this remains true today. Criticize the man for what he really screwed up on without inventing crap.
· Flag
As with every president, there is good and bad. Both Bush and Obama disappointed us greatly. And, we each can state numerous reasons for such an assessment. But, at the same time, there are many things that each has done that has benefited this country. I’m thankful that Bush (and Kennedy) attempted to address our failing schools. Did it work perfectly? No. But, they attempted to address a serious problem in a bipartisan way. Bush was also a fearless leader, even though I disagree with many of his decisions, especially some decisions after 9/11. Obama, on the other hand, lacks leadership skills in many regards. But, he’s also attempted to address healthcare and LGBT issues. Have either been stellar successes? No. But, he’s attempted to make changes that we need. Bottom line, I’m thankful to Bush and Obama for some things – and am discouraged about other things. I could say the same about Reagan, Bush senior and Reagan. I won’t throw the baby out with the bathwater like most people. I want to see both sides. I guess that as an independent that’s where I find myself in politics.
· Flag
@CJ: oh CJ, actually GW Bush mucked up most education systems when “Every Child Left Behind” was foisted on the states as an unfunded mandate. Now instead of learning about a subject, every teacher in a public school that I know is complaining about “teaching to test.” We are not teaching our children how to learn or teaching them critical thinking. We are teaching many children to pass the tests so the teachers and school officials don’t get unfavorable reports on test results.
· Flag
I’ll give him that, just that. Still by authorizing water-boarding he is guilty of war crimes (see the US tries Japanese officers for water-boarding POW’s in WW2).