Comments on: Beliefnet Editor-in-Chief Asks if Richard Warren Should Be Fired For Supporting Same-Sex Relationships

By: Billy

Billy — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:04:43 +0000

It’s the 3rd to the last sentence that’s wacked.
Leonard, you should scan more before being such a prickly sut.

By: DavidOnTheMedia

DavidOnTheMedia — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:01:00 +0000

Leonard —– Maybe you should unravel those bunched up underwear.

By: Bruno

Bruno — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:44:04 +0000

@Stephen:

Warren came out in favor of prop 8. It was widely reported.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:48:40 +0000

Curious about the prop 8 comment. Is this fact or supposition? Generally Rick Warren doesn’t make known his personal political views.

By: Leonard

Leonard — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:08:39 +0000

@DavidOnTheMedia: Uh, the last sentence is a quote! Maybe you should endure elsewhere.

By: DavidOnTheMedia

DavidOnTheMedia — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:46:05 +0000

Last Sentence, the grammar is off as it is missing a word. Sloppy journalism with lazy proof reading is a major turn off we should not have to endure.

By: Brian

Brian — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:54:10 +0000

Joe — that’s exactly how I read this. When I was struggling with how to reconcile my deep religious faith with my sexuality, I found a lot of comfort, support and wisdom on beliefnet message boards. It’s an inclusive site, and Waldeman has always struck me as inclusive. I can’t imagine he supported Cizik’s firting, and I agree that it seems like he was just pointing out the hypocrisy here.

By: Joe Moag

Joe Moag — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:42:45 +0000

Maybe I am not reading this correctly, but from the letter, it seems that Waldman is pointing out that the fundies are hypocrites as to their puritanical and insane stance on gay rights, and that he taking more or a jab at them then he is at Warren or some level of potential “tolerance” (I use that word comparitvely) that Warren may be showing on this issue.

That’s how I am reading what this post is saying…