Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

Bill O’Relly Seeks Gay Segregation

billogay.jpg
Now that he’s blown the lid off lesbian gangs, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly took aim at the Padres‘ recent “gay pride” night.

In addition to inviting the homos, the San Diego-based baseballers promised free hats to children under 14, thus perpetuating the gay agenda: world domination. Describing the night as “social engineering,” O’Reilly slammed the Padres’ inclusion, which he described as “insensitive and dumb”. Would O’Reilly prefer queer concentration camps? Probably.

The Cup of Joe sent us over these screen caps. We’re waiting on video, but, to be honest, we’re not sure we want to hear it – reading the words makes us sick enough.
billo4.jpgbillogay3.jpgbillo41.jpg

Here’s the video. The sound’s not great and neither is the message:

By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Jul 12, 2007
Tagged: , , , , ,

  • 16 Comments
    • cjc
      cjc

      Imagine the children that would result from O’Reilly and Coulter—the horror, the horror!

      Jul 12, 2007 at 9:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Heather_L_James
      Heather_L_James

      I wonder if O’Reilly has ever attended a Broadway show. I assume he has, so how did he manage to avoid being infected with “gay”? Are some people immune to “gay”? If O’Reilly was around in the 40s and 50s he would have been among those that thought he could catch “black” from a drinking fountain or a lunch counter. And anyways it’s baseball, lesbians don’t have promiscuous sex, we mate for life! O’Reilly needs to save his outrage for the night they combine Pride with free opera glasses for anyone under fourteen at “Spring Awakening”. What a tool.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 9:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • kank
      kank

      So is he assuming that the only time that straight families will ever come into contact with gays is at these designated gay inclusive events? This report seems to rely on that tried and tested chesnut of if you are a man that likes men, then you must also like small boys. Why is the same logic never applied to hetrosexual males?

      Jul 12, 2007 at 9:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BillieXX
      BillieXX

      The O’Reilly is a pompous wind-bag who has convinced himself he is some guardian of the peoples.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 10:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      It’s apparent that the Repub party knows it has no chance of winning the next election and is looking for a new enemy. It ain’t Saddam. It never was Ossama. It ain’t illegal immigrants. It is the gay community. We are the new “red” menace. We will be vilified, scapegoated and made into monsters that the conservatives must save America from. The nest two years are going to be hell for us, what with hateful right-wingers and apathetic progressives, we’ll be lucky to come out of the election with our rights intact.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 10:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • gayleftborg
      gayleftborg

      Bill O’Reilly is just a loud little clover-plucking leprechaun and nothing more.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 10:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BillieXX
      BillieXX

      I despise the O’Reilly BUT mr/ms. gayleftborg your racist rant against the man is over the line. Take that crap somewhere else.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 10:52 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Martini-boy
      Martini-boy

      “at four or five, sir , american parents have the right not to have that conversation (about sex / sexual orientation) and not to have that conversation at a baseball park.”

      That’s what I would call irresponsible parenting.

      “Most gays did behave properly, and some were exhibitionist.”

      And he acknowledges that such a thing happens. So, what’s the deal?

      The only issues came from the conservative parents who have qualms about sex. If the parents, and society in general, were more open-minded about sexuality – and more willing to talk about the birds and the bees and all the other critters in between – such an uproar would have been muted down considerably.

      Oh, and p.s.: Mr. De Hart was a crappy argumentalist. He shamed me to the max. Anyone else cold have probably done a better job.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 11:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • urban bohemian
      urban bohemian

      Is he actually seeking real gay segregation or is he just covering the story (which has already been covered in detail by plenty of other outlets) with his usual right-wing slant? I only watched O’Reilly’s initial segment of video, and it looked like his usual crap.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 12:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Leigh
      Leigh

      Bill O’ Reilly is a joke.

      case in point: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6cT-JSfdzM

      A 16 year old came onto his show last month and totally owned him.

      Jul 12, 2007 at 9:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • kiveon
      kiveon

      Whats up with the man who is supposed to defend us. He did a half ass, sorry job. He let that loud mouth, stepfored wife say all kinds of crap about gays. He was pathetic!

      Jul 13, 2007 at 12:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dramanonymous
      dramanonymous

      “Daddy! Can I get TWO hats? One for me and one for the boyfriend I’m going to pick up at the forest preserve tonight since attending this baseball game is going to make me gay!”

      How O’Reilly is allowed to continue broadcasting confounds me.

      Jul 28, 2007 at 3:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    !-- Sailthru Horizon -->
    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.