Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
societal norms

Brazil Archbishop Is Losing Sleep Over Children ‘Spontaneously’ Turning Homosexual

It must be stressful to be Pope Benedict XVI. He has to decide every day whether to wear the red Prada loafer of the red Gucci slip-on. Also, all of his top-level priests around the world aren’t falling into line about THE EVILS OF HOMOSEXUALITY. Like that guy in Brazil, who’s going to stir shit up again.

Monsignor Dadeus Grings, seen here in not-so-recent photo, and what is allegedly not his mug shot, must get on the super secure line to the Vatican at once, because his conspiracy theory is true.

Monsignor Dadeus Grings, the archbishop of the southern Brazilian city of Porto Alegre, told a Brazilian bishops’ annual conference he believed paedophilia was on its way to becoming as accepted as homosexuality in society at large. “Society today is paedophile, that is the problem. So people easily fall into it. The fact it is being denounced is a positive sign,” he told the gathering on Tuesday, according to the O Globo newspaper.

Archbishop Grings, a 73-year-old priest with conservative views, said the gradual acceptance of homosexuality by the public was a precursor to a possible broad acceptance of paedophilia. “When sexuality is banalised it is clear that that can have an effect on all cases. Homosexuality is one case. Before, no one spoke of the homosexual. He was discriminated against,” he said. “When we start to say that they [homosexuals] have rights, rights to publicly demonstrate, in a short time paedophilia will also have rights.”

Soon newsstands will be stocking magazines like Playchild and Child Jocks and Boy Nudist (actually, that one is a real magazine), but for the love of all that is holy, please put them in shrinkwrap! To shield the children!

But that’s not all Grings had time to say.

The archbishop also said it was important to help children avoid homosexuality. ‘We know that the adolescent is spontaneously homosexual. Boys play with boys, girls play with girls. ‘If there is no proper guidance, this sticks. The question is – how are we going to educate our children to use a sexuality that is human and suitable?’

[AFP, Daily Mail]

By:           editor editor
On:           May 6, 2010
Tagged: , , , ,
  • 22 Comments
    • Cam
      Cam

      The only place where peodophiloia seems to be accepted is in this man’s own organization.

      May 6, 2010 at 9:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Fitz
      Fitz

      In case my husband reads this: all I want for Christmas is a lion.

      May 6, 2010 at 9:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      When does the Catholic Church finally absorb the message that it is well past time for it’s members to shut the fcuk up about anything having to do with the Gays or kiddie diddling???????

      May 6, 2010 at 10:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      Never fails. Some hater in the Catholic church will inevitably say something dumb about gays and then some haters in the gay community will follow-up by saying something equally dumb about Christians. And vice-versa. I think they call it the “vicious circle”.

      May 6, 2010 at 10:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MikenStL
      MikenStL

      “The question is – how are we going to educate our children to use a sexuality that is human and suitable?”

      LOL…. This is from someone who is celibate. I see he’s getting a lot of suitable use out of his.

      Also, I always love the leap in logic that if we allow two consenting adults to do something, the next step is a free-for-all child molestation-fest… I could ramble on, but I’ll stop.

      May 6, 2010 at 10:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SSCHIEFRSHA
      SSCHIEFRSHA

      I thought that is what the Priesthood secretly prays for LOL!

      May 6, 2010 at 12:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JudyS
      JudyS

      I’d assumed that Benedict’s private secretary, Gorgeous Georg – who shares the papal apartment with Benedict – would choose whether Benedict is to wear the red loafer of the red slip-on.

      http://www.kleinezeitung.at/nachrichten/leute/706383/index.do
      See photo – Georg apparently acting as Benedict’s “dresser”.

      From:
      http://www.houstonpress.com/2010-04-22/news/the-man-who-sued-the-pope/
      Shea writes about Ratzinger:
      “‘Who the hell is he trying to kid? This guy wears enough gold lamé in all of his vestments to suit up three New York drag queens. And furthermore, he’s given drag queens a bad name. I mean, look at his Palm Sunday vestments. They’re supposed to be red, but his are so gold-encrusted you can barely see the red. He’s got Gucci shoes and Prada glasses, and have you seen the boyfriend? He’s a hunk — a German tennis player and a jet fighter pilot, Gorgeous Georg. I’ve never seen a bishop who didn’t have an extraordinarily handsome private secretary.”

      The above is also quoted at:
      http://richarddawkins.net/articles/5500

      May 6, 2010 at 12:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SugNight
      SugNight

      Yet another Catholic tard…what a surprise. I’m with Fitz, time to bring back the lions.

      May 6, 2010 at 1:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lamar
      Lamar

      Why does he not accept there is no proven scientific link between paedophillia and homosexuality. This reminds of the time when the Catholic church hated on Gallileo when he proved that the Earth revolves around the Sun not the other way around (as a text in the Bible suggests), they were very ignorant and it took them centuries before they apologized for their ignorance and now it’ll probably take centuries for the Catholic church to admit the distinction between homosexuality and paedophillia.

      May 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bill Perdue
      Bill Perdue

      The ages of consent for sexual activity vary by jurisdiction across Europe. Most countries have an age of consent ranging from 14 to 17, the exceptions being the Vatican State, where the age of consent is twelve years old… wiki

      Helmut Graupner: Sexualität, Jugendschutz und Menschenrechte – Band 2, Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt – Berlin – Bern – New York -Paris – Wien 1997, ISBN 3-631-31790-5, Vatican State: pages 700ff

      [img]http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2008/12/89%20Inappropriate%20Stained%20Glass.jpg[/img]

      May 6, 2010 at 1:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • schlukitz
      schlukitz

      @Cam:

      Yep yep. The wolf crying wolf. LOL

      May 6, 2010 at 3:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hilarious
      Hilarious

      Sounds more like a guilty conscience to me. I think someone should be investigating this loser rather than listening to what he has to say.

      May 6, 2010 at 4:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      No. 9 · Bill Perdue wrote, “The ages of consent for sexual activity vary by jurisdiction across Europe. Most countries have an age of consent ranging from 14 to 17, the exceptions being the Vatican State, where the age of consent is twelve years old… wiki”

      According to http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message693559/pg1 (which seems to be some sort of discusion about why the age is 12 there): “This is a misnomer that involves an arcane law that was part of the old Codic Penal from Italy. In 1929 when the Vatican became a city state from the Lateran Treaty with Italy, it carried over the same civil law that was on the books in Italy at the time. At the time, the Italian Codic Penal had an age of consent of 12 years. It is an arcane law and is irrelevant to Vatican City. There are only 824 citizens in Vatican City. None of them are children. They are prelates and guards.Children have never been citizens of Vatican City. The arcane law of consent doesn’t apply to anyone because there are no children who are citizens.”

      It isn’t surprising that the Vatican has not gotten around to updating the law – after all, it took about 400 years for them to deign to reopen Galileo’s case.

      May 6, 2010 at 5:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      @B: And just to be safe, they won’t change the law……….ya never know when a 12 yo may wander into the vatican………….

      May 6, 2010 at 6:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bill Perdue
      Bill Perdue

      @B: Only someone truly arcane and irrelevant could fail to see the irony in the Vaticans age of consent.

      May 6, 2010 at 7:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      No. 13 · Bill Perdue wrote, “@B: Only someone truly arcane and irrelevant could fail to see the irony in the Vaticans age of consent.”

      Rather. some of us are not factually challenged and see the humor in seemingly embarrassing observations being merely the result of the glacial pace at which changes occurs in the Vatican.

      May 6, 2010 at 9:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bill Perdue
      Bill Perdue

      @B: Its not a question of a facts, little B, but of your use of facts to prop up whatevers sufficiently repugnant and dirty to excite your interest. The roman cults love of child raping or the Democrat/Republicans anti-gay stance, etc.

      May 6, 2010 at 9:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      No. 15 · Bill Perdue lied again by saying, “@B: Its not a question of a facts, little B, but of your use of facts to prop up whatevers sufficiently repugnant and dirty to excite your interest.”

      Liar – in No 11 I simply gave you a statement of the facts – how they ended up with an age of 12 due to the year in which the Lateran treaty was signed. I then suggested that they don’t get anything done very quickly, which is true, using the 400 years it took them to admit their mistake regarding Galileo as an example.

      Frankly, Perdue, you are a real slimeball – you continually post lies and slanderous statements whenever anyone disagrees with you in the slightest. I have nothing but contempt for you as a result of your behavior.

      May 6, 2010 at 10:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • chris
      chris

      well I’ve been raised catholic my whole life, catholic primary and secondary schools and I’m still gay…..so…did I guess my schools just lacked the in the guidance department.

      May 6, 2010 at 11:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bill Perdue
      Bill Perdue

      @B: It’s not really possible to slander someone like you, little B.

      May 6, 2010 at 11:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • bobito
      bobito

      I think it’s about time that they investigate ANYBODY who publicly insists that homosexuality leads to paedophilia, especially when the person putting forth this fallacious argument happens to be a member of the largest organized child molestation cover-up operation in the world.

      May 7, 2010 at 10:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ogre Magi
      Ogre Magi

      “sigh” So many Christians and so few Lions!

      May 7, 2010 at 11:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.