New Hampshire's State Senate narrowly passed a gay marriage bill in a 13-11 vote — but only after an amendment was added to the legislation that prohibits polygamy and marrying family members. The bill now goes to the desk of Gov. John Lynch, who has (frighteningly?) not indicated whether he will sign or veto. If he does sign? New Hampshire will become the FIFTH STATE TO LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE!
Megan Phelps Picked Her 5 Most Hated Americans and None of Them Are Lady Gaga (19)
· zack says: Add my voice to questioning Queerty’s methods. There is a legitimate place for... »
The Maryland Church That Dares Accept Homos Is Drawing the Wrath of Catholic Leaders (9)
· B says: No. 8 ยท Peter wrote, “B just a thought or two:: I think Maryland is quite a distance... »
· Peter says: B just a thought or two:: I think Maryland is quite a distance from Rome Helping Gays IS... »
Lt. Dan Choi Has Been Called … Back to Service? (20)
· QueerToday says: Remember when the gay liberation movement used to be against war and militarism?... »
How Did a Company That Offers Health Benefits For Gay Partners Wind Up on HRC’s List of Worst Companies? (20)
· S says: Want to know where your HRC contributions go? According to the most recently filed form 990,... »
· Julien says: @Julien: edit: nonsensical »
· Julien says: @Mark: Your comment seems vaguely non-sensical. How does that statistic show that... »
Why Are There a Bunch of Naked Men Playing Baseball in the Library of Congress? (6)
· Rev. Steve says: Wasn’t that the design on the dishes in The Bird Cage? »
Old Spice’s Marketing Strategy: Make Fun of Men Who Act Femme (26)
· Same Crap says: Another queerty post FAIL. You guys can’t even manufacture fauxtrage properly. »
Are Ellen DeGeneres and Simon Cowell Already Feuding Before Idol’s Live Show Starts? (7)
· Simon Fan says: PLease. These are all lies and stupid weak rumors. They’re getting along fine.... »
I'm a cynic and I think he'll veto it. But that's just me. If he does sign it, great. The 2012 campaign will be REALLY difficult for Republicans then…or, who knows, really easy?
@Alec:
The only reason I think Lynch won't veto or let it stand is because he's a Democrat. And that's not because I think he's a good person, but I think the pressure from within the Democratic party to pass SSM laws is starting to mount, and he just *might* be a little concerned about his future image?
If he vetoes this, though, he'll get every piece of wrath that should still be coming at Jim Douglas, who lucked out when his veto was overridden.
By the way, this amended bill has to go BACK to the NH House first, where it was barely passed in its original form, and was rejected in this form apparently earlier. Hopefully they'll push it back through and leave it up to Lynch.
sorry to repeat the same subjects on this blog, but HURRAY for Democracy. I am so tired of this debate….
It should be a no brainer in the 21st century to give people the same rights. It should have nothing to do with whether you like or dislike them personally, approve of their "lifestyle" etc. in the same way, theoretically, people are more or less free to practice the religion of their choice, have as many or no children as they like, choose where they live/work etc.
It is not as if vetoing this bill will stop Gay couples from existing, living together etc. That is the maddening part about the conservatives, Christee Crazees etc…. If you don't vote to put something on paper, it doesn't exist, in their minds apparently.
OMG! I didn't think they would pass it but they did. Great job everyone. NOW CALL and EMAIL Governor Lynch and encourage him to sign this legislation.
http://www.governor.nh.gov/contactus.htm
@Bruno: hey where can we read up on that? i didn't know they had rejected similar amendments earlier…
@daftpunkydavid:
You know, the article I originally saw that in has disappeared. I think it might have been erroneous. I'll see what I can dig up.
Never mind, I found it:
http://www.necn.com/Boston/New.....30698.html
It's very vague.
Note for those of you who are Mormons –
the NH bill does allow the gays to marry, but does specifically disallow polygamy…
Gays: 1. Mormons: 0.
I'm interested to hear about the debates that took place in the senate and/or the house of New Hampshire, anyone has a link?
John Lynch will not veto the bill. How do I know this? He is pulling the same act he did during Civil Unions. He shuts up and lets the speculation go on for a few days then finally comments.
John Lynch has approval ratings in the 70s and 80s. He knows damn well that as a Democrat from New England he is OBLIGATED to support this. Especially when Jodi Rell, Republican, from Connecticut flipped on this issue.
John Lynch is not going to enrage millions of LGBT donors, the Democratic caucus, progressives nationally, and his own primary voters by vetoing this. It would kill ANY CHANCE of running for President in 2016 when Iowa progressives WILL USE THIS ISSUE AS A LITMUS TEST.
I think the House will accept the New Hampshire Senate amendments to the bill (which appear to be good things).
Only REPUBLICAN Governors have previously vetoed marriage bills. Does New Hampshire's John Lynch want to be the first Democrat to do so?
Especially when marriage has nothing to do with religion?
I think it will be hysterical if in 2012, the two first Presidential primary states NH and IA both have gay marriage!!
@Mad Professsah: True. I hope you're right again.
@Captain Freedom: I also hope you're right, but so far the signs from Lynch haven't been encouraging. But then again I still have a feeling we may get a good ruling this time from the CA Supremes, so I guess anything can happen.
No matter what Lynch is thinking of doing now, we need to turn up the heat in NH to make sure he knows the consequences of vetoing marriage equality.
lynch must then become target number one if he vetoes it. we already have one lieberman- we don't need another dino soon to be independent ruining things.