Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  Fantasy Land

Bryan Fischer Thinks Hillary Will Be Our First Lesbian President

Bryan Fischer, the face (for want of a better word) of the American Family Association, is so obsessed with homosexuality that he sees it where it doesn’t exist. Latest case in point: Fischer has determined that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will be our first lesbian president.

How does Fischer know? Funny you should ask. It’s because he think it’s entirely possible that Hillary is having an affair with Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner’s wife. Also, speculation from Gennifer Flowers, who has made an industry out of allegations that she had a sexual relationship with Bill Clinton.

“The bottom line is that if Hillary Clinton becomes president in 2016 she will not only be our first female president she could be our first lesbian president,” Fischer said on his radio show.

Abedin was an aide to Clinton in the State Department and is considered part of her inner circle. If being part of a politician’s inner circle makes you a lesbian, then Washington, D.C. is the ultimate Dinah Shore Golf Tournament.

As for the Flowers, Fischer quotes her as saying that Bill once told her that Hillary is bisexual, which clearly is the same as having it printed in the Encylopedia Britannica.

We  have gotten a glimpse of the 2016 presidential campaign. It’s not going to be pretty.

 

By:           John Gallagher
On:           Sep 20, 2013
Tagged: , , , , ,

  • 56 Comments
    • queerty1958
      queerty1958

      Ms. Bryan Fischer makes some of the most ridiculous statements I’ve ever heard. It’s because to him it’s not meant as a joke. He is nothing but a dumbshit!

      Sep 20, 2013 at 7:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Eiswirth
      Eiswirth

      Next to you, Mr. Fischer, a moron is a Rhodes scholar.

      Sep 20, 2013 at 9:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John Doe
      John Doe

      Boy, I hope that gays & liberals don’t get all excited about voting for her if she does run. Sadly, I think that many will. The thing is, she is NO DIFFERENT than any other Democrat or Republican that is destroying this country. People need to stop voting for these same types of politicians and be willing throw their efforts into a third party. If we keep voting in corporate-owned politicians we’ll keep getting the same old thing. She’ll support the NSA spying, the same military policies, etc. When it comes down to MANY important issues, the Republicans and Democrats are just as corrupt and sold out. If you vote for a Republican or Democrat you essentially want more of the same.

      Sep 20, 2013 at 11:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BJ McFrisky
      BJ McFrisky

      @John Doe: Right on. Dem or Rep, politicians like HRC and BHO and GWB have only their own self-interests in mind. Time for some serious house-cleaning: White House, Congressional House, Senate, etc.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 9:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kangol
      Kangol

      I have to say I’m still shocked that Queerty, Huffington Post and other sites would blindly repeat what arch ho*mophobe Bryan Fischer has to say.

      Why? Would they do this for just anyone? Why even credit his h*ateful organization? He aims both to denigrate Hillary Rodham Clinton and LGBTQ people. It’s wrong. There’s nothing bad about being gay or lesbian, but Hillary Clinton isn’t either. She does support LGBTQ people, though.

      NEWS:
      Bryan Fischer will be the first self-lo*athing, violen*tly closeted, donk*ey-f*cking leader of a so-called Christian organization.

      My statement is as true as his is.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 11:28 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @John Doe:
      I could not agree more! The Dumbocrats have used us gays to further the destruction of our country! At least the Republicans make it clear that they hate us (some do not vocalize their support, and they are few and far betweem).
      Killary is a lying, traitorous bitch! Do not be fooled, fellow gays, with her bull$hit!

      Sep 21, 2013 at 1:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo
      2eo

      @Kangol: Actually anything that shows the true face of the christian fascist machine should be encouraged. They can not exist fairly, as their whole belief system relies on lies, deceit and evidently paedophilia.

      Where knowledge and equality is found, religion is not. We are fundamentally the enemy to them because we are real.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 1:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      Hillary Clinton: Commander in Queef

      Sep 21, 2013 at 2:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      Way to go for speaking out against the 2-party system charade. I hope ya’ll follow the work of Free & Equal

      @ John Doe
      @ BJ McFrisky
      @ Wilbready

      Sep 21, 2013 at 3:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • rdujetz
      rdujetz

      @Wilbready: @Wilbready: Watch something besides Fox News, you moron.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 4:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • rdujetz
      rdujetz

      Fischer probably whacks off at the thought of this.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 4:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      @jeff4justice: I sympathize. Without term limits, legitimate campaign finance reform, and the elimination of corporate rights and personhood, I doubt there will be any serious changes to the current order.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 4:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @rdujetz:
      Put down the koolaide and think for yourself! I happen to watch CNN and Fox and read the newspaper. I have many questions for that Bitch, ones that she refuses to even answer let alone debate. Four Americans are dead because of her and Obomber lied about this damn youtube video, yet you tell me to watch a different channel?
      #dumbass

      Sep 21, 2013 at 4:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo
      2eo

      @Wilbready: REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.

      REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.

      REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.

      REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.

      REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.REGION 3 REGION 3 REGION 3 FEMA ARE COMING, FEMA ARE COMING.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 5:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo
      2eo

      @Wilbready: “Put down the koolaide and think for yourself”

      ……

      “I happen to watch CNN and Fox and read the newspaper.”

      Ahahahahahahahahaha. That’s so idiotic I’m not sure it can even be parodied.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 5:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @2eo:
      It’s called being well rounded and intellectual. Just because you are gay, doesn’t make you a liberal. Not all conservatives are gay bashing assholes. I am not self loathing, but I have been raised to think for myself and not believe everything my government, or the media, say.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 5:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Charles175
      Charles175

      For several years now Alex Jones has been saying what some have recently discovered here and that is both parties are pretty much two sides of the same coin. We look at the big show that the politicians put on for public consumption without seeing the strings that to go to the hands of the controlling puppeteers. I remember the old wizard of Oz movie where Dorothy’s little Yorkie dog Toto pulls back the curtain while the small wizard says, “the great Oz has spoken!”. As far as that poor excuse of a very lax and loose sphincter, Bryan Fischer, I do not believe that his prediction will come true. Something tells me deep down that a Republican will step in, possibly Chris Christie out of New Jersey. At least he did signed a law banning ex-gay therapy in his State.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo
      2eo

      @Wilbready: I’m going to draw you a diagram.

      =====> *The point*

      :( *You*

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @Charles175:
      I agree that the two parties we have are just pulling the wool over our eyes. We have a president who stated he’d be the most transparent and it’s been lie after coverup after scandal.
      The main problem with a third party is the splitting of the electorate and that ensures the incumbent a clear victory.
      I like what Rand Paul is saying, just need to know if he is a true constitutionalist, or if he would block the LGBT efforts at equality. I have yet to hear back from his platform.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @2eo:
      *epic fail*

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Charles175
      Charles175

      @Wilbready: Do you mean Ron Paul?

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @Charles175:
      No, his son, Senator Rand Paul. I am for limited government and more in favor of personal freedoms. I suppose you could call me more of a Libertarian. Lower taxes, Strong national defense, even less world involvement. I like what Rand has been saying lately in the Senate and in the media.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 6:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      @Wilbready: Libertarianism is an intellectually bankrupt and vile excuse for private tyranny. I’ll pass. Likewise, limited government is a meaningless statement. Consider this: many who favor limited government say that anti-discrimination measures should be disallowed. Yet those same people also want the government to recognize their right to discriminate and remove “trespassers” who seek access to their business. It’s just a question of whose right you’re going to recognize – either your right to discriminate, or my right to be free from discrimination. It is not properly a question of whether you want “limited government.” The government is always already involved in legal questions.

      Also, what does “true” constitutionalism look like? Who is fit to arbitrate that question? Moreover, why is it meaningful to arrive at the “truth” of a document that was written in large part to perpetuate the power of a small moneyed elite and intentionally prevent democratic movements and social change? I don’t deny that it is an ingenious work far ahead of its time, and I certainly enjoy learning about it and reading about its history and nuances, but it’s about time we had an honest conversation about the Constitution that doesn’t elevate its text to biblical status.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      @Wilbready: I’ll throw you a bone though – I don’t like Obama any more than you do. It’s sad. He’s like a Citizen Kane character: he is a completely self-made man with the intellect and work ethic to do great things, yet he has become the very thing he railed against when he started: a consummate politician, which is to say a liar, a hypocrite, and a man without integrity. I guess kind of like Mitt Romney, just not a complete robot and corporate shill.

      It’s easy for me to criticize from my couch, and I don’t really know what he’s directly responsible for and what he’s not, let alone what he can and can’t change due to back room maneuvering and things I know nothing about. Yet one thing is clear: the more things change, the more the stay the same.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 2eo
      2eo

      @jwrappaport: I can’t help but feel it’s a few levels too advanced for him.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      *they

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @jwrappaport:
      Then what would YOU call someone who believes that we should all have the same rights and protection from those who wish to take those rights away? Also, by limited government, I mean that I don’t want them in my bedroom, my business or making ANY moral choices.
      I do think the Constitution is a living, breathing, document and doesn’t need to be “modernized”. It works just fine and has changed with the times better than any other governing document in world history. I do not agree that it was written to protect the elites who wrote it. They were ahead of their time, no matter what errors they may have made in their own lives.
      As for who is fit to arbitrate true constitutionalism, that is left to each citizen with their own ideals and view of what they find acceptable. Majority rules and protections were built in to protect those who do not have a voice.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @2eo:
      And you are certainly more intellectual than I, in your never to be humble (bloated) opinion of yourself.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      @Wilbready: You give me the unfortunate impression of someone who has read little (if anything) about the document you so venerate. Read Howard Zinn. Or Sanford Levinson. Or Charles Beard. It’s a complicated document fraught with contradictions, and as full of wisdom and prescience as it is with fear and avarice.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @jwrappaport:
      If you find it unsavory and filled with contempt, by all means, move to another country. On the other hand, if you like your freedoms to say whatever you wish without fear of retribution, stay right here and have a healthy, civli debate.
      As for me, I love this country, it’s founding and the document that makes it all possible. I fear religion and am happy and fortunate that I live where I can practice as I wish, which is nothing at all.
      My apologies for getting snippy, the Vicodin takes my pleasant, cheerful self, and turns it into a monster.

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ouragannyc
      ouragannyc

      @Wilbready: I can understand the frustration over the two party system but I have seen Mr.Paul voice his opposition to gay rights and gay marriage countless times. He associated gay marriage to the end of civilization. He expressed support for those who wish to discriminate against lgbt on the basis of their religious rights. He was the typical gay bashing republican. This can easily be found online. A paul presidencywould be a set back on lgbt rights thank God I don’t see it happening

      Sep 21, 2013 at 7:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @jwrappaport: Exactly. I’m amazed how many people fall for this “libertarian” gimmick which is just a lame cover for Ayn Rand’s long-discredited “greed is good” and “selfishness is virtue” philosphy that sounds seductive when you’re an immature teenager, but which you should know is BS when you’re a mature adult.

      Putting aside the fact that Rand Paul is not President-material given that he was an eye doctor just two years ago, he is just another objectivist/libertarian who doesn’t understand that government exists not just protect one’s own selfish desires but to protect the vulnerable. Hence his imaature, headscratching comments about how the Civil Rights Act went too far in not allowing businesses to discriminate in their public accomodations. Just what America needs: a President who thinks Jim Crow was okay because selfishness is a virtue. Except not.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 7:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jwrappaport
      jwrappaport

      @Wilbready: A healthy, civil debate includes claims that are advanced with externally verifiable justification and corresponding counterarguments that logically refute those claims or their proffered justification. It does not include a “love it or leave it” ultimatum. I don’t love countries. I love people. I love great art. I love ideas. There’s no question that we enjoy immense freedom in this country – indeed the freedom of speech is protected here as it is nowhere else in the world. But it certainly wasn’t designed that way, and if you read anything about the history of free speech (or really any freedom) in this country, you would see that clear as day.

      My claim is straightforward: the Constitution is a complicated and problematic document that, under the guise of federalism and other legal sophistry, empowered the federal government and the states to practice chattel slavery and ethnic cleansing (Indian “removal”) just as it protected certain speech by certain people. My justification cannot be more plain: de jure slavery until 1865 and de facto slavery until well into the 20th century; the systematic theft of Indian land from well before the Founding into the 19th century through outright deception, fraud, and force.

      I’m not going to be browbeaten by shame and guilt into loving this country. I love some of the ideas that it ostensibly stands for and the opportunities that I have. But I do not for one second think that our current state is some gift by the Founders or that we were birthed fully formed as Athena from the head of Zeus. Neither should you. What we have today was paid for by many lives we read little about in school. Our history is filled with unbelievable suffering perpetrated under the watchful eye of the law and often in its very name. I implore you to read about it sometime.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 9:09 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @ouragannyc: The Pauls are part of the 2-party system charade.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @jwrappaport: Youtube search: How 3rd Parties could win by 2014 and 2016

      As long as people keep voting for the same 2party system of lie-based war, in-effect slavery, poverty, pollution, and eradication of human rights then no nothing will change and the unprincipled voters will keep getting unprincipled politicians.

      Also, gays, women, and racial minorities will NEVER have equality riiiiiight?

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @jeff4justice: @Charles175: While there’s a lot of good info from Alex Jones he’s still a homophobe who dwells on problems and not solutions.

      If you don’t already, I urge you to follow the work of Free & equal and Ballot Access News.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:14 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @Wilbready: And the so-called conservatives fall into this same stupid self-fulling trap. In the end the voters become frog in boiling water as the 2-party system of lie-based war, in-effect slavery, poverty, pollution, and destruction of human rights ruins this nation.

      These tired excuses sound like gays who were afraid to try for full marriage equality. Setbacks may have happened but inevitable victory is clear now.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:17 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @jwrappaport: Libertarianism as with all statism is futile. Los Angeles has one of the biggest government in the world and yet just blocks away from those almighty government buildings is Skid Row where innumerable homeless people are living on the streets.

      I invite any so-called liberal or conservative to join me in some homeless outreach – the reaction I get to that offer is often crickets chirpping.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @BrandoPolo: greed is good = voting for the 2-party system charade. Voting for the 2-party system is voting for Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, Walmart, big pharma, big oil, etc…

      The Democrats are so worried about the poor that here in CA where they have a super majority they chose to ditch a Homeless Rights bill.

      How progressive.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BJ McFrisky
      BJ McFrisky

      Probably true. No straight woman would have tolerated Bill’s womanizing all these years unless she had something/someone to fall back on, like Huma (aka Senora Danger)—who also chooses to stand by her sexually uncontrollable mate. Something smells fishy here—and I’m not talking about lesbian sex.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 11:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @jeff4justice: This is all talk, less filling akin to ranting that “the 405 sucks, and so surface strees”. Okay, and? It is well known from long ago that the major parties are imperfect, but ranting how “the two party system sucks” is not a policy idea. Whining and complaining is easy — you have presented nothing in way of policies and ideas that indicate where third parties are less beholden to monied interests or more ready to govern palatably based on their patforms. Where’s the beef?

      Sep 22, 2013 at 1:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @BJ McFrisky: Spoken like washed-up gay dude who’s never met a straight woman. If you think straight women don’t put up with womanizing, your obvious social isolation issues are probably a bigger deal that your obvious problems with false heteronormative stereotyping.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 1:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • aquatarkus
      aquatarkus

      @jwrappaport: Very well spoken,and I agree with you totally…

      Sep 22, 2013 at 2:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @BrandoPolo: Does this make your rant more valuable LOL?

      By your logic you’ve offered no evidence that a society functioning under a peaceful, anarchist non-agression principle would be any better or worse than the clearly dysfunctional 2-party system charade.

      Or, you’ve also offered how continuing to vote for the same 2-party system charade will make things any better overall.

      Regarding your comment, “you have presented nothing in way of policies and ideas that indicate where third parties are less beholden to monied interests,” the Green Party does not take corporate donations (source: http://www.gp.org/register/).

      To learn more about alternative political parties I suggest you follow the work of Free & Equal and also Ballot Access News.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 3:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @jeff4justice: Correction: Or, you’ve also offered no evidence how continuing to vote for the same 2-party system charade will make things any better overall.

      Sep 22, 2013 at 3:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @jeff4justice: I’ve offered no evidence that a society functioning under a peaceful, anarchist non-agression principle would be any better or worse than the clearly dysfunctional 2-party system charade for the same reasons I’ve offered no evidence that buying everybody a teddy bear and a pony would make everybody happier. I actually do think a peacful non-aggressive society would function better than any other system. I also think world peace would be a nice thing to have — so what?

      The Green Party does not take corporate donations for the same reasons the Party in my Pants doesn’t. Last time I checked, lobbyists weren’t into throwing their money into a giant hole and setting it on fire LOL.

      I’m too busy holding the Democratic Party’s feet to the fire to dream pipe dreams — I do hope others continue to flog their favored horses though, as it is a free country.

      Sep 23, 2013 at 2:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GeriHew
      GeriHew

      I believe it is quite possible that Hillary Clinton will be the first female president of the USA. But I don’t think she will be the first bisexual president; that was quite possibly Abraham Lincoln.

      Sep 23, 2013 at 2:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • krystalkleer
      krystalkleer

      this moron has been pissy ever since someone dropped a house on his sister!…get over yer “scare” tactics Fischer…it ain’t a work’n!http://getoffmydress.blogspot.com/2013/09/this-is-what-i-do.html

      Sep 23, 2013 at 10:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • biscuit_batter
      biscuit_batter

      @John Doe: Well stated! let’s hope more and more people will wake up to the scam that is our political system.

      Sep 23, 2013 at 11:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @BrandoPolo: “I’m too busy holding the Democratic Party’s feet to the fire to dream pipe dreams.”

      Cute. Well good luck with the pipe dream that doing the same thing over and over expecting different results is anything other than futile. I’m sure you’ll have better luck than the Tea Party and Occupy.

      Just remember, woman, gays, and racial minorities will always be unequal and the King of England shall rule forever! All hail the 2-party system charade!

      Sep 23, 2013 at 3:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @jeff4justice: If by different result you mean urging Democrats into ending the Bush tax cuts for the rich, allowing gays to serve openly in the military, and enacting healthcare reform — yeah, I’m going to keep pressuring Democrats into making forward progress.

      Meanwhile, you keep on doing the same thing over and over with empty platitudes about third parties. I’m sure you’ll continue to acccomplish a fat lot of nothing.

      The political progress women, gays, and racial minorities have made have all been due to third parties. Whoops, except not. All hail talking loud and doing nothing!

      Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @BrandoPolo:
      Amen, brother! Third party idealists and voters have done NOTHING to advance the improvement of politics or enact ANY real change whatsoever! In fact, as I stated before, they only serve to split the vote (Tea Party, Green Party, black panther party)!

      Sep 23, 2013 at 6:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @BrandoPolo: And all those pipe dreams about black and women presidents are pretty wild do. Only white men have only ever done the job so how could a black man or woman ever do it?

      Way to go on the imaginary tax cuts, the right to join in lie-based endless war, and ObamaRomneyWellpointcare written by the insurance companies which I hope covers Stockholm Syndrome. Also way to go on NDAA, the expansion of the total surveillance society, feds backing out of control cops gone wild, the continued drug war, appointing Monsanto heads to the FDA and all this stuff: http://stpeteforpeace.org/factsheets/obama.html

      Sep 24, 2013 at 1:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      @Wilbready: Way to go backing a half a nation in poverty and endless lie-based war. What an accomplishment!

      Sep 24, 2013 at 1:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Wilbready
      Wilbready

      @jeff4justice:
      We all do what we feel is best, given our philosophies and strengths. I refuse to push for a third party, given their horrific track record. It takes much more than grandstanding on a LGBT webpage that promotes our vanities. Your ideas are grandeous at best and there is no upswell to carry them over the crest. I will vote for what I believe in and not for what you think I am a party to.
      Thank you.
      P.S. Johnson started this “War on Poverty” how many decades ago? What has changed? Obama has made it much worse with his disasterous economics. As Reagan once stated, “A rising tide, raises all boats”. Tax cuts, as you and the liveral media call them, benefit far more than the govenrment taxing the earners to pay for the takers. As Margaret Thantcher once said, “Comunism works until you run out of other people’s money”.

      Sep 24, 2013 at 2:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BrandoPolo
      BrandoPolo

      @jeff4justice: How could a black man or woman ever do it? By working within the two-party system, of course. Thank you for pointing out yet another thing the Democratic Party has accomplished that a third party never could.

      Way to go on the nonexistent third party accomplishment — I’ll take the imperfect, incremental changes accomplished in real life over the __________________________ accomplished by third parties any day. You can save the conspiracy theorist “fact sheets” for the Lyndon LaRouche crowd.

      Sep 24, 2013 at 2:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.