<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burning Questions: McCain Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorVP</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41697</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorVP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41697</guid>
		<description>Cindy McCain is a beer bottling heiress zillionaire.  And, if she weren&#039;t dressed, made-up and coiffed so harshly, she&#039;d be beautiful.  So she ought to be royally pissed, to be treated so casually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy McCain is a beer bottling heiress zillionaire.  And, if she weren&#8217;t dressed, made-up and coiffed so harshly, she&#8217;d be beautiful.  So she ought to be royally pissed, to be treated so casually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41588</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41588</guid>
		<description>Todd
Right.  Cindy looks reptillian up close.  It&#039;s the eyes.  I will say one thing for Hillary, she has good makeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd<br />
Right.  Cindy looks reptillian up close.  It&#8217;s the eyes.  I will say one thing for Hillary, she has good makeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41561</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41561</guid>
		<description>Cindy McCain needs low lights bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy McCain needs low lights bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emb</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41537</link>
		<dc:creator>emb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41537</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, Jack Jett, you&#039;d look that way too if you had to see McCain naked on a regular basis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, Jack Jett, you&#8217;d look that way too if you had to see McCain naked on a regular basis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jett</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41509</guid>
		<description>Rick

That is funny!

Cindy McCain always looks like someone just cut the rankest fart ..right in front of her.  I bet she has never touched her own pussy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick</p>
<p>That is funny!</p>
<p>Cindy McCain always looks like someone just cut the rankest fart ..right in front of her.  I bet she has never touched her own pussy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41502</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41502</guid>
		<description>on another note, the woman in question looks like actress faith ford on a bender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on another note, the woman in question looks like actress faith ford on a bender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emb</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41501</link>
		<dc:creator>emb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41501</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right, Jack Jett--had Obama or Clinton been caught being similarly snuggly with a lobbyist (regardless of possible &quot;romantic&quot; aspects, the use of which word in the media strikes me as profoundly Victorian, particularly given the full-frontal treatment Bill Clinton received in the press: no one ever, to my recollection, referred to the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as &quot;romantic&quot;), they&#039;d be pilloried, hanged, drawn and quartered by now. But because it&#039;s avuncular old straight-talking maverick McCain, the media&#039;s eyebrow is raised at the Times and its motives instead of McCain&#039;s obviously unethical (and, if the &quot;romantic&quot; aspect is true, physically nauseating) shenanigans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Jack Jett&#8211;had Obama or Clinton been caught being similarly snuggly with a lobbyist (regardless of possible &#8220;romantic&#8221; aspects, the use of which word in the media strikes me as profoundly Victorian, particularly given the full-frontal treatment Bill Clinton received in the press: no one ever, to my recollection, referred to the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as &#8220;romantic&#8221;), they&#8217;d be pilloried, hanged, drawn and quartered by now. But because it&#8217;s avuncular old straight-talking maverick McCain, the media&#8217;s eyebrow is raised at the Times and its motives instead of McCain&#8217;s obviously unethical (and, if the &#8220;romantic&#8221; aspect is true, physically nauseating) shenanigans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jett</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41498</guid>
		<description>Not even I would spit fuck John McCain with two sacks.

The media is playing this story way down, which gives you a sign of things to come.  CNN and MSNBC are claiming it is a smear campaign by the NY Times.  

If it were Obama or Clinton, it would be a 24/7 news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even I would spit fuck John McCain with two sacks.</p>
<p>The media is playing this story way down, which gives you a sign of things to come.  CNN and MSNBC are claiming it is a smear campaign by the NY Times.  </p>
<p>If it were Obama or Clinton, it would be a 24/7 news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41480</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41480</guid>
		<description>McCain is probably spreading the story himself so he appears more virile and youthful.  Whatever, yawn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is probably spreading the story himself so he appears more virile and youthful.  Whatever, yawn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalePhoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41476</link>
		<dc:creator>PalePhoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41476</guid>
		<description>Obama, Clinton, McCain = He-Man, She-Ra, Skeletor

Sad, really. To quote to contemporary philosopher P. W. Hilton, &quot;Hottie becomes nottie&quot; (or just &#039;naughty,&#039; if you think WALNUTS! really got any action out of the deal).

http://www.xmere.com/forums/index.php?act=attach&amp;type=post&amp;id=1296</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama, Clinton, McCain = He-Man, She-Ra, Skeletor</p>
<p>Sad, really. To quote to contemporary philosopher P. W. Hilton, &#8220;Hottie becomes nottie&#8221; (or just &#8216;naughty,&#8217; if you think WALNUTS! really got any action out of the deal).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xmere.com/forums/index.php?act=attach&#038;type=post&#038;id=1296" rel="nofollow">http://www.xmere.com/forums/in.....38;id=1296</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seitan-on-a-stick</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41451</link>
		<dc:creator>seitan-on-a-stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/burning-questions-mccain-edition-20080221/#comment-41451</guid>
		<description>Vicki Iseman! Vicki Iseman! Vicki Iseman! McCain is Toast!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki Iseman! Vicki Iseman! Vicki Iseman! McCain is Toast!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

