
President Bush and his cronies stuck by their evil ways today. White House spokesman Tony Fratto toed the anti-gay party line and informed the press that Bush Administration plans to veto Congress' proposed hate crime laws:
The qualifications [in the bill] are so broad that virtually any crime involving a homosexual individual has potential to have hate crimes elements. The proposals they're talking about are not sufficiently narrow.
"Not sufficietly narrow? What do they want, specifications on sexual role and penis size?
No doubt the White House has been listening to Family Research Council, Rick Scarborough and other self-righteous folk who claim the laws will hinder free speech. President Nixon's former aide turned penal preacher, Chuck Colson scoffs at the law:
The bill is not about crime prevention or even civil rights. It's about outlawing peaceful speech — speech that asserts that homosexual behavior is morally wrong.
Oh, yeah, because "God hates fags" and "Shit stabbers burn in hell" qualify as peaceful. What's with these people? Don't they own a dictionary?
Sigh….
Great…A shit for brains president and a congress that lack the balls to do anything about it.
So what does our straight gay leader Joe Solomese say about it? Not very effective some might say.
He needs a good spitless buttfucking by one of the hypocritical black evangelist who have climbed on the right wing bandwagon forgetting that they TOO HAVE BEEN victims of hate crimes.
Fuck George, Laura and those worthless pieces of shit he calls daughters.
jack jett
But don't forget to not vote at all, or throw your vote away on Kucinich or I Have Several Extra Teeth If Anyone's Interested Gravel, or run with the sucker vote for Guiliani, because, well, Hiwwary and Bawack and John John aren't going to be persuaded by the hissy fits of Matt Foreman, et al. because they aren't politically suicidal enough to attempt to trump every other issue, e.g., thousands still dying in Iraq, for a spit in the ocean endorsement of gay marriage.
"When there's nothing left to burn, you've got to set yourself on fire"
This gives me pride in my Canadian residency.
Well maybe we should just create a national past time of beating the shit out of billionaires and and their spoilt children, and see how that works?
This "Uniter of the People" needs to look up what that term is suppose to mean and start living up to it. He's been the biggest DIVIDER of this nation since the on-set of the Civil War.
[...] Now we'll see if the president will veto the defense appropriations bill to which the MSA is attached, as he has threatened to do. [...]
[...] passage yesterday. He also "urges" President Bush to sign the bill, which he vowed to veto: This vote was about who we are as Americans and whether this nation is going to live up to its [...]
[...] Bush could sign the recently-passed federal hate crime laws to protect citizens. Will he do that? Probably not. Why? Because he's relevant. During a press conference yesterday, dear old Bush told [...]
[...] of Defense authorization bill, President Bush will have ten days to sign or veto the measure. We all know how that one's going to work out. Nov 13, 2007 · Link · Respond Related Posts • 11/13/07: Retired Navy [...]
[...] protect other people's children. The future seemed bright this year. Yes, President Bush had vowed to veto the legislation, which passed in the Senate, but House democrats tacked hate crimes onto the Defense Authorization [...]
[...] strategy aside, we all know Bush is going to veto the hate crimes bill. He's said it time and time again. This [...]