"But They're Manolo Blah-Nik's!"
 

ht_afiyet_071205_ssh-1.jpg
You may have heard that Spanish shoe designer Manolo Blahnik will expand his empire with a men's line. We're not sure that's the best idea. Nor does men.style.com executive editor Tyler Thoreson:

I wouldn't wear them. I can't imagine guys wearing them. They're of limited appeal, I think. He's a master cobbler, and so you probably won't find a better made pair of shoes anywhere, but the style isn't going to be for everyone.

Indeed. The only people we can see in those puppies are horribly rich, horribly tacky homos and, possibly, an overzealous, over-primped twink.

Blahnik attempts to deflect criticism by pointing to his horrendous creations' "craftsmanship". His pleas haven't convinced What Not To Wear's Clinton Kelly: "This is not about craftsmanship, it's about, 'Hey look what I have on that you don't have the balls to wear.'" And we all know that's what short shorts are for, not blue suede slingbacks.

Comments (14)

No. 1 · WWH

So tacky.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 4:13 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Shabaka

Ugh!I saw a man wearing slingbacks a while ago at the airport in Montreal and they looked nice but these for some reason…Big no-no!

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 4:35 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · hells kitchen guy

reminds me of that great line from Phil. Story: You have to be rich as a Lord to live in a dump like this.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 4:45 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Walt Whitman

I think he's been making women's shoes too long. Those aren't gay, they're girly.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 7:41 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 5 · SeaFlood

… I think they're cute.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 9:48 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 6 · they look as cheesy

…as the women's shoes that Carrie Bradshaw wears on Sex and the City…give me a break.

Posted: Dec 8, 2007 at 2:20 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Nitesurf

Prepare to be mocked mercilessly if you dare to step out in public with these shoes.

Posted: Dec 8, 2007 at 5:16 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 8 · Gregg

Fugly.

Posted: Dec 8, 2007 at 12:25 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 9 · Miss Understood

Who cares. Some people like to have fun with their clothing. Big deal. I'd wear them… if I got them for free and my toes weren't so ugly.

Posted: Dec 8, 2007 at 1:21 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 10 · sexyback1983

I've seen some of the range that will hit our shops soon and from what I saw they were nice, they obviously choose the most outlandish pair for this pic

Posted: Dec 8, 2007 at 9:25 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 11 · fanboi

What could you possibly wear those with?

Posted: Dec 9, 2007 at 2:12 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Gregg

fanboi - I can picture a foppish, middle-aged, gay fashion-slave wearing these with overpriced white linen pants and an equally overpriced gauzy, printed, silk button down shirt. Finish off with overpriced designer sunglasses. Display in an "exclusive" tropical locale, accessorize with a colorful drink in a martini glass and a scornful yet immobilized-by-botox expression. Hair implants optional.

But perhaps I'm being judgmental.

Posted: Dec 9, 2007 at 9:08 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Alice

So, Gregg, what you're trying to say is .. Elton John?? :)

Posted: Dec 10, 2007 at 10:21 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Miss Understood

I absolutely LOVE foppish, middle-aged, gay fashion slaves! They are a hoot. What I wouldn't give for a a night on the town with (the late) Charles Nelson Reilly. What I can't stand is people who pick others apart because of their clothing and mannerisms.

Posted: Dec 10, 2007 at 10:34 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Queerty Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives