As a Congressional candidate in a competitive district, Carl DeMaio has been heralded as the great gay hope of the GOP, proof positive that Republicans aren’t the party of homophobia (except, of course, they are). But along the way, DeMaio, a San Diego city councilman, ran into a problem: himself.
And it just got a whole lot worse. Just two days before the election, a second male staffer stepped forward to say that DeMaio played with himself when the staffer was in a restroom. Justin Harper, a 25-year-old Navy veteran, quit as DeMaio’s regional political director two days after the July episode allegedly occured.
“I was at the urinal, and (DeMaio) came from the stall that was closest to the urinal and was kind of just standing there hovering,” Harper told KPBS. “I turned around and realized that it was Carl. He had his pants up, but his fly was undone, and he had his hand grasping his genitals.” Harper said that he just left the bathroom in silence.
This is the second bombshell to hit DeMaio’s campaign in less than a month. Todd Bosnich, a former staffer, claims that DeMaio sexually harassed him several times, culminating in DeMaio openly masturbating in front of Bosnich. DeMaio has vehemently denied the charges, claiming that Bosnich is seeking revenge for being fired for plagiarism, an allegation that DeMaio’s former deputy campaign manager says is false.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Bosnich claimed that he was promised $50,000 by DeMaio’s campaign manager, Tommy Knepper, if he would keep his mouth shut. Since refusing, Bosnich says he’s received a series of threatening calls and emails.
The accusation from Harper is not the only time that DeMaio has been said to use a restroom for more than the usual relief. Ben Hueso, who serves with De Maio on the San Diego City Council, says he twice caught DeMaio playing with himself in a restroom stall last year.
Another former city council member, Donna Frye, went so far as to hold a press conference just three days before Harper’s revelation to say she believed that DeMaio’s alleged behavior may be more widespread than people realize.
“What I believe is that there are other victims,” Frye said. “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” The criticism was particularly harsh coming from Frye, who had partnered with DeMaio on a number of initiatives and was instrumental in uncovering the sexual harassment allegations against former San Diego Mayor Bob Filner.
Bosnich’s accusation has been the bane of the campaign since they become public. In addition to the sexual harassment and bribery allegations, DeMaio has been subjected to a series of damaging leaked emails and has been pursuing an investigation into a break-in at his campaign office.
DeMaio has lashed out at the media and his opponent, incumbent Democrat Scott Peters. DeMaio branded the KPBS story “reckless” and “an outrageous lie,” claiming that there the urinal in question was out of order at the time Harper says the incident occurred.
DeMaio has also tried to play the gay victim card as part of his defense. “I guess you can say anything about the gay guy and some people will believe it,” he told The Hill.
Well, yes, particularly if there’s reason to believe it.
Meantime, a series of damaging emails keep dribbling out that show DeMaio in an unflattering light. For example, there was the email from DeMaio that mocked a Peters campaign staffer with a picture of a morbidly obese woman eating a chicken nugget. (It’s worth noting that the staffer, Kate Lyons, is a longtime straight ally of the LGBT community in San Diego, while DeMaio was booed when he attended the city’s Pride Parade in 2012.)
Then there’s the break-in in which a campaign playbook was stolen, a break-in to which DeMaio believes that Peters’ campaign is somehow connected. The Peters’ campaign says it got nothing from the break-in and immediately contacted police when it learned of information about it. (The San Diego district attorney’s office investigated both the break-in and Bosnich’s sexual harassment claims, but concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue either.)
Out of anger, DeMaio has abandoned the usual standards of political good sportsmanship, twice refusing to shake Peters hand after a debate.
Until Sunday, the race was neck-and-neck going into Tuesday’s election. Harper’s story won’t help DeMaio’s chances. Even if DeMaio wins, he may have a short tenure, since Democrats will turn out in far larger numbers for the presidential election in 2016. No matter what the outcome, though, the drama will continue. Bosnich is threatening to sue DeMaio.
And if the way he runs his campaign is any indication of how he will act in Congress, DeMaio will guarantee a steady stream of bad behavior to amuse and entertain his constituents.
NoCagada
Evidently, being a republican, he was just practicing the game plan employed by Larry “I am not gay” Craig…
BJ McFrisky
More proof that Queerty isn’t out to promote gay issues, only liberal ones. If DeMaio was a Democrat, this article would be about all the homophobes who are trying to falsely smear his reputation.
Also see:
NOW – only defends liberal women
NAACP – only defends liberals blacks
GLAAD – only defends liberal gays
Apparently, one only has civil rights if one is a Democrat.
hyhybt
What *is* it about Republican politicians that public restrooms make them horny?
Virge
TBH — this stinks of typical progressive bullshit and Alinsky tactics than it does a reckless perv.
littletwin52000
@BJ McFrisky: yet you are frequently on this site. Articles like these show the gop’s blatant hypocrisy you know the kind we want gays, women, or minorities to have rights so in steps groups like this.
Alfredo
Republicans are born hypocrites, straight or gay. A gay Republican is a contradiction in terms. Republican, as a term, trumps being gay. Good grief. It’s like black Republicans!
littletwin52000
@littletwin52000: there was supposed to be a don’t in there haha
SteveDenver
TAKE THE MONEY AND LEAK THE STORY.
Legal avenues rarely work with politicians, but the rumor mill is bone-crushing.
Being gay and Republican entails deafening cognitive dissonance: I would never trust anyone who attempts that.
LAguy323
He’s an amateur, Larry Craig wannabe.
manjoguy
This “scandal” reminds me of the infamous William Jefferson Clinton’s sexual escapades with his many women (I seem to recall that Clinton is, dare I say it, a “Democrat”?). But in addition to perhaps what some Democrats might say is innocuous sexual play, WJC lied and deceived. Paula Jones, Whitewater, NAFTA are negatives. But Clinton did some good things as far as policy goes, too, just a Reagan did and, who knows, maybe DeMaio would do. But, as SteveDenver points out, being gay and Republican is one big target on your back. Hyhybt needs to research these DEMOCRATS and their unbridled libidos: Anthony Weiner, Eliot Spitzer, David Wu, Kwame Kilpatrick, John Edwards, David Paterson, Antonio Villaraigosa, Barney Frank, Gary Hart, Gerry Studds, Fred Richmond, Marc Dann, Paul Morrison, Gary Condit,Tim Mahoney, Roosevelt Dobbins, Neil Goldschmidt, Jim McGreevey, Bob Wise, Paul Patton,Eric Massa, Mel Reynolds, Brock Adams, Robert Decheine, Wade Sanders,Chuck Robb, Bob Filner(mayor of San Diego, sexual harassment of women)and on and on. Oh, and Al Gore was no saint, btw. So, stop with this ridiculous, mindless Republican-bashing. Republicans can be lacking in integrity as well as Dems. But we voters must be vigilant and informed and certainly NOT elect a politician just because of the R or D after their name OR on a single-issue such as gay marriage. We need solutions to a lot of other problem facing our beloved country as well.
hyhybt
@manjoguy: Since you specifically mentioned me: you obviously can’t read. I neither said nor implied that Democrats don’t have sex scandals, for lack of a better phrase. It just seems like getting turned on *in public restrooms* is a Republican thing.
Matt
It’s got nothing to do with your party.
Barney Frank is a Democrat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank#Scandal
NoCagada
@manjoguy: The difference between the republicans pervs and the democratic pervs is that the republicans are hypocritically crying about family-values and trying to take rights away. Evidently , HYPOCRISY is what turns you on.
BJ McFrisky
@Alfredo: It’s so funny how you liberals think you have a monopoly on all minorities: gays, women, blacks, Hispanics, etc. When you see a black Republican, your response is, “Uncle Tom!” A gay Republican is a “self-loather” in the eyes of liberals. And Republican women? They’re just stupid, right?
Good grief, you libs are so predictably naïve.
BJ McFrisky
@littletwin52000: Your statement made no sense whatsoever. Try again?
Saint Law
@BJ McFrisky: It isn’t liberals who are campaigning to restrict black people’s right to vote, or women’s reproductive rights or gay people’s every right.
If you don’t know this then you are either ignorant or stupid. If you do and you still support the repugs then you’re either insane or evil.
So, ignorant, stupid, insane or evil, which is it? Coz there aint any other options.
littletwin52000
Allow me to simplify it for you when one group of people so clearly does things to oppose the rights and opportunities of others of course the people they oppose will call them out on it on any avenue they can. Make enough sense for you now BJ? So the next time you want to spew conservative BS remember for every one ” moderate” conservative there at 20 mainstream conservatives
Alan down in Florida
A gay Republican isn’t an oxymoron – it’s just a plain old moron.
jmmartin
I used to claim that “gay Republican” was oxymoronic. Then I met a couple of gay Republicans. They were pretty much carbon copies of your typical bourgeois Guppies, with twin white Mercedes Benzes in the drive and a house big enough to accommodate the Romney clan. Their primary reason for existing appeared to be the amassing of wealth in emulation of the Koch Brothers. No matter that every time there is congressional polling of marriage equality positions almost all, if not all, Republicans are against such legislation, often on religious grounds. Ultimately, though, nothing is proved so much as that all or a good part of the GOP is white and entrepreneurial whether gay or straight.
littletwin52000
@BJ McFrisky: And another thing I’m curious as to what goes through your mind when you hear your fellow conservatives say stupid $hit like marriage is between man and woman. Do you not think they are talking about you? because as a black male when i see them do ignorant $hit like repealnost laws that allow me to do simple things like afford health care amongst other things then turn around and hear other black males not only side with them but to go along and say liberal laws are like slavery of course they will be called uncle toms.
danwroy
Guys: he’s a *former* city councilman. And Ben Hueso is also no longer on the council; today he’s a scumbag Assemblyman who just got busted for DUI, and the former City Council president Tony Young denies Hueso’s story.
scotshot
@Saint Law: Troll?
BJ McFrisky
@Saint Law: Show me one example of anyone—anywhere, ever—who campaigned to restrict black people’s votes. You cannot, because it’s just another liberal myth to vilify the other side. Restricting women’s reproductive rights? Every woman in America can reproduce or choose not to at her will—Republicans have nothing to do with it. And we gays and other minorities might get support across the board if we weren’t so goddam whiney about everything, accusing straight white males for all of our woes. I’m guessing that straight white males are getting pretty sick of being blamed for all the evils in the world by people like you.
ps – Every instance of voter fraud on record was committed in favor of the Democratic party. Look it up.
Kangol
@BJ McFrisky:
Are you kidding? Look up North Carolina Senator Furnifold McLendel Simmons, who overtly campaigned on restricting the black vote in his state to ensure white power. White supremacists used a variety of means, from poll taxes, to paramilitary violence, to economic threats, to restrictive laws, to educational and character requirements, to shenanigans involving moving polling places at the last minute, and on and on, to restrict black voting. You either have no clue about American hisotry, or your’re being willfully ignorant, but a cursory review of even a standard US history book, especially one dealing with the former Confederate states, will disabuse you of your innocence and lack of knowledge about this long and sordid history, which continues today.
Want more names? James K. Vardaman. Theodore Bilbo. Hoke Smith. Coleman Blease. Cotton Ed Smith. Strom Thurmond. Virginia Senator Carter Glass (after whom the now repealed Glass-Steagall act was named, who said of the 1902 Virginia Constitution, “Discrimination! Why that is exactly what we propose. To remove every negro voter who can be gotten rid of, legally, without materially impairing the numerical strength of the white electorate.” And on and on. Conservatives have a long history of this kind of stuff. But you knew that, right?