Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  If Only

Carrie Prejean’s Definition of Marriage Breaches the Space-Time Continuum

The only way to explain Miss California Carrie Prejean’s assertion that Americans have the freedom to choose between “opposite” marriage and same-sex marriage? SHE IS FROM THE FUTURE! In the future, every state legalizes same-sex marriage, and Prejean has been teleported back to 2009 to deliver that message. Or at least that’s the brilliant theory from Jay “Ill Doctrine” Smooth.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Apr 26, 2009
Tagged: , , , ,
15 Comments

No. 1 · Geoff

I like this guy.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 11:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Darryl

Now this guy is funny and smart, which makes him kind of cute in my book. I’d like to hear his response after viewing some of Davey Wavey’s “profound” videos.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 12:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Dennis

I think he’s kind of cute too, in a nebbish/nerdy kinda way…I wonder what his “flux-capacitor” looks like?

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 12:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · RichardR · Member · 206 comments

He’s sharp. Smart and funny is the best.

But I’ve been wondering if Ms. Prejean, when she babbled about how great it is that Americans have a choice, wasn’t talking so much about marriage but about being gay. That we choose, and therefore are entitled to nothing, including equality before the law, is a guiding precept of the religious right.

In subsequent interviews she has asserted that being biblically correct trumps being politically correct. I think she’s even more anti-gay than we think she is.

And of course she’s far more irrelevant than anyone thinks she is.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 12:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · rogue dandelion · Member · 353 comments

refreshing!
he handled this with humor and grace- instead calling her a stupid bitch(directly-which is what i would have done)
and seriously-2009 beauty pagents?

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 12:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · sal

lmao!!

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 4:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Bill S

Funny, cute (in nerdy way) and mad vocab skillz!

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 5:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · vernonvanderbilt · Member · 675 comments

Delightful. I think I actually like this guy. More of him, less of Davey, please.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 6:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · Michael W.

This guy is boring. He needs to hit the gym and start taking his shirt off for videos like Davey Wavey. Then I might care about what he has to say.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 7:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · jake

funny – brought a smile to my face

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 7:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Paul

@Michael W.: I think you’ve been out voted, Michael W. Unless it’s a “Morning Goods” post I think most of us are looking for a little more substance than what is offered by air-head Davey. If that’s all you’re interested in go to one of the gazillion sites offering mindless skin.

Posted: Apr 26, 2009 at 11:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · vernonvanderbilt · Member · 675 comments

@HeteroDefenseLeague: “I mean, they didn’t just wake up one day and decide to be attracted to horses and dogs, so it must be genetic!”

So are you actually in a relationship then? Good for you. It’s hard to find love in this cold, callous world. Grip your love by the mane and don’t let go for anything. Dare to dream!

Posted: Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Robert, NYC

If Prejean wants to be biblically correct, she should not be entering beauty pageants, an act of vanity condemned in her bible, plus flaunting her flesh in front of married and single men in a revealing swimsuit is yet another act forbidden by the book of fables. Her hypocrisy and double-stardard are breath-taking, but then so are most of the religious zealots. They are beyond transparent.

Posted: Apr 27, 2009 at 11:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Robert, NYC

@HeteroDefenseLeague:

Hey there closet case! So you woke up and one day decided you were straight unlike religion which is a choice, learned behavior and a lifestyle. Nobody comes into this world religious either. If you can prove that a straight person can be converted to a gay orientation then maybe you would have a modicum of credibility. You’re an idiot. Come out of that dark closet you’ve been living in. You seem to be protesting far too much on a gay blogsite, now I wonder why that is? Can’t stay away from the guys huh?

Posted: Apr 27, 2009 at 11:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · J. Clarence

I love Ill Doctrine. Perfect assessment of the whole situation. Also, I’m all with him, there no reason for a female pageant in 2009. And yes he’s totally adorable.

Posted: Apr 27, 2009 at 5:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY