It’s not just the Archdiocese of Washington fuming over recognizing homosexuals as human beings. The United Kingdom’s Roman Catholic Church, which has 11 adoption agencies, is still in the fight against having to consider gay couples as fit parents for kids.
Only one of those agencies is still fighting the 2007 law that prohibited discrimination against gays in such matters.
Three Catholic bishops told worshippers that they were taking the case of the Catholic Care adoption agency to the High Court on Wednesday because they were fighting for the rights of vulnerable children to a loving family. They said that the closure of the adoption agency, which finds new homes for about 20 ‘difficult-to-place’ children each year, would represent the loss of an ‘effective and well-respected resource’.
The agency, which serves the dioceses of Leeds, Middlesbrough and Hallam in South Yorkshire, is the only one of 11 Catholic adoption agencies in the country to continue to fight the Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs). The law outlawed discrimination against gay couples in the provision of goods and services and was pushed through Parliament in 2007 in spite of protests from leaders of all the mainstream religious faiths.
It meant that Catholics adoption agencies – which together found new homes for about 250 children in care each year – were obliged to assess same-sex couples as potential adopters or foster parents.
Naturally, you’ve got the Church calling gay adoption “gravely immoral” and all those wonderful superlatives. And you’ve got British lawmakers reminding everyone that, hey, government is a secular institution, people.
The appeal to the High Court will be heard on the same day that the Catholic bishops of England and Wales publishes a pre-General Election document in which they say it is ‘essential’ for politicians to support marriage and the family.
While the main political parties disagree on the importance of heterosexual marriage, with Labour arguing that it was simply a lifestyle choice, they share support for civil partnerships and gay adoption.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Mike in Asheville, nee "in Brooklyn"
Adoption of children is a matter of public policy. Should the Catholic Church or any other organization, be unable to provide adoption services for all citizens then they should be replaced with providers of services which will not discriminate. As a matter of public policy, the public’s interest must require that those who supply public services do so without violating public policy. Since the Catholic Church is specifically violating the public policy to provide adoption services to individuals and couples irrespective of the potential parents sexual orientation, then it is the Catholic Church that should be banned from providing the services.
Pete
National Public Radio reported several months ago that Gays and Lesbians adopt at a much higher rate than do heterosexual couples.
The Catholic Church made a big fanfare about getting out of adoptions in Washington Dc because of gay marriage starting here later this week. Catholic Charities only placed 4 children last year, a number that can easily be handled by the several other agencies.
Cam
Hmm, and interesting that all of these children available for adoption are coming from hetrosexual unions that were unable or unwilling to care for them. Interesting that the church is silent on that front. Then again, with the enormous scandal in Ireland of the Catholic orphanages where children were tortoured, abused, raped, and forced to work for nothing perhaps the church should just stay silent on these issues.