Christian Homo-Hater Takes On Faggot Families

kaeserH.jpg
Last August, Colorado’s Mesa County Library exhibited works from the traveling Love Makes A Family show. Sponsored in part by Western Equality and other gay rights activists, the installation pictures gay couples and their children in an effort to broaden people’s horizons on the definition of the definitive family. Offended by the display, an organization called Christians for Healthy Families had posted a reactionary protest show. While on the surface this just seems to be a case of ideological disagreement, there are – as always – bigger questions lurking down below.

First let’s take a brief second to examine last year’s show: Love Makes A Family. Featuring the photography of Gigi Kaeser and interviews by Peggy Gillespie, the traveling exhibition describes its mission thus:

Through first-person accounts and positive images, this exhibit seeks to challenge and change damaging myths and stereotypes about LGBT people and their families. At the most basic level, Love Makes A Family combats homophobia by breaking silence and making the invisible visible. By encouraging people of all ages – beginning in early childhood – to affirm and appreciate diversity, this traveling rental exhibit contributes to the process of dismantling the destructive power of prejudice and intolerance, thereby making the world a safer place for all families.

Alright. Sounds pretty straight-forward – families need safety, the show wants to promote said safety. Pretty cut and dry, right? Not according to the people who put up the current show.

Opening with the daunting question, “Do you want God’s protection?”, the new display has been broken into two main components. The first section features gendered bowls of paint: pink and blue representing women and men, respectively. As we all know from pre-school, when mixed together, the colors take on a purple hue, which, despite lavender’s association with faggotry, represents marriage. The other section has bowls of similarly colored paint, representing same-sex lovers. Mix ’em together and what do you get? The same color, of course: the group’s not-so-clever dig at the so-called unproductive gay union.

Of the protest, organizer Carol Anderson tells The Mesa County Sentinel:

I got the idea after the homosexual display… They ha a pro-homosexual display at the library, which I didn’t feel was appropriate because I’m Christian. Thank goodness free speech goes both ways.

Is she trying to be ironic with that last statement? If so, our hats are off to you, Ms. Anderson.

Speaking of free speech, we’re sure you’re wondering what the gay rights gurus have to say about all of this. Well, Love Makes a Family sponsor, Jeff Barringer‘s not down. He tells The Sentinel:

The content is offensive to me while recognizing that they deeply believe in what they’re putting out there. It’s alienating and offensive to single parents, to divorced individuals, obviously to gays and lesbians. To me, it is fueling ideological conflict rather than creating a conversation.

That’s certainly true, but couldn’t the same argument be made about the Love Makes a Family display?

Sure, we’re playing devil’s advocate on this one, but if you one’s truly looking for a conversation, one would have exhibited pictures of all kinds of families. For example, Kaeser and Gillespie (plus some more interviews from Rebecca Boyd) have organized a similar show entitled In Our Family. Also a traveling exhibit, the show describes itself:

In Our Family is a museum-quality traveling photo-text exhibit about twenty families representing a breadth of diversity and family configurations… The positive and realistic photographs, along with the candid interviews with family members of all ages, affirm an inclusive and expansive vision of family life today.

It seems to us that this show’s more conversation worthy than Love Makes Family, the show that’s exclusively about homo couples.

Sure, it’s nice to see images of happy gay families and all that, but if Barringer were truly concerned about conversation, rather than controversy, he would have sponsored the more inclusive show and spared Anderson and her Bible thumping pals the effort. And, perhaps, made more of a difference than a discontent.

But that’s just our opinion. What say you, our loyal, clever and opinionated readers?

Don't forget to share:

Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...

We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated