Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  COndom sense

Condoms May Finally Go Right Where They Belong… Behind Bars

This August, California Democratic Congressional Representative Barbara Lee introduced the Repeal HIV Discrimination Act, a bill that would end HIV criminalization nationwide. But during that month she also introduced the Justice Act, a bill that could get U.S. prisons to start handing out condoms and automatically re-enroll HIV-positive ex-cons in Medicaid once they get out.

Let’s take a closer look at one of the possibly lowest-costing measures to help drastically reduce the spread of HIV in prisons.

HIV-advocacy group Housing Works explains the immediate beneficiaries of this reform:

“25 percent of the HIV-positive population passes through U.S. correctional facilities each year, just one percent of prisons and jails can legally distribute condoms. For years, activists have said that withholding tools to prevent the spread of STDs violates the human rights of incarcerated people—a burden felt especially by blacks and Latinos, who make up the vast majority of imprisoned individuals.”

So Lee’s bill would not only help reduce the spread of HIV in prisons, it would also reduce the costs of caring for HIV-positive ex-cons once they’re back on the outside—if inmates don’t catch HIV then Medicaid won’t have to float the costs of lifetime treatment. That’s good news for fiscal conservatives and prison reformers as well.

But sadly, Lee’s bill cannot force prisons to actually hand out any condoms since prisons fall under state (and not federal) jurisdiction; her bill can only suggest that they do. Right now only two U.S. states hand out condoms—Vermont and Mississippi—and only New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia do it as well.

Currently, 81 percent of European prisons hand out condoms. The number of U.S. prisons doing the same: one percent. Lee’s bill would do much better if it provided an incentive for prisons to comply.

The American Public Health Association, the United Nations Joint Program on HIV/AIDS and the World Health Organization all endorse prison condom distribution programs as an effective means to prevent transmission. So why have state prison boards been so slow to adopt the practice?

Is it to further stigmatize the disease? To serve as a greater deterrent for would-be criminals? Because they don’t really care about the well-being of their inmates? Or because there’s just too much local money in making ex-inmates dependent on HIV-medication?

Images via abardwell and victoriapeckham

By:           Daniel Villarreal
On:           Sep 8, 2011
Tagged: , , ,

  • 5 Comments
    • paul f
      paul f

      No, the reason they don’t hand out condoms in prison is because it implies that there’s SEX going on in there. Not just any sex, but the worstest vile un-natural and disgusting sex possible, you know, man on man sex. Their assumption being that if you don’t hand out the condoms, the sex somehow won’t happen.

      Sep 8, 2011 at 5:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Reed Braden
      Reed Braden

      Condoms belong wherever there are penises.

      Sep 8, 2011 at 6:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jack
      Jack

      Condoms also force the states to have to address prison rape.

      Sep 8, 2011 at 9:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DavyJones
      DavyJones

      All the would-be motives posed in the last paragraph I think assume a little too much malice on the part of state prison boards. I think they’ve been slow to adopt the policy because they are working on limited budgets from the start, and if someone wishing to reduce that budget was able to make an attack ad that said they were using tax-payer dollars to ‘fund safe-sex in prison’; that budget might get a bit smaller.

      We don’t have condoms in prisons for the same reason we often see Abstinence-only sex-ed classes in schools. It’s just too easy for ‘the other side’ to attack anyone who is spending tax dollars on safe-sex…

      Sep 9, 2011 at 11:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Respondent
      Respondent

      @DavyJones:

      I don’t think even the American public is stupid enough to buy that argument.

      People who argue that ‘funding safe-sex in prison’ is a waste of money should be incarcerated as they pose an obvious and immediate danger to themselves and others. :-)

      Also, abstinence-only sex-ed classes are NOT the (US) norm. If the reasoning was the same, condom availability in jails would be the norm.

      A 2002 study conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 58% of secondary school principals describe their sex education curriculum as “abstinence plus”. (See citation at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Sex_education#United_States)

      Sep 9, 2011 at 2:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.