Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

Congress Overpowers Bush!

sadbush2.jpg
It’s a historic day for Congress, America and everything else! For the first time in President Bush’s nearly seven year reign of terror, Democrats and Republicans mustered the gumption to overturn one of this vetoes:

The Senate voted overwhelmingly today for a popular $23 billion water projects measure affecting locales across the country, thereby handing President Bush his first defeat in a veto showdown with Congress.

The vote was 79 to 14, far more than the two-thirds needed to override the veto that President Bush cast last Friday. Only 12 Republicans voted against the measure, and just two Democrats, Senators Russell D. Feingold of Wisconsin and Claire McCaskill of Missouri.

On Tuesday, the House voted by 361 to 54 in favor of the bill, also well over the two-thirds barrier to nullify the veto.

This shit’s way more exciting than China Town!

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Nov 8, 2007
Tagged: , , , ,
7 Comments

No. 1 · Woof · Member · 114 comments

Ding dong the witch is dead.

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 4:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Becca · Member · 58 comments

About time Congress finally did something to fight this Moronic, Constitution Hating Tyrant that stole The Presidency!!!!

Next, can we get Impeachment “back ON the table”

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 4:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Lamb Cannon

except…. if feingold voted against it… hmmmm

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 5:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Brian

Sorry guys, but this one’s nothing to celebrate. Bush was actually right for once to veto the bill, as it’s loaded up with pork. That’s why it’s so popular, and why people like Feingold are against it. Sad.

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 5:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · leomoore · Member · 647 comments

I don’t give a rat’s ass that Congress overrode a Bush veto on something like this. I’d be more heartened if the Congress overrode Bush on something like SCHIP. This was just a case of pork spread around to buy enough votes.

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 5:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Woof · Member · 114 comments

I don’t care what was veto’d just glad someone told that hillbilly No for once.

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 5:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Rt. Rev. Dr. RES · Member · 444 comments

Pork is defined as when the American people themselves get part of the treasury returned to them in their states for infrastructure or other goals that benefit the national commonweal.

Pork is not defined as the black hole of monies that have been unaccounted for in Iraq and Afghanistan and tax breaks for oil companies and other wealthy folks. That is merely spending.

Posted: Nov 8, 2007 at 6:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.