Wonders never cease!
Instead of railing against the NY Times for their lengthy piece on young gay marriage, anti-gay activist Albert Mohler, who previously pondered homo genetic cleansing, offers a fairly measured, moderate reflection:
"Young Gay Rites" is itself a noteworthy signal about the future of marriage. If [author Benoit] Denizet-Lewis is right, the legalization of same-sex marriage is changing the ways some homosexuals are living their lives. In other words, same-sex marriage in Massachusetts is changing homosexual culture in some unexpected ways.
Before you get too excited, however, Mohler ends his piece by wondering if gay marriage will spur straights to start thinking outside the monogamous box:
If the legalization of same-sex marriage is changing homosexual culture, is it also changing heterosexual marriage? We can only wonder how long it will take for some heterosexual couples to decide that "emotional fidelity" and "sexual fidelity" can be separated.
Hey, he had to find something to bitch about, right?
Jay Leffew Is Sorry For Attacking Davey Wavey, But Not YouTube’s Apathetic Gays (30)
· Quake says: As far as being a Gay Christian, Its like saying I’m a black KKK member. According... »
Maggie Gallagher’s Maine Condolence Letter Will Surely Cause You to Tear Up (58)
· Quake says: We lost by a small scale, the young generation is getting it. The old people can die... »
The DNC Totally SCREWED US OVER in Maine. And Then Lied About It (38)
· Charles Merrill says: Bill Perdue There is always going to be the uber rich, it’s the nature... »
Were These Dads Harassed + Detained By Wal-Mart Because They’re Gay? (28)
· Quake says: I bet you while all the Walmart workers surrounded this couple about 5 other people... »
Can’t A Television Show Say ‘Fag’ Anymore Without GLAAD Getting Upset? (85)
· Robert, NYC says: Chris, Andy…exactly what I was trying to bring out in my previous posts.... »
MJ Back In The Saddle (12)
· alajdia says: I haven’t seen you for weeks. buy cheap nolvadex http://www.stumbleupon... »
Is It Wrong to Refuse to Have Sex With HIV-Positive Men? (100)
· Sydney says: I agree with #38. Much rather be an asshole about it than willingly get sick. »
We Love It When Neil Patrick Harris Gets ROUGH (4)
· arnau says: I first heard “messages of dates” just when NPH’s pic appears on his... »
The Big Problem If ENDA Doesn’t Stipulate What Changes Must Be Made to Employee Bathrooms (7)
· jason says: There is no such thing as a “trans gender”. Your gender is either male or... »
· Dr. Jillian T. Weiss says: Reply to WHAT’s comment: You say that I don’t “answer... »
Ugh. *vomits on shoe*
That stupid P.O.S. article suggested exactly what I thought it would – and here we have this insurgent saying it.
i was encouraged for a second, but i still think its a positive step. one step fwd one step back.
http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com
"We can only wonder how long it will take for some heterosexual couples to decide that 'emotional fidelity' and 'sexual fidelity' can be separated."
Not very long, if you're a conservative. Just ask Gingrich, Thomson, Craig…
Right, Paul Raposo! It's not like sexual fidelity has been a hallmark of heterosexual unions. That's all the mythmaking of the right.
This man's initial comments make it clear that the Right's ideas about gay life and culture are flawed from the start.
Gay marriage hasn't spurred my gay friends and I to be more faithful, more loving or less sleazy, thank you very much. The fact is, we were all faithful, loving and unsleazy to begin with. (Well, at least as much as our straight peers were.)
The image of pale-faced gays creeping through public baths with green carnations attached to their lapels must be alive and well somewhere.
Asshats.
I think my genetic donors were about 40 years ahead of him.