
When marriage equality rains, marriage equality pours. On the heels of the Iowa Supreme Court affirming marriage equality and Vermont's legislature overcoming the governor's veto to legalizing same-sex marriage, our nation's capital makes some in-roads: Washington D.C. will recognize same-sex marriages from any state where it's legal.
The city already grants civil unions to same-sex couples. Now, if you're a gay couple married in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Iowa, or Vermont, you'll be entitled to the same rights as straight married couples in D.C. The D.C. Council today passed a bill granting those rights, reports WaPo.
The initial vote was 12-0. The unanimous vote sets the stage for future debate on legalizing same-sex marriage in the District and a clash with Congress, which approves the city's laws under Home Rule. The council is expected to take a final vote on the legislation next month.
Council member Jim Graham (D-Ward 1), who is gay, called the amendment a matter of "basic fairness."
The city's laws on same-sex unions have been murky, he explained. Couples ask, he said, "Is my marriage valid in D.C.? For years now, it has not been clear."
"It's high time we send a clear, unequivocal message to those persons of the same sex and married in another jurisdiction that their marriage is valid in D.C.," said Graham, who added, "I hope this city recognizes this is a human rights struggle."
Council member David A. Catania (I-At Large), who is also gay, predicted it was only a matter of time before the council also takes up a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the District. "It's no secret that I have been working on legislation that would take us further," he said. "This is the march toward human rights and equality. This is not the march toward special rights. This is the equal march and that march is coming here."
Will Rhode Island Make Gay Marriage Supporter Lincoln Chaffee Its Next Governor?s (6)
· Lukas P. says: Oops—I did know there was ONE F in Chafee but without cofee I got conffused. At... »
Queerty’s New Year’s Resolutions For: 20- and 30-Somethings (14)
· Alexandre says: you sound like a steal Andy! I’m in! »
· Andy says: 1. I need someone to make this happen. Any takers? 2. My Fbook is essentially on... »
The Entire Bi-Sexual History of Real World: D.C.’s Mike Manning (109)
· glasshouses says: Sing it, my brothers and sisters in bi-dom. »
‘Almost the only way that marriage can continue to mean something in any sort of real way is if it gets more inclusive’ (4)
· Lukas P. says: I get the book “Eat, Pray, Love” confused with “Eats, Shoots, Craps... »
Since Britney Spears Couldn’t Do Justice to “Gimme More,” Kevin Aviance Gives It The Old College Try (15)
· Anthony says: wack* »
· Anthony says: If you’re going to cover Britney do it justice. This shiz was wachkkkk. »
Rhode Island’s Lawmakers Deliver a Slew of Awesome Vetoes of Gov. Carcieri’s Bullshit (Including That Funeral Bill) (7)
· Taylor Siluwé says: Sweet! »
· Lukas P. says: The most “interested” [sic] thing about this post was guessing which... »
Annise Parker Avoids Instituting Radical Homosexual Agenda on First Day In Office (12)
· reason says: No. 10 · Lukas P: My comments were directed at the first few post not at you. On the... »
That's not possible. It's a well known fact that black folk hate gay folk. Check the gay handbook.
@The Gay Numbers:
yeah, but puh-lenty of black gay folks in DC, though…
sounds like they are testing the congressional waters
Chitown:
Not possible. Gay and black are mutually exclusive. No gays are blacks. No blacks are gays. Check the gay and black handbooks.
Best regards,
Gay Numbers
@The Gay Numbers:
LOL!