<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Our Gay Leaders Have to Go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-107491</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-107491</guid>
		<description>Thanks to the HRC itself, in part, we have always been devided since their decision to not stick up for Trans rights. 

White, Hetero-normative gay and lesbian couples seem to be the only people&#039;s rights that HRC are concerned with. This is not the LGBT community, this is only one of many. 

Very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the HRC itself, in part, we have always been devided since their decision to not stick up for Trans rights. </p>
<p>White, Hetero-normative gay and lesbian couples seem to be the only people&#8217;s rights that HRC are concerned with. This is not the LGBT community, this is only one of many. </p>
<p>Very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100452</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100452</guid>
		<description>Americans for &#039;truth&#039;...(cough) was a good read, Christians are getting good at cottoning on and throwing being &#039;squalid queers&#039; back in your faces, time the so called (self appointed) GLBT leadership rethought their public strategies, the skanky American way is not the best way Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, Countries of the EEC &amp; others have benefited by strategizing in ways that promote Gay rights in their national law, the USA is now a dieing superpower an economic weakling her people insipid, arrogant, unaware and behaving like degenerate inbreeds, the American dream a past illusion you have now joined much of the rest of the world suffering the deprivation of good leadership, learn by others successes not relying on your own presupposed political correctness or you are doomed to further failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans for &#8216;truth&#8217;&#8230;(cough) was a good read, Christians are getting good at cottoning on and throwing being &#8216;squalid queers&#8217; back in your faces, time the so called (self appointed) GLBT leadership rethought their public strategies, the skanky American way is not the best way Canada, New Zealand, Brazil, Countries of the EEC &amp; others have benefited by strategizing in ways that promote Gay rights in their national law, the USA is now a dieing superpower an economic weakling her people insipid, arrogant, unaware and behaving like degenerate inbreeds, the American dream a past illusion you have now joined much of the rest of the world suffering the deprivation of good leadership, learn by others successes not relying on your own presupposed political correctness or you are doomed to further failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaroslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaroslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100360</guid>
		<description>Also I should also point out that the YES on 8 people (for those who missed it) put out the TV ad with the children at the same sex wedding -

a) without permission of the parents involved (would you want your child&#039;s photo on Statewide TV without your knowledge or permission?)

b) they LIED about it implying the children were forced to attend as a school function

So much for the value of children and the family they claim they are &quot;protecting.&quot;  And &quot;truth&quot; - don&#039;t most religions teach telling the truth is a virtue?

BTW, I echo John in SF as well, I have not vandalized any Churches etc. and don&#039;t support that.  We&#039;ll never know the whole story of course, but there are instances of violence being self inflicted and blamed on the other side for media attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I should also point out that the YES on 8 people (for those who missed it) put out the TV ad with the children at the same sex wedding -</p>
<p>a) without permission of the parents involved (would you want your child&#8217;s photo on Statewide TV without your knowledge or permission?)</p>
<p>b) they LIED about it implying the children were forced to attend as a school function</p>
<p>So much for the value of children and the family they claim they are &#8220;protecting.&#8221;  And &#8220;truth&#8221; &#8211; don&#8217;t most religions teach telling the truth is a virtue?</p>
<p>BTW, I echo John in SF as well, I have not vandalized any Churches etc. and don&#8217;t support that.  We&#8217;ll never know the whole story of course, but there are instances of violence being self inflicted and blamed on the other side for media attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaroslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaroslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100359</guid>
		<description>And I should also point out that the YES on 8 people (for those who missed it) put out the TV ad with the children at the same sex wedding -

a) without permission of the parents involved (would you want your child&#039;s photo on Statewide TV without your knowledge or permission?)

b) they LIED about it implying the children were forced to attend as a school function

So much for the value of children and the family they claim they are &quot;protecting.&quot;  And &quot;truth&quot; - don&#039;t most religions teach telling the truth is a virtue?

BTW, I echo John in SF as well, I have not vandalized any Churches etc. and don&#039;t support that.  We&#039;ll never know the whole story of course, but there are instances of violence being self inflicted and blamed on the other side for media attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I should also point out that the YES on 8 people (for those who missed it) put out the TV ad with the children at the same sex wedding -</p>
<p>a) without permission of the parents involved (would you want your child&#8217;s photo on Statewide TV without your knowledge or permission?)</p>
<p>b) they LIED about it implying the children were forced to attend as a school function</p>
<p>So much for the value of children and the family they claim they are &#8220;protecting.&#8221;  And &#8220;truth&#8221; &#8211; don&#8217;t most religions teach telling the truth is a virtue?</p>
<p>BTW, I echo John in SF as well, I have not vandalized any Churches etc. and don&#8217;t support that.  We&#8217;ll never know the whole story of course, but there are instances of violence being self inflicted and blamed on the other side for media attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100245</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100245</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100190&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JJ&lt;/a&gt;: @&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100228&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jaroslaw&lt;/a&gt;: 

I Ditto Jaroslaw - and I&#039;d also point out that most of what you are talking about has nothing to do with prop 8 or even marriage.

- the language of prop 8 said nothing about curriculum or schools.  Zero Zilch Nada.  Curriculum is generally set at the school board level anyway.  

-Whether children are taught not to disrespect LGBT people has nothing to do with whether California recognises LGBT marriage.  Nothing.  Children should be taught not to use slurs against anyone - whether they are married or single.  I&#039;m kind of disturbed that you think it is ok for children to be permitted to use slurs in school.  

-Marriage is not a requirement for adoption, so the whole adoption question has nothing at all to do with Prop 8 or gay marriage. Whether Prop 8 passed or failed, gay people would have the right to adopt in California. 

I don&#039;t personally condone name calling of pro-8 voters, or any kind of sign stealing, cross stomping, or any of that.  But I&#039;ve had my no on 8 sign vandalised 3 times, and a neighbor&#039;s dog defecated under it twice.  And I live blocks from the Castro district in the heart of San Francisco.  Imagine the intolerance we face in places like Salt Lake City, Yuba City, Modesto, Orange County, and the like, where we are not so concentrated.  Because we have all experienced truly hateful behavior throughout our lives (not just during campaign season), we have a tendancy to assume that all people who oppose our rights are hateful.  We should be more careful about our language, but don&#039;t mistake the fact that we all know people who have been called names, beaten up, or even killed just becasue they were lesbian, gay, bi, or transgendered.

Five years ago, I attended part of the trial of one of our own murdered 5 years ago.  The pictures of her blodied body, beaten and raped into an unrecognizable form, shows all to vividly that hate against us is still alive and well right here in California. THAT is why we KNOW that at least some of those who voted against us are filled with hatred for us.  And that is why our children should be tought to respect everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-100190" rel="nofollow">JJ</a>: @<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-100228" rel="nofollow">Jaroslaw</a>: </p>
<p>I Ditto Jaroslaw &#8211; and I&#8217;d also point out that most of what you are talking about has nothing to do with prop 8 or even marriage.</p>
<p>- the language of prop 8 said nothing about curriculum or schools.  Zero Zilch Nada.  Curriculum is generally set at the school board level anyway.  </p>
<p>-Whether children are taught not to disrespect LGBT people has nothing to do with whether California recognises LGBT marriage.  Nothing.  Children should be taught not to use slurs against anyone &#8211; whether they are married or single.  I&#8217;m kind of disturbed that you think it is ok for children to be permitted to use slurs in school.  </p>
<p>-Marriage is not a requirement for adoption, so the whole adoption question has nothing at all to do with Prop 8 or gay marriage. Whether Prop 8 passed or failed, gay people would have the right to adopt in California. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t personally condone name calling of pro-8 voters, or any kind of sign stealing, cross stomping, or any of that.  But I&#8217;ve had my no on 8 sign vandalised 3 times, and a neighbor&#8217;s dog defecated under it twice.  And I live blocks from the Castro district in the heart of San Francisco.  Imagine the intolerance we face in places like Salt Lake City, Yuba City, Modesto, Orange County, and the like, where we are not so concentrated.  Because we have all experienced truly hateful behavior throughout our lives (not just during campaign season), we have a tendancy to assume that all people who oppose our rights are hateful.  We should be more careful about our language, but don&#8217;t mistake the fact that we all know people who have been called names, beaten up, or even killed just becasue they were lesbian, gay, bi, or transgendered.</p>
<p>Five years ago, I attended part of the trial of one of our own murdered 5 years ago.  The pictures of her blodied body, beaten and raped into an unrecognizable form, shows all to vividly that hate against us is still alive and well right here in California. THAT is why we KNOW that at least some of those who voted against us are filled with hatred for us.  And that is why our children should be tought to respect everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaroslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaroslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100228</guid>
		<description>JJ you are so ignorant - 

1.  First graders were INVITED to their teacher&#039;s wedding, it was not a required activity

2. The pledge cards were intended for an older age group children - the school acknowledged it was some sort of mistake.  Sorry, life is like that - no perfect schools, no perfect families, no perfect employees, no perfect anything.

3. Catholic charities chose not to place children in QUALIFIED homes that passed all the required tests, so they chose to shut down their charity rather than place children in same sex households.  That&#039;s how it is when you take government money.....ALL recipients must obey the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ you are so ignorant &#8211; </p>
<p>1.  First graders were INVITED to their teacher&#8217;s wedding, it was not a required activity</p>
<p>2. The pledge cards were intended for an older age group children &#8211; the school acknowledged it was some sort of mistake.  Sorry, life is like that &#8211; no perfect schools, no perfect families, no perfect employees, no perfect anything.</p>
<p>3. Catholic charities chose not to place children in QUALIFIED homes that passed all the required tests, so they chose to shut down their charity rather than place children in same sex households.  That&#8217;s how it is when you take government money&#8230;..ALL recipients must obey the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-100190</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-100190</guid>
		<description>What lies did the prop 8 people make?  Please document why the statement was a lie.  For instance, I&#039;ve heard over and over that school curriculums would not be affected by governmental recognition of same-sex marriage, but then there were at least two high profile examples of schools who 1) had a field trip to a same-sex marriage (1st graders) and 2) had children sign a pledge to not use LGBT slurs (kindergartners-you can&#039;t have them sign something like this without explaining what LGBT stands for).  Also, it is true that the Catholic charities had to shut down their adoption agency because the State was forcing them to adopt to same-sex married couples.  It is a fact that pro-8 people were called &quot;bigots&quot;, filled with &quot;hate&quot;, and had their signs torn down.  Since the election, there have been McCarthyesk persecutions against pro-8 people.  It appears to most neutral people that the claims of the pr0-8 people were understated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What lies did the prop 8 people make?  Please document why the statement was a lie.  For instance, I&#8217;ve heard over and over that school curriculums would not be affected by governmental recognition of same-sex marriage, but then there were at least two high profile examples of schools who 1) had a field trip to a same-sex marriage (1st graders) and 2) had children sign a pledge to not use LGBT slurs (kindergartners-you can&#8217;t have them sign something like this without explaining what LGBT stands for).  Also, it is true that the Catholic charities had to shut down their adoption agency because the State was forcing them to adopt to same-sex married couples.  It is a fact that pro-8 people were called &#8220;bigots&#8221;, filled with &#8220;hate&#8221;, and had their signs torn down.  Since the election, there have been McCarthyesk persecutions against pro-8 people.  It appears to most neutral people that the claims of the pr0-8 people were understated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NICNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99794</link>
		<dc:creator>NICNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99794</guid>
		<description>i admire and respect the HRC for their constant efforts to protect and advance the rights of LGBT Americans. However, I am not a fan of Joe Solmonese and I do not think he should be the executive/leader of the HRC. In my opinion, Solmonese is &#039;dry toast&#039; - he is boring, uninspiring and vapid. I cannot think of a single significant thing he has done for the LGBT community during his tenure as executive of the HRC. He is not someone who should be a leader of the LGBT rights movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i admire and respect the HRC for their constant efforts to protect and advance the rights of LGBT Americans. However, I am not a fan of Joe Solmonese and I do not think he should be the executive/leader of the HRC. In my opinion, Solmonese is &#8216;dry toast&#8217; &#8211; he is boring, uninspiring and vapid. I cannot think of a single significant thing he has done for the LGBT community during his tenure as executive of the HRC. He is not someone who should be a leader of the LGBT rights movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99563</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99563</guid>
		<description>My sentiments exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sentiments exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgusted American</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99425</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgusted American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99425</guid>
		<description>Im not sure what HRC did or Did NOT do..to help fight this blatant H8 prop....but in my opinion...IF Harvey Milk were around, he&#039;s slap the shit out of Joe Solomenese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im not sure what HRC did or Did NOT do..to help fight this blatant H8 prop&#8230;.but in my opinion&#8230;IF Harvey Milk were around, he&#8217;s slap the shit out of Joe Solomenese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99253</link>
		<dc:creator>lyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99253</guid>
		<description>These are some fags I encourage folks to bash.

Let the Homobigots rights Campaign burn and die the death it deserves.

Transfolks and those LGB types deserve nothing less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some fags I encourage folks to bash.</p>
<p>Let the Homobigots rights Campaign burn and die the death it deserves.</p>
<p>Transfolks and those LGB types deserve nothing less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCnNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99143</link>
		<dc:creator>MCnNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99143</guid>
		<description>FIrst off thank you John in SF for your commentary in regards to the tone.
But I have to say reading a few of the blogs comments on this topic by FAR this one has been the most constructive.
Now to AL I&#039;m really not sure what the ZAPS and street closings church disruptions did to help on issues of gay adoption or changing the workplace towards a more open envirinment.
Look Stonewall, ACT UP QUEER NATION helped achieve very strategic gains. And in ACT UP helped speed up and change the dialogue around the AIDS crisis.  But there are new issues now.
And some don&#039;t even think that marriage should even be a part of the adgenda.  Hey Queer Nation activists--how about marriage? FU! So maybe you are more suited to throwing bricks at building and smashing a few skulls--hell the Black Panthers were instumental in the 60&#039;s!!
But maybe others who share the same goals are more suited in other ways in caring out those goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIrst off thank you John in SF for your commentary in regards to the tone.<br />
But I have to say reading a few of the blogs comments on this topic by FAR this one has been the most constructive.<br />
Now to AL I&#8217;m really not sure what the ZAPS and street closings church disruptions did to help on issues of gay adoption or changing the workplace towards a more open envirinment.<br />
Look Stonewall, ACT UP QUEER NATION helped achieve very strategic gains. And in ACT UP helped speed up and change the dialogue around the AIDS crisis.  But there are new issues now.<br />
And some don&#8217;t even think that marriage should even be a part of the adgenda.  Hey Queer Nation activists&#8211;how about marriage? FU! So maybe you are more suited to throwing bricks at building and smashing a few skulls&#8211;hell the Black Panthers were instumental in the 60&#8242;s!!<br />
But maybe others who share the same goals are more suited in other ways in caring out those goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack E. Jett</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack E. Jett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99138</guid>
		<description>I thought the HRC was an overpriced catering company that provided rubber chicken dinners to 
relieve homophobes of some guilt.

I know here in Dallas, a company that buys a table at the Black Tie HRC dinner think they have carte blanche to gay bashing comments the rest of the year.

BTW did you know that Andrew Sullivan was on the list with Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and other right wingers that CBS planned to hire for a Bush cover up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the HRC was an overpriced catering company that provided rubber chicken dinners to<br />
relieve homophobes of some guilt.</p>
<p>I know here in Dallas, a company that buys a table at the Black Tie HRC dinner think they have carte blanche to gay bashing comments the rest of the year.</p>
<p>BTW did you know that Andrew Sullivan was on the list with Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and other right wingers that CBS planned to hire for a Bush cover up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99080</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99080</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-99025&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Al Benson&lt;/a&gt;: 

Al you misquoted me.

I did not write that HRC was tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.  You added HRC to that part of the sentence.  What I said is that the leaders of the campaign against 8 --- EQCA and NCLR (and their partner organizations) --- have been tremendously successful at achieving equality.  

HRC did not win marriage in the California Supreme Court.  EQCA and NCLR (and several partner organizations) did.

HRC did not win domestic partnerships in CA.  EQCA did.

I call that pretty successful.  You may disagree with me, and that is fine, but my opinion is that these leaders have a proven history of moving the legislature, the courts, and the people towards the direction of LGBT equality.  It is my opinion that to throw them out --- as many posts on this page suggest --- would be disasterous for our movement.

On a personal note - I&#039;m OK with being disagreed with, but I don&#039;t think it is necessary to sling personal insults into the mix by asking if I am high. I can live with that question just fine, but it is just the latest example of how some folks are choosing to move from disagreement about tactics and strategies and into personal attacks. It is really self-destuctive.

Again, let us BUILD UP not TEAR DOWN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-99025" rel="nofollow">Al Benson</a>: </p>
<p>Al you misquoted me.</p>
<p>I did not write that HRC was tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.  You added HRC to that part of the sentence.  What I said is that the leaders of the campaign against 8 &#8212; EQCA and NCLR (and their partner organizations) &#8212; have been tremendously successful at achieving equality.  </p>
<p>HRC did not win marriage in the California Supreme Court.  EQCA and NCLR (and several partner organizations) did.</p>
<p>HRC did not win domestic partnerships in CA.  EQCA did.</p>
<p>I call that pretty successful.  You may disagree with me, and that is fine, but my opinion is that these leaders have a proven history of moving the legislature, the courts, and the people towards the direction of LGBT equality.  It is my opinion that to throw them out &#8212; as many posts on this page suggest &#8212; would be disasterous for our movement.</p>
<p>On a personal note &#8211; I&#8217;m OK with being disagreed with, but I don&#8217;t think it is necessary to sling personal insults into the mix by asking if I am high. I can live with that question just fine, but it is just the latest example of how some folks are choosing to move from disagreement about tactics and strategies and into personal attacks. It is really self-destuctive.</p>
<p>Again, let us BUILD UP not TEAR DOWN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-99025</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-99025</guid>
		<description>John in SF sez:  [HRC] by every other measure have been tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.

Are you high? The events who have achieved success in gay equality have been first and foremost the Stonewall RIOTS, the Act-UP DEMONSTRATIONS, ZAPS, STREET CLOSURES and finally the independently organized mass movements of this past 12 days. 

Not a single thing was done by a long list of passive defeat-habituated no-longer leaders including HRC and The Gay center here in LA.

The reality is that it&#039;s over for them. Like a ponderous dinosaur, it will take some time for the news to reach their brains. 

Perhaps the election of Obama portends more then anyone suspects in terms of clearing the decks of the old ineffectual politics and making way for the new. ....oh yeah an &#039;honorable&#039; mention: so HRC has 700,000 plus members and supporters...well a web site that accepted only a single dollar donation from each could have buried the Mormon and Catholic efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John in SF sez:  [HRC] by every other measure have been tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.</p>
<p>Are you high? The events who have achieved success in gay equality have been first and foremost the Stonewall RIOTS, the Act-UP DEMONSTRATIONS, ZAPS, STREET CLOSURES and finally the independently organized mass movements of this past 12 days. </p>
<p>Not a single thing was done by a long list of passive defeat-habituated no-longer leaders including HRC and The Gay center here in LA.</p>
<p>The reality is that it&#8217;s over for them. Like a ponderous dinosaur, it will take some time for the news to reach their brains. </p>
<p>Perhaps the election of Obama portends more then anyone suspects in terms of clearing the decks of the old ineffectual politics and making way for the new. &#8230;.oh yeah an &#8216;honorable&#8217; mention: so HRC has 700,000 plus members and supporters&#8230;well a web site that accepted only a single dollar donation from each could have buried the Mormon and Catholic efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macNnyc</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98985</link>
		<dc:creator>macNnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98985</guid>
		<description>@BrendonD.  Did you see most of the signs at this past rally?
LOVE was in a lot of the signs. And that letter also qouted MLK critisied the Catholic Church as well as the LDS anyone else even mentioning the Catholics? NO the dirty shameful secret is we swat at the easy targets --our own and the marginal religions. 
We need all hands on deck. 
And we need to prioritize our agenda. 
And on the Fed level it&#039;s not Marriage Equality. 
So what do we want.....and when can we get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BrendonD.  Did you see most of the signs at this past rally?<br />
LOVE was in a lot of the signs. And that letter also qouted MLK critisied the Catholic Church as well as the LDS anyone else even mentioning the Catholics? NO the dirty shameful secret is we swat at the easy targets &#8211;our own and the marginal religions.<br />
We need all hands on deck.<br />
And we need to prioritize our agenda.<br />
And on the Fed level it&#8217;s not Marriage Equality.<br />
So what do we want&#8230;..and when can we get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter Better</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98966</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98966</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t like them don&#039;t give them money.  Its America, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t like them don&#8217;t give them money.  Its America, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie Hewes</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98959</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie Hewes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98959</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that the HRC have got to go, it&#039;s that new leaders need to stand up. We need to stop looking to our great leaders to make it all OK, and do stuff ourselves. We don&#039;t need their permission or backing, as this Saturday shows, all you need is a flippin website!

ANY of us could be leaders, ANY of us could revitalise the movement. Stop complaining and set up a mailinglist for the people who were out there this weekend. Next time you want some people to show up somewhere, all you have to do is send them an e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that the HRC have got to go, it&#8217;s that new leaders need to stand up. We need to stop looking to our great leaders to make it all OK, and do stuff ourselves. We don&#8217;t need their permission or backing, as this Saturday shows, all you need is a flippin website!</p>
<p>ANY of us could be leaders, ANY of us could revitalise the movement. Stop complaining and set up a mailinglist for the people who were out there this weekend. Next time you want some people to show up somewhere, all you have to do is send them an e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98935</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98935</guid>
		<description>I wonder if HRC raises more money every time Sullivan criticizes them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if HRC raises more money every time Sullivan criticizes them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandalphon</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98917</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandalphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98917</guid>
		<description>It is just the same in the UK,  the LGBT groups like stonewall, they do not really represent gay rights anymore, and people are complaining.  Most gay groups are not what they should be anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just the same in the UK,  the LGBT groups like stonewall, they do not really represent gay rights anymore, and people are complaining.  Most gay groups are not what they should be anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98888</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98888</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-98887&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mark&lt;/a&gt;: 

Splendiferous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-98887" rel="nofollow">mark</a>: </p>
<p>Splendiferous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98887</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98887</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give my funds to AIDS shelters, Victory fund, Lambda Legal, Emily&#039;s List</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give my funds to AIDS shelters, Victory fund, Lambda Legal, Emily&#8217;s List</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98885</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98885</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-98876&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mark&lt;/a&gt;: Again, I agree that HRC has a lot to be desired, especially given the money and trust that has been invested in it.  But I also have to say that we should be at least as vigorous at SUPPORTING those organizations that DO work, as we are at criticizing those that don&#039;t.  

EQCA (and equivalent organizations in many states) build broad based coalitions and GET MANY BILLS INTO LAW, including a domestic partnership law in CA that is the full equivalent of marriage (save the name). EQCA was one of the plaintiffs in the marriage case in CA that ultimately recognized the constitutional right to marry.

NCLR, who&#039;s legal work WON THE RIGHT to MARRY in California...and who advocates for hundreds of LGBT individuals and families across the country.

Equality Federation...which ensures that what is learned in California (and other states) doesn&#039;t stay in California.

Dollar for dollar, these organizations are unbelievably effective at securing our rights. 

Lastly - I love Horizons Foundation which was one of the major contributors to no on 8 - EVEN BEFORE it was on the ballot, and which supports hundreds of LGBT organizations -  in the Bay Area and nationally.

There are MANY other orgs worthy of our support. I believe that if donors gave EVEN HALF of what they give to HRC to these effective organizations, that we would win marriage nationwide in less than 10 years - even after the prop 8 defeat!

Let&#039;s spend our energy to BUILD UP, not TEAR DOWN---

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-98876" rel="nofollow">mark</a>: Again, I agree that HRC has a lot to be desired, especially given the money and trust that has been invested in it.  But I also have to say that we should be at least as vigorous at SUPPORTING those organizations that DO work, as we are at criticizing those that don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>EQCA (and equivalent organizations in many states) build broad based coalitions and GET MANY BILLS INTO LAW, including a domestic partnership law in CA that is the full equivalent of marriage (save the name). EQCA was one of the plaintiffs in the marriage case in CA that ultimately recognized the constitutional right to marry.</p>
<p>NCLR, who&#8217;s legal work WON THE RIGHT to MARRY in California&#8230;and who advocates for hundreds of LGBT individuals and families across the country.</p>
<p>Equality Federation&#8230;which ensures that what is learned in California (and other states) doesn&#8217;t stay in California.</p>
<p>Dollar for dollar, these organizations are unbelievably effective at securing our rights. </p>
<p>Lastly &#8211; I love Horizons Foundation which was one of the major contributors to no on 8 &#8211; EVEN BEFORE it was on the ballot, and which supports hundreds of LGBT organizations &#8211;  in the Bay Area and nationally.</p>
<p>There are MANY other orgs worthy of our support. I believe that if donors gave EVEN HALF of what they give to HRC to these effective organizations, that we would win marriage nationwide in less than 10 years &#8211; even after the prop 8 defeat!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s spend our energy to BUILD UP, not TEAR DOWN&#8212;</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98876</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98876</guid>
		<description>I quit supporting HRC when they supported non inclusive ENDA, I had supported HRC for twenty years prior to that, it was the LAST STRAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quit supporting HRC when they supported non inclusive ENDA, I had supported HRC for twenty years prior to that, it was the LAST STRAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan D.</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98866</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98866</guid>
		<description>Most of the complaints I have about HRC have already been addressed here, so I&#039;ll just add this little tidbit, which I have not heard mentioned on many queer blogs: The HRC recently sent out e-mails asking its members to pledge to be &quot;extremists for love.&quot; So, even when HRC tries to harness itself to the power of grassroots anger, they still come off sounding stilted and completely silly. HRC needs to sort its life out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the complaints I have about HRC have already been addressed here, so I&#8217;ll just add this little tidbit, which I have not heard mentioned on many queer blogs: The HRC recently sent out e-mails asking its members to pledge to be &#8220;extremists for love.&#8221; So, even when HRC tries to harness itself to the power of grassroots anger, they still come off sounding stilted and completely silly. HRC needs to sort its life out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan D.</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98865</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98865</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-98771&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;: Ken, I beg to differ. Stonewall WAS a &quot;skanky queer liberation.&quot; Stonewall was a sleazy, shithole bar full of poorer, more radically un-heteronormative types, including drag queens and other gender non-conformists. Do you know where the wealthy, &quot;passing&quot; gays were that weekend? Fire island. Do you know what their response was when they heard about the riots? They were horrified. They thought that this was going to set the movement back, precisely because of how shockingly queer the participants were. So remember, before you go bandying Stonewall about in our faces, remember that is was a radical action, not a respectable one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-98771" rel="nofollow">Ken</a>: Ken, I beg to differ. Stonewall WAS a &#8220;skanky queer liberation.&#8221; Stonewall was a sleazy, shithole bar full of poorer, more radically un-heteronormative types, including drag queens and other gender non-conformists. Do you know where the wealthy, &#8220;passing&#8221; gays were that weekend? Fire island. Do you know what their response was when they heard about the riots? They were horrified. They thought that this was going to set the movement back, precisely because of how shockingly queer the participants were. So remember, before you go bandying Stonewall about in our faces, remember that is was a radical action, not a respectable one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSnitch</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98854</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSnitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98854</guid>
		<description>********* ATTENTION GAYS / HATE SITE ALERT **************
This Website 
http://americansfortruth.com/membership.php

spreads HATE about gay people and has nudity on their site from the Folsom Street fair as &quot;examples&quot; of how &quot;perverse&quot; we are.

They are asking for Donations through PAYPAL.

** Complain and report them to PAYPAL at aupviolations@paypal.com and compliance@paypal.com let&#039;s have their PAYPAL ACCOUNT taken away from them for &quot;TERMS OF SERVICE&quot; violations.

Paypal TOS clearly state there is to be no pornography /nudity , or Hate involved in the use of their service  *see*  http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/ua/use/index_frame-outside</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>********* ATTENTION GAYS / HATE SITE ALERT **************<br />
This Website<br />
<a href="http://americansfortruth.com/membership.php" rel="nofollow">http://americansfortruth.com/membership.php</a></p>
<p>spreads HATE about gay people and has nudity on their site from the Folsom Street fair as &#8220;examples&#8221; of how &#8220;perverse&#8221; we are.</p>
<p>They are asking for Donations through PAYPAL.</p>
<p>** Complain and report them to PAYPAL at <a href="mailto:aupviolations@paypal.com">aupviolations@paypal.com</a> and <a href="mailto:compliance@paypal.com">compliance@paypal.com</a> let&#8217;s have their PAYPAL ACCOUNT taken away from them for &#8220;TERMS OF SERVICE&#8221; violations.</p>
<p>Paypal TOS clearly state there is to be no pornography /nudity , or Hate involved in the use of their service  *see*  <a href="http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/ua/use/index_frame-outside" rel="nofollow">http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/.....me-outside</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: go to girl</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98851</link>
		<dc:creator>go to girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98851</guid>
		<description>Having worked with HRC and GLAAD I can honestly say that I found the mission for both organizations to be about paying the salaries of those employed at the organizations and not for helping the community.  Solmonese &amp; Giuliano are mouth pieces making over 6 figure salaries just trying to figure out their next career moves and ignoring what is needed by the community right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked with HRC and GLAAD I can honestly say that I found the mission for both organizations to be about paying the salaries of those employed at the organizations and not for helping the community.  Solmonese &amp; Giuliano are mouth pieces making over 6 figure salaries just trying to figure out their next career moves and ignoring what is needed by the community right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaroslaw</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaroslaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98843</guid>
		<description>@Joe the Gay - I can&#039;t dispute your story - and I&#039;m sorry. I have always found HRC to be responsive and I&#039;ll illustrate by anecdote.  My dad worked for Big Brothers (later BB/Big Sisters) for almost 18 years, 10-12 hour days).  He did major fundraisers on top of that to keep it going.  My favorite was the Gary Shope concert.  The place was packed.  But if you ask any number of people around that city &quot;what did BB/BS do&quot; probably 3/4 of them would say not much.  The point is we need the front lines, the legislative lobbyist, everything.  HRC is a part of the movement and a good part, I think.  Happy to be a contributor to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe the Gay &#8211; I can&#8217;t dispute your story &#8211; and I&#8217;m sorry. I have always found HRC to be responsive and I&#8217;ll illustrate by anecdote.  My dad worked for Big Brothers (later BB/Big Sisters) for almost 18 years, 10-12 hour days).  He did major fundraisers on top of that to keep it going.  My favorite was the Gary Shope concert.  The place was packed.  But if you ask any number of people around that city &#8220;what did BB/BS do&#8221; probably 3/4 of them would say not much.  The point is we need the front lines, the legislative lobbyist, everything.  HRC is a part of the movement and a good part, I think.  Happy to be a contributor to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoetheGay</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98824</link>
		<dc:creator>JoetheGay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98824</guid>
		<description>I live in Washington DC and it took 6 months of writing the HRC, calling the HRC, basically stalking the HRC for them to finally tell me how I could volunteer for them. I am a college graduate in GLBT studies mind you and yet even after stalking the HRC to volunteer the only avenue to volunteer is a Wednesday night where they either let you stuff envelopes or put pins on letters.  

!!THE HRC  IS A MIS MANAGED JOKE!!

Not only was the organization a quiet bystander on Saturday&#039;s Protests they actually debated making a statement separating themselves from it due to a few anti-religious/racist  remarks made in some of the California protests.  It is clear we need new leadership that understand the GLBT community, one that reflects the energy we need.  Without change I doubt we will see equality in our lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Washington DC and it took 6 months of writing the HRC, calling the HRC, basically stalking the HRC for them to finally tell me how I could volunteer for them. I am a college graduate in GLBT studies mind you and yet even after stalking the HRC to volunteer the only avenue to volunteer is a Wednesday night where they either let you stuff envelopes or put pins on letters.  </p>
<p>!!THE HRC  IS A MIS MANAGED JOKE!!</p>
<p>Not only was the organization a quiet bystander on Saturday&#8217;s Protests they actually debated making a statement separating themselves from it due to a few anti-religious/racist  remarks made in some of the California protests.  It is clear we need new leadership that understand the GLBT community, one that reflects the energy we need.  Without change I doubt we will see equality in our lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCnNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98787</link>
		<dc:creator>MCnNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98787</guid>
		<description>Actually Tom you are a bit mistaken.
You can donate to the HRC Foundation which does most of the work you are referring to.
Those contributions are also tax deductable.
The capital campaign for the &quot;building&quot; you refer to is finished.
(for the record I am a Federal Club member) and I&#039;m sorry you recieved that misinformation.
For the web:The HRC Foundation is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization. Programs funded in part or in full through the HRC Foundation include:
The HRC Workplace Project
The HRC Religion and Faith Program
The HRC Historically Black Colleges and Universities Outreach Program
The HRC Family Project

They have also started work on something new this summer along the lines of the Business/Corporate program.  They found that a lot of hospitals do not recognise same sex rights so they are hoping to start the same type of program where hospitals can ask to be rated and then if they pass certain criteria will get an positive index. anyway if you are interested  by looking here 

http://www.hrc.org/about_us/hrc-foundation.asp

Or you could just take Andrew Sullivan&#039;s word for it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Tom you are a bit mistaken.<br />
You can donate to the HRC Foundation which does most of the work you are referring to.<br />
Those contributions are also tax deductable.<br />
The capital campaign for the &#8220;building&#8221; you refer to is finished.<br />
(for the record I am a Federal Club member) and I&#8217;m sorry you recieved that misinformation.<br />
For the web:The HRC Foundation is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization. Programs funded in part or in full through the HRC Foundation include:<br />
The HRC Workplace Project<br />
The HRC Religion and Faith Program<br />
The HRC Historically Black Colleges and Universities Outreach Program<br />
The HRC Family Project</p>
<p>They have also started work on something new this summer along the lines of the Business/Corporate program.  They found that a lot of hospitals do not recognise same sex rights so they are hoping to start the same type of program where hospitals can ask to be rated and then if they pass certain criteria will get an positive index. anyway if you are interested  by looking here </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hrc.org/about_us/hrc-foundation.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.hrc.org/about_us/hrc-foundation.asp</a></p>
<p>Or you could just take Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s word for it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Lazybrook</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Lazybrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98777</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t give anymore to HRC.  I stopped giving a long time ago as I feel that that issuing &#039;press releases&#039; that are read by nobody aren&#039;t cutting it.  

I tried to look at the bright side of HRC. Their &#039;worknet&#039; program of lobbying corporations for equal benefits has been relatively successful.  So I asked how I could donate to HRC&#039;s worknet program without having my money go towards their building, their black tie dinners, and their &#039;press releases&#039;.  I was told that I&#039;d have to donate in excess of $5000 to be able to specify my donation.  So they get nothing.

But one thing they CAN do is to add a new score of -20 points on their equality index to any employer that specifically recruits at schools where Gay couples can not be students (unless they have a one for one affirmative action policy).  In that way, companies would be penalized for discriminating against Gay couples through recruiting at schools such as BYU in order to &#039;weed out&#039; Gay people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give anymore to HRC.  I stopped giving a long time ago as I feel that that issuing &#8216;press releases&#8217; that are read by nobody aren&#8217;t cutting it.  </p>
<p>I tried to look at the bright side of HRC. Their &#8216;worknet&#8217; program of lobbying corporations for equal benefits has been relatively successful.  So I asked how I could donate to HRC&#8217;s worknet program without having my money go towards their building, their black tie dinners, and their &#8216;press releases&#8217;.  I was told that I&#8217;d have to donate in excess of $5000 to be able to specify my donation.  So they get nothing.</p>
<p>But one thing they CAN do is to add a new score of -20 points on their equality index to any employer that specifically recruits at schools where Gay couples can not be students (unless they have a one for one affirmative action policy).  In that way, companies would be penalized for discriminating against Gay couples through recruiting at schools such as BYU in order to &#8216;weed out&#8217; Gay people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98771</guid>
		<description>Well Stonewall was the catalyst that launched the imagination of millions of Gay men and Woman globally and it was as &#039;Gay Liberation&#039; not some skanky queer liberation that led the initial post riot charge. There is no excuse in legitimizing a hated slur term it disrespects those men who were brutalized or murdered while having it spat at them it&#039;s not revolutionary why it&#039;s not even clever, Gay Liberation cleverly negated slur terms like queer and not legitimized them, the argument still going over nigger is equally applicable to slur terms like queer, would have Rosa Parkes as an African American woman have lovingly termed her self a â€˜niggerâ€™? I doubt it so why do so many intellectual &amp; philosophical lightweights in the â€˜Gay worldâ€™ think they have the right to wholesale brand all homosexual people as â€˜queerâ€™ there has not been our approval or consent just a railroading of their limited values over the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Stonewall was the catalyst that launched the imagination of millions of Gay men and Woman globally and it was as &#8216;Gay Liberation&#8217; not some skanky queer liberation that led the initial post riot charge. There is no excuse in legitimizing a hated slur term it disrespects those men who were brutalized or murdered while having it spat at them it&#8217;s not revolutionary why it&#8217;s not even clever, Gay Liberation cleverly negated slur terms like queer and not legitimized them, the argument still going over nigger is equally applicable to slur terms like queer, would have Rosa Parkes as an African American woman have lovingly termed her self a â€˜niggerâ€™? I doubt it so why do so many intellectual &amp; philosophical lightweights in the â€˜Gay worldâ€™ think they have the right to wholesale brand all homosexual people as â€˜queerâ€™ there has not been our approval or consent just a railroading of their limited values over the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98766</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98766</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-98756&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cgone&lt;/a&gt;: Agreed.  And to amplify - I would offer that I&#039;d been a volunteer with the campaign since Gay Pride in June.  I&#039;ve walked streets, called supporters and undecided voters, emailed like a fiend, and used Facebook to constantly make a plea for volunteers and donations ... so we could reach all those folks before the Yes on 8 folks besieged them with lies.  In 5 months, I succeeded in pursuading maybe 4 people to volunteer, each of whom spent maybe 6 hours working.  Only one of my friends spent any significant amount of time volunteering before the last 2 weeks of the campaign as a result of my invitations.

Then we lose the election, and suddenly everybody is sending invitations to join dozens of anti-8 Facebook groups, and marches up and down San Francisco.  This is a GREAT thing, mind you.  But if more folks had responded to my pleas in July, in August, in September, and in October, then maybe we would be attending wedding receptions in November instead of demonstrations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-98756" rel="nofollow">Cgone</a>: Agreed.  And to amplify &#8211; I would offer that I&#8217;d been a volunteer with the campaign since Gay Pride in June.  I&#8217;ve walked streets, called supporters and undecided voters, emailed like a fiend, and used Facebook to constantly make a plea for volunteers and donations &#8230; so we could reach all those folks before the Yes on 8 folks besieged them with lies.  In 5 months, I succeeded in pursuading maybe 4 people to volunteer, each of whom spent maybe 6 hours working.  Only one of my friends spent any significant amount of time volunteering before the last 2 weeks of the campaign as a result of my invitations.</p>
<p>Then we lose the election, and suddenly everybody is sending invitations to join dozens of anti-8 Facebook groups, and marches up and down San Francisco.  This is a GREAT thing, mind you.  But if more folks had responded to my pleas in July, in August, in September, and in October, then maybe we would be attending wedding receptions in November instead of demonstrations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98762</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98762</guid>
		<description>Indeed, just because Sulivan says it, doesn&#039;t make it wrong! Although it suprises me that after all of his harping about gay liberation being dead he would sugggest someting as potentially post Stonewall as a grassroots movement. We need to put an end to this mainstreaming political rigamarol, and get everyone with a voice raging about all forms of stigmatization queer people suffer.

The HRC has less money because they can&#039;t convince anyone who would give it to them that they have the gumption and strategy to do anything, or take postures that represent something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, just because Sulivan says it, doesn&#8217;t make it wrong! Although it suprises me that after all of his harping about gay liberation being dead he would sugggest someting as potentially post Stonewall as a grassroots movement. We need to put an end to this mainstreaming political rigamarol, and get everyone with a voice raging about all forms of stigmatization queer people suffer.</p>
<p>The HRC has less money because they can&#8217;t convince anyone who would give it to them that they have the gumption and strategy to do anything, or take postures that represent something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cgone</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98756</link>
		<dc:creator>Cgone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98756</guid>
		<description>Our community is only as good as the individuals who comprise it. There are tremendous minds working at every organization mentioned in the comments. There are evangelists and people who work tirelessly across the board for HRC, NCLR, GLAAD, the No on 8 Campaign, Equality California, Lambda Legal, SLDN, EVERYWHERE.  It is about time we stop asking &quot;Why No on 8 did&quot; or &quot;didn&#039;t&quot; do something and start asking why it took the Passage of Prop 8 for the gay community to care. Had every attendee of a national protest made 10 phone calls to family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, classmates, etc, things may be different. The reality is, we suffered a tremendous loss and we need to take a step back and review our strategy across the nation. Wanda was right, we won&#039;t stop until we have equality across the board. We have galvanized the community - let&#039;s stop playing the blame game and start building a solution. Let&#039;s take some of the lessons that every comment on here reflects and figure out how to pass ENDA and kill DADT and continue the marriage fight with some wins in VT and NY and NJ so that in 2010, California tips the scales so every state and every American thinks marriage equality should be given...A little less focus on what to wear for Halloween and a little more focus on persuading America so that we win each of these these battles.

Is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our community is only as good as the individuals who comprise it. There are tremendous minds working at every organization mentioned in the comments. There are evangelists and people who work tirelessly across the board for HRC, NCLR, GLAAD, the No on 8 Campaign, Equality California, Lambda Legal, SLDN, EVERYWHERE.  It is about time we stop asking &#8220;Why No on 8 did&#8221; or &#8220;didn&#8217;t&#8221; do something and start asking why it took the Passage of Prop 8 for the gay community to care. Had every attendee of a national protest made 10 phone calls to family, friends, co-workers, neighbors, classmates, etc, things may be different. The reality is, we suffered a tremendous loss and we need to take a step back and review our strategy across the nation. Wanda was right, we won&#8217;t stop until we have equality across the board. We have galvanized the community &#8211; let&#8217;s stop playing the blame game and start building a solution. Let&#8217;s take some of the lessons that every comment on here reflects and figure out how to pass ENDA and kill DADT and continue the marriage fight with some wins in VT and NY and NJ so that in 2010, California tips the scales so every state and every American thinks marriage equality should be given&#8230;A little less focus on what to wear for Halloween and a little more focus on persuading America so that we win each of these these battles.</p>
<p>Is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98749</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98749</guid>
		<description>Our movement has been spearheaded by well-meaning, but fancy, types who think that raising enough money alone solves the problem.  Seriously, that&#039;s exactly what No on 8 has said all along...we&#039;ll win if we throw the most lavish fundraisers, and from what I&#039;ve gathered, HRC holds the same types of views.  Let&#039;s call it the Log Cabin School of Civil Rights.

Bear this in mind everyone:  we did not lose for a lack of funds or because the other side raised so much money.  We lost because people are still willing to accept the LIES that all fundamentalist, evangelical demagogues throw their way.  Sunday mornings were much bigger advertising opportunities than anything on television.  And we should&#039;ve been there outside those churches EVERY Sunday morning since May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our movement has been spearheaded by well-meaning, but fancy, types who think that raising enough money alone solves the problem.  Seriously, that&#8217;s exactly what No on 8 has said all along&#8230;we&#8217;ll win if we throw the most lavish fundraisers, and from what I&#8217;ve gathered, HRC holds the same types of views.  Let&#8217;s call it the Log Cabin School of Civil Rights.</p>
<p>Bear this in mind everyone:  we did not lose for a lack of funds or because the other side raised so much money.  We lost because people are still willing to accept the LIES that all fundamentalist, evangelical demagogues throw their way.  Sunday mornings were much bigger advertising opportunities than anything on television.  And we should&#8217;ve been there outside those churches EVERY Sunday morning since May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in SF</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98746</link>
		<dc:creator>John in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98746</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why there is so much energy spent on a) criticizing HRC about Prop 8 and b) wanting to throw out the leaders of the campaign against 8 - who by every other measure have been tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.

HRC was part of the coalition fighting 8, but they were not central to that fight.  Had we won, they could not have taken  much credit and now that we lost, they should not be blamed for it either.  (I&#039;m not a particularly big fan of HRC, and I&#039;m not a donor, for the record).

The folks who were much more central to the fight against 8 were the National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality California.  While folks may want to blame them and the supposed lack of leadership, you would be kicking out the folks who WON marriage in the CA Supreme Court in the first place.  You would be kicking out the folks who moved the California electorate EIGHTEEN POINTS since the beginning of the decade - when Prop 22 passed (which had identical language to Prop 8) Lastly, you would be kicking out the folks who won domestic partnerships that confer all the rights and priviledges of marriage (excep the name), as well as DOZENS of other bills.  

Why would anyone want to replace or punish such fantastically successful advocates?  We should all write checks TODAY to keep NCLR and EQCA going strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why there is so much energy spent on a) criticizing HRC about Prop 8 and b) wanting to throw out the leaders of the campaign against 8 &#8211; who by every other measure have been tremendously successful at achieving LGBT equality.</p>
<p>HRC was part of the coalition fighting 8, but they were not central to that fight.  Had we won, they could not have taken  much credit and now that we lost, they should not be blamed for it either.  (I&#8217;m not a particularly big fan of HRC, and I&#8217;m not a donor, for the record).</p>
<p>The folks who were much more central to the fight against 8 were the National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality California.  While folks may want to blame them and the supposed lack of leadership, you would be kicking out the folks who WON marriage in the CA Supreme Court in the first place.  You would be kicking out the folks who moved the California electorate EIGHTEEN POINTS since the beginning of the decade &#8211; when Prop 22 passed (which had identical language to Prop 8) Lastly, you would be kicking out the folks who won domestic partnerships that confer all the rights and priviledges of marriage (excep the name), as well as DOZENS of other bills.  </p>
<p>Why would anyone want to replace or punish such fantastically successful advocates?  We should all write checks TODAY to keep NCLR and EQCA going strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legin</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98738</link>
		<dc:creator>Legin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98738</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t comment specifically on HRC or any of the national groups but I do have a problem with the no on 8 campaign itself. It seems that people were so scared of putting the gay community forward as a legitimate and viable constituent of the nation that their ads were devoid of anything that remotely resembled the community, even to the point of not depicting any actual gay people or mentioning the word gay. This has got to be a lessson. If we come across as being ashamed of ourselves then how can we expect others to respect us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t comment specifically on HRC or any of the national groups but I do have a problem with the no on 8 campaign itself. It seems that people were so scared of putting the gay community forward as a legitimate and viable constituent of the nation that their ads were devoid of anything that remotely resembled the community, even to the point of not depicting any actual gay people or mentioning the word gay. This has got to be a lessson. If we come across as being ashamed of ourselves then how can we expect others to respect us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/do-our-gay-leaders-have-to-go-20081117/#comment-98733</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=33231#comment-98733</guid>
		<description>If gay people were required to give 10% of their earnings to the HRC or whomever &quot;represents&quot; us then maybe we could have raised the amount that the mormons had on hand.  THEY are required to give money to the church, the church decides how they use it, like buying real estate, etc... this time they chose to allocate a huge amount of funds to fight the evil.
Gay people are like everyone else, we are either generous to a fault OR very selfish and let others do our fighting for us...unfortunately I think we found that too many gay people laid back, saved their $25 for more vodka and let the rest of us try to fund the fight.  And when many gay people are self hating, psychological wrecks why expect them to stand up and be proud of who we are as human beings?  
WE WILL prevail in the end, once someone figures out how work the Freedom for all, Equality, principles that the country was founded on angle, I think we might have a chance to come out from under the religious witch-hunters cloak of shame and rule.  Lets face it, for a country who has seperation of religion and state, we sure do require our leaders to be christian....NOT Jewish, not buddhist, not ANYTHING else, you must be full fledged christian and state your love of God and your faith.  WHEN WILL THAT END?  when my President can just run on his abilities and not pander to the religious?  
Is it time for final seperation of church and state yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If gay people were required to give 10% of their earnings to the HRC or whomever &#8220;represents&#8221; us then maybe we could have raised the amount that the mormons had on hand.  THEY are required to give money to the church, the church decides how they use it, like buying real estate, etc&#8230; this time they chose to allocate a huge amount of funds to fight the evil.<br />
Gay people are like everyone else, we are either generous to a fault OR very selfish and let others do our fighting for us&#8230;unfortunately I think we found that too many gay people laid back, saved their $25 for more vodka and let the rest of us try to fund the fight.  And when many gay people are self hating, psychological wrecks why expect them to stand up and be proud of who we are as human beings?<br />
WE WILL prevail in the end, once someone figures out how work the Freedom for all, Equality, principles that the country was founded on angle, I think we might have a chance to come out from under the religious witch-hunters cloak of shame and rule.  Lets face it, for a country who has seperation of religion and state, we sure do require our leaders to be christian&#8230;.NOT Jewish, not buddhist, not ANYTHING else, you must be full fledged christian and state your love of God and your faith.  WHEN WILL THAT END?  when my President can just run on his abilities and not pander to the religious?<br />
Is it time for final seperation of church and state yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

