Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  before + afters

Do You Want the Federal Government to Tax Your Right to Lipo?

Know what’s really scary about the health care reform currently being applauded, and denounced, on the Hill? No, it’s not death panels, or health care rationing, or Medicare cuts, or paying for abortions. It’s the audacity of lawmakers to think they can tax our cosmetic surgery!

Whether you’re getting your nose shaven, your vagina rejuvenated, your crow’s feet stretched, your forehead de-wrinkled, your ass enlarged, and your entire body lifted, expect to pay a 5 percent retainer to the federal government. Part of the Senate’s heath care bill includes a 5 percent tax on all elective cosmetic surgery, with the goal of raising an estimated $6 billion.

And it already has a cute name: “the Botax.”
lipo1

You can be damn sure the plastic surgery lobby — including trade groups like the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons — is already on the defense. They’re arguing that the tax is not a surcharge on the rich who upgrade their bodies, as lawmakers claim, because plenty of lower-earning Americans are also tired of varicose veins. That, and the tax is discriminatory — against women! Since women make up 90 percent of cosmetic surgery patients, the 5 percent levy unfairly targets the fairer sex.

Interesting, then, that it’s the Senate’s women who are expected to cast the deciding votes. Will Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe stand for such aesthetic injustices?

What do you think of this post?
LOL (1) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Nov 24, 2009
Tagged: , ,
13 Comments

No. 1 · Q

are they also considering gender reassignment surgery “elective”? That doesn’t seem right to me

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Brian

Do we really have to see pictures of fat people? Please stop.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 11:27 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Attmay

I’m not even impressed by the post-lipo pic either.

The Federal Government: Never met a private industry they didn’t love…to suck dry.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 11:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · William Day

That guy’s plump, not fat. Trust me, I know fat.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 11:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Adam

That guy barely improved from the first picture to the second; what a waste of money.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 12:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Nick Starr

Where did you get that before/after picture from? No offense but it is pretty standard practice to quote sources of pictures used from other sites, especially if you site runs ads, and takes in revenue.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 12:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Kurt

Best way I can think of to finance health care reform.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 1:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · TimNCGuy

who knew that having liposuction tans your skin too!!!

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 1:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · Fitz · Member · 1601 comments

People are so derisive about cosmetic surgery, but it’s not all Barbie getting big tits and Rachel getting an Irish nose. There are lots of people with mild-moderate disfigurements who benefit greatly from being able to correct them.

Posted: Nov 24, 2009 at 9:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · AndrewW

I guess the picture on the left is the new “average?” No wonder we can’t afford healthcare.

Posted: Nov 25, 2009 at 2:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Anita

Having had cosmetic surgery myself, I think a tax on aesthetic procedures is a fair and practical means of providing necessary medical treatment for those who cannot afford it.

If you have enough money to shell out for cosmetic surgery, you should be paying tax on it. How selfish can we be? This isn’t a matter of discriminating against aesthetics, it’s a tax that should have been in place years ago. As an American, I’m ashamed at how we allow people to die for lack of basic health care.

Posted: Nov 26, 2009 at 7:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Anita

Kurt wrote:

“Best way I can think of to finance health care reform.”

I totally agree with you!

Posted: Nov 26, 2009 at 7:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Fitz · Member · 1601 comments

A better way to fund tax care reform would be more lifestyle taxes… like McDonalds and soda pop, and ETOH. But yea, I don’t mind a reasonable tax on elective cosmetic work. (and yes, I have had a small amount of work done and will have more as I age).

Posted: Nov 26, 2009 at 9:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY