Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  THE SHOT

Drop and Give Me 20 (of Channing)

channinggq1

THE SHOT — G.I. Joe Channing Tatum boosts the military’s homoerotic factor. (Photos: Mario Testino/GQ)

(Click for larger photo)

By:           editor editor
On:           Jul 14, 2009
Tagged: , , ,

  • 19 Comments
    • alan brickman
      alan brickman

      Good work Channing!! workouts do a body good….don’t show your hatefulness and self loathing now for him now…

      Jul 14, 2009 at 12:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jayson
      Jayson

      I’ve never thought twice about him, but he looks so incredibly sexy on that cover…wow!!!!!

      Jul 14, 2009 at 12:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hardmannyc
      hardmannyc

      Waaaaay too much lipstick on that cover shoot? Make-up artists should be shot — they all do that these days. It looks ridiculous!

      Jul 14, 2009 at 1:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Krysan
      Krysan

      I continue to not understand the appeal. He has a hot face, but bodywise, he’s far too emaciated to me. Not to mention the absolute lack of curves.

      Jul 14, 2009 at 2:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • sal(the original)
      sal(the original)

      mmmm

      Jul 14, 2009 at 2:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • iamtoxic
      iamtoxic

      @krysan:
      Curve should only be used to describe women you fat ass

      Jul 14, 2009 at 3:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John Santos
      John Santos

      To hell with his bod, he’s a lousy actor. He’s a goddamned lucky son-of-a-bitch who managed to get a career in Hollywood based on his looks and using gay men in power to further his career and then firing them and moving onto more powerful representation.

      And as far as playing Duke in the GI Joe movie, the English language has yet to create a word to describe just how absurd that idea was.

      Jul 14, 2009 at 4:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Name (required)
      Name (required)

      He’s so hot, but why does he get so fat when he’s not working.

      Jul 14, 2009 at 9:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • cruiser
      cruiser

      That first pic…what can you say, dude has a rockin hot body!

      Jul 14, 2009 at 10:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • galefan2004
      galefan2004

      @hardmannyc: Its not the amount its the color. They used pink on a dude that is so tan that it is completely obvious that his lips are not that color naturally. That makes it look completely obvious that he is wearing lip stick. There is nothing wrong with guys with lip gloss when it actually matches their natural skin tone.

      Jul 15, 2009 at 9:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • galefan2004
      galefan2004

      @Krysan: What exactly are you talking about. He is not emaciated at all. Hell, he doesn’t even have any surface veins. He also has plenty of curves. Not to mention, he is an actor not a model, so lets judge him on his acting ability and appreciate his good looks.

      Jul 15, 2009 at 9:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • galefan2004
      galefan2004

      @iamtoxic: That is so completely untrue, but such a gay sentiment. However, if you wanna know what curves actually look like on men check out Scott from RW: Brooklyn who is muscular as all hell but has an ass to die for.

      Jul 15, 2009 at 9:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • effyew
      effyew

      @iamtoxic: Sure if you have no imagination and define all your adjectives on an outdated, panicked gender binary like some kind of God-fearing, bible thumping (read: ignorant and regressive) Amurrican. You stupid piece of shit.

      Jul 15, 2009 at 10:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Steven
      Steven

      @Krysan: NOT emaciated. Just not very muscular in photo #1.

      Jul 15, 2009 at 4:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • galefan2004
      galefan2004

      @effyew: VERY WELL SAID!

      Jul 15, 2009 at 4:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris
      Chris

      I prefer him with clothes on. Not my type of guy.

      Jul 16, 2009 at 5:05 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • M Shane
      M Shane

      Very Handsome man! As an artist, it seems true that males have a basically more angular shape.Because men are built for strength, angularity is basic to the frame. Some men have wonderful curves on top of that frame. For instance, there is a huge difference in asses; nothing deserves more reverance than a fine ‘high ridding’ bouncy derriere.

      It’s true that women are generally more rounded in frame than men–like pears, and also that they have a fatty layer of flesh over everything.

      I don’t think that a man could be sexier- than C.T,. in that pic
      He’s handsome on the other one but has his sleeves rolled up, like a gay male would.

      Aug 13, 2009 at 11:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • M Shane
      M Shane

      p.s. @ No. 3 · hardmannyc I just saw the real GQcover ; that picture that Queerty put up just looks like he has lipstick on.
      Not so at all for real.

      Aug 13, 2009 at 6:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • M Shane
      M Shane

      Oh while I was looking at Mags, one of teh major ones Advocate or Out was giving makup tip for guys who did feel like being”pretty “in their buziness suits

      Aug 13, 2009 at 7:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.