Morning Goods

Drunk With Pleasure

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next »

Jump to 24 Comments

By: editor editor
On: May 5, 2009
Tagged: Models, Morning Goods, Photos, risque

Email This

24 Comments

No. 1 · Zakakaka
Sooooooooooo gay!

May 5, 2009 at 7:31 am · @Reply ·
No. 2 · james p. p.
LOVE the eyeglass antlers – mainly because they are the most ironic accessory by being both eye protection and an eye hazard.

May 5, 2009 at 8:21 am · @Reply ·
No. 3 · timncguy
finally a man with a perfect amount of body hair and a body that isn’t “overly” muscular. But, the pics don’t let us really enjoy it. Too many accessories.

May 5, 2009 at 8:31 am · @Reply ·
No. 4 · shelby84
I love his hair… and I love that he’s “sooooooo gay!” Put him on plate please.

May 5, 2009 at 8:34 am · @Reply ·
No. 5 · Raven
I’ll chalk this one up to Art with a capital A because most of those outfits are ridiculous.

May 5, 2009 at 8:47 am · @Reply ·
No. 6 · Sug Night
Proof that clothes do NOT make the man…

May 5, 2009 at 9:11 am · @Reply ·
No. 7 · Brad
Exquisite beauty.

May 5, 2009 at 9:25 am · @Reply ·
No. 8 · DCastledc
a little odd, but he’s still hot. Love #2!

May 5, 2009 at 9:45 am · @Reply ·
No. 9 · Giovanni
“Sooooooooooo gay!”

Well then it’s a good thing this is a site for gay men!

May 5, 2009 at 10:01 am · @Reply ·
No. 10 · AJ
Well, I love gay men so…

May 5, 2009 at 10:25 am · @Reply ·
No. 11 · ML
It’s MUCH easier to view the photos here:
http://exterface.com/

May 5, 2009 at 10:26 am · @Reply ·
No. 12 · RichardR
@ML: Thanks, ML, maybe if we keep sabotageing these tedious page clicks the new QT team will get it.

May 5, 2009 at 11:51 am · @Reply ·
No. 13 · atdleft
Why do the editors love to mess with our heads? Yesterday, we had an MG consisting of a cute guy with dull pics. And today? Antlers and silver pants and wild jewelry, oh my! Now if only we had today’s photographer doing yesterday’s MG model… ;-)

May 5, 2009 at 12:04 pm · @Reply ·
No. 14 · joel
French bottom

May 5, 2009 at 12:14 pm · @Reply ·
No. 15 · Maverick69
All I keep thinking is O-N-J’s video for Physical if it were made today.

May 5, 2009 at 2:55 pm · @Reply ·
No. 16 · gray hunt
what were you thinking? Get back to super buff, hairless, handsome men.

May 5, 2009 at 3:51 pm · @Reply ·
No. 17 · Suburban
I agree…these pics aren’t that good. My problem isn’t really with the model. Wait…are these supposed to be silly. Maverick69, that comment made me laugh.

May 5, 2009 at 5:11 pm · @Reply ·
No. 18 · Sam
he’s a male version of “Mademoiselle GaGa”

May 5, 2009 at 10:34 pm · @Reply ·
No. 19 · Suburban
If there was a stylist on this photo shoot then it’s his or her fault. I actually like the last pic just get rid of that stupid shit and show the model. @ Sam…I’ve seen Lady GaGa on LOGO and am surprised that mainstream radio has played her.

May 5, 2009 at 10:44 pm · @Reply ·
No. 20 · alejandro
thanks ML!

May 5, 2009 at 10:57 pm · @Reply ·
No. 21 · hardmannyc
someone please shoot his stylist and put us out of misery.

May 5, 2009 at 11:54 pm · @Reply ·
No. 22 · mb00
@Zakakaka: Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
Why “ssssooooo Gay”? Why not “sssoooo hedious”, “sssooo ugly”, ssssooo many other things than “GAY”. Idiot.

May 5, 2009 at 11:54 pm · @Reply ·
No. 23 · Rikard
Obviously styled for the jewelry and accessories which are, um not realistic for most of us. The model is lovely and the photography and processing are really good. I like the control of a muted color palette. The softness, or smoothing that would make a waxed model look plastic really works with a hairy man. An overly sharp pic of a hairy model can cause a visual crispiness that isn’t appealing.

May 6, 2009 at 6:10 am · @Reply ·
No. 24 · Thumbnailboy
THUMBNAILS!

May 7, 2009 at 8:21 am · @Reply ·