<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Advocate Editor Judy Wieder Didn&#8217;t Mean to Come Off That Bitchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/former-advocate-editor-judy-wieder-didnt-mean-to-come-off-that-bitchy-20091106/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/former-advocate-editor-judy-wieder-didnt-mean-to-come-off-that-bitchy-20091106/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wren Jake Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/former-advocate-editor-judy-wieder-didnt-mean-to-come-off-that-bitchy-20091106/#comment-236938</link>
		<dc:creator>Wren Jake Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73809#comment-236938</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of stupid fs you all are. You don&#039;t spell her name right and try to brag about your journalism and dream on about how the former ed in chief must have read some crapola your wrote and therefore changed her superbly posted piece? Dumbass. No. The HuffPost published an in process version that Ms. Wieder was still unloading into before getting to something she probably wanted to really say. How would you incompetents like to have that happen? Although it is awful enough to read what you purposely post. Read the right piece and get a clue someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of stupid fs you all are. You don&#8217;t spell her name right and try to brag about your journalism and dream on about how the former ed in chief must have read some crapola your wrote and therefore changed her superbly posted piece? Dumbass. No. The HuffPost published an in process version that Ms. Wieder was still unloading into before getting to something she probably wanted to really say. How would you incompetents like to have that happen? Although it is awful enough to read what you purposely post. Read the right piece and get a clue someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardmannyc</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/former-advocate-editor-judy-wieder-didnt-mean-to-come-off-that-bitchy-20091106/#comment-234173</link>
		<dc:creator>hardmannyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73809#comment-234173</guid>
		<description>Judy: Maybe you should apologize for destroying the Advocate with your celebrity starfuck cover stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy: Maybe you should apologize for destroying the Advocate with your celebrity starfuck cover stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dontblamemeivotedforhillary</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/former-advocate-editor-judy-wieder-didnt-mean-to-come-off-that-bitchy-20091106/#comment-233470</link>
		<dc:creator>dontblamemeivotedforhillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=73809#comment-233470</guid>
		<description>But, no-one was listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, no-one was listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

