Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

FOX News: Fair, Balanced and Untrue


This short clip, courtesy of FOX News, makes us laugh hysterically. The “fair and balanced” network went to a Pennsylvania diner to see who was voting for Obama and who was voting for McCain. After a show of hands, the reporter declared it “a split,” although it totally wasn’t. At all.

[via MG]

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Oct 1, 2008
Tagged: , , , , ,
15 Comments

No. 1 · Matt

Um…I may be wrong but I think the reporter was being sarcastic when he said it was split. I mean he said the room was leaning towards Obama and you hear laughter in the background. Personally, I think the best part is the old lady pulling her husband’s hand down when he starts to raise it for McCain.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 9:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · david

Sure it was a split. A 90-10 split, or whatever, but a split noentheless.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 10:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · anokie

Remember Repubs don’t know much about economics/numbers…of course to them it’s a split. 90-10 is the new 50-50. LOL….this was great…and you call this journalism? The lady is awesome…which is really great considering they are older folks so looks good for Obama. YAY!

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 11:23 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Kit

It wasn’t even 90-10. The only one who raises his hand for McCain – at least on camera – is the Fox reporter himself. Pure comedy gold.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 11:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Alan down in Florida

Agree with Matt about the old lady and her husband.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 11:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Trenton

Heehee…Grateful to Matt for making me rewatch it and see the old woman pull her husband’s hand down…Hilarious.

But how sad is it that in the back of my mind I would putit past FOX to coach the crowd to raise their hands for Obama just to raise concern among their viewers, and that she was correcting her senile hubby? I don’t believe that’s the case, but yes…how sad itis that a “news” source has proven to be so deceptive and manipulative that you have to wonder if everything they do is a distortion….of a distortion…of a distortion.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 12:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Trenton

Correction: “But how sad is it that in the back of my mind I wouldn’t put it past FOX…”

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 1:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · Len

Um . . . I don’t see any sarcasm on the part of the reporter.

The laugh, I think, is at the reporter’s expense, not because the room is sharing a joke with him.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 1:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · Mook

What’s even more hilarious about the old woman is once it’s time to vote for obama, both her arms shoot up enthusiastically.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 1:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · angus

A split does not need to be two equal parts.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 6:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Puddy Katz

He meant he split his pants cause he has a boner for McCain.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 7:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Serio Misterio

Idiot. Can’t believe people still watch that crap.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 8:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Thor

Love that elderly couple in the back. They so made my day.

Posted: Oct 1, 2008 at 9:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · fredo777 · Member · 3010 comments

I have to say, there’s something a bit fishy about this one. I do get the feeling that maybe something was rehearsed beforehand. Not that a roomful of random persons couldn’t all be Obama supporters (I am one, btw) but it seems that at least a few of them would have been for McCain just looking at averages.

Sneaky-ass Fox “News”.

Posted: Oct 4, 2008 at 2:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · Fannie

You should change your name to the “reactionary right.” I haven’t ever seen a network who have been so baised in their reporting. You call network ‘fair and balanced”, please. I am sure somebody is paying your commentators to spin the same message day after day. The American people deserve to hear both sides of a story.

Posted: Oct 26, 2008 at 10:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.