"A Vermont legislator plans to introduce a bill to allow gay marriage in the state that first approved civil unions for same-sex couples. State Sen. John Campbell, a Democrat, says he will sponsor the bill in the legislative session beginning in January. He acknowledges it is unlikely to gain ground unless Gov. Jim Douglas signals support. The Republican governor said Thursday that the civil union law is sufficient but wouldn't say whether he would veto a gay-marriage bill." [AP, earlier]
So Lady Gaga Was Pretty Great at the AMAs. And Adam Lambert Was Pretty Terrible (30)
· staciegirlie says: Why didn’t this writer sign his name to his article so I can give him his... »
· bruce says: Please do not compare Adam Lambert to the Britney/Madonna kiss at the VMA’s. Adam... »
· bruce says: Janet Jackson can’t sing, I’m afraid. Her voice is dreadful. The only thing... »
Chai Feldblum Only Accidentally Supports Polygamy (4)
· Farbo says: People should be allowed to organize there families as they see fit. As long as there is... »
Adam Lambert: Out Magazine Can Eat Shit + Die (224)
· staciegirlie says: @Romeo–I know, what’s up with the lousy sound production, camera... »
“Anti-Gay” Anglican Bishop A Gay? (14)
· Jeannie Armstrong says: Bishop Urwin confirmed my little girl in her Christian faith. Active... »
Why Won’t China Let Director Lou Ye Show His New Movie? The Bisexual Storyline, Perhaps (3)
· Rainfish says: Oh, hell…officially atheist Communist regimes also condemned Homosexuality... »
The Ridiculous Catholic Manifesto Pledging to Ignore Gay Marriage + Abortion Laws (47)
· Rainfish says: GOD Loving figment of your imagination or dangerous delusion? … you decide. Now... »
· Schteve says: I love how they say “No one should be compelled to embrace any religion against... »
PHOTOS: Rebel With a Cause (1)
· YellowRanger says: Ooh, dreamy… »
Anyone saying that civil unions are sufficient probably would veto a marriage bill, particularly if those are civil unions in the far-less-legal-benefits sense of the term.
I find it so strange that Vermont has a Republican governor, given that it votes in a proud socialist senator.
Though I guess the parties in the US aren't as rigidly defined throughout the country as they are in European states.
Still, good to see movement on this in another US state. Let's hope it passes.
Totally misread the headline. I thought it was something about the Harry Potter villain. Stupid saturday morning.
@EuroDubliner: Minority government – often referred to as "divided government" – is very common in the United States. In fact, the voters here seem to love classically "bad" government. There's a rather quaint notion among many Americans that inefficiency and gridlock will result in more personal freedom. An idea that simply wouldn't fly in Europe (where a government must command the confidence of lawmakers to remain in office).
As is the case with Vermont, having a Republican governor alongside huge Democratic majorities in a state legislature isn't uncommon. The governor will still appoint ministers and other bureaucrats to run the state government. But he or she has no control over the legislative agenda. Moreover, both sides must come to a compromise when it comes time to deal with the budget.
@John in CA:
Thanks John for your comment. Yes there is a huge gulf in the way one views the government between those in Europe and America.
Here we really look to the government to change society and help us with creating a better quality of life.
Yet there seems to still be quite a number of layers of democratic apparatus at the disposal of Americans, probably more so than for Europeans. And enforcement of laws appears to me to be more successful. One example is dealing with corruption.
The use of initiatives is beautifully democratic in some ways. Though very fascist on the other hand, like Hitler's abuse of them when he ruled.
It's tragic the world over that human rights are still at the behest of bigots and nosy parkers rather than decided on a logical basis by courts or ancient Greek lots.
But we'll have to live with it. Or not, as the case may be.