Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  FRONT-PAGE NEW

FUNNY OR DIE? Website Mashes Up Time And Newsweek Covers

Humor site Hypervocal is poking fun at the two newsweeklies’ buzzworthy covers—and the desperate state of print media—with the mashup cover above.

“Imagine what would happen if we combined Time’s “Sloppy Second Base Heard ‘Round the World” and Newsweek’s “Sloppy Photoshop of Totally Gay Obama.” It might look something like this.”

 

So what do you think, Queerty patrol? Funny, infuriating or just flat?

By:           Dan Avery
On:           May 15, 2012
Tagged: , , , ,

  • 13 Comments
    • Scott
      Scott

      I just don’t find this funny. It’s sophomoric.

      May 15, 2012 at 5:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • todd
      todd

      not only not funny–at all–it’s also poorly done and just stupid.

      May 15, 2012 at 5:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jabaroo
      Jabaroo

      Agree with No. 1 and No. 2, not funny at all, it’s like they’re trying to hard to be funny, but at the same time not hard enough.

      May 15, 2012 at 5:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Oh, ok
      Oh, ok

      And we’ve come full circle. Obama publicly supports us and is met with homophobia aimed at him and us. Yet it’s just a “joke” right?

      It’s ridiculous how both gays and supposed straight allies attacked him before this much more in your face stance and immediately after continue attacking him.

      If I was him I’d really just toss my hands up in the air and think “Why bother?”.

      I thought the whole point of gay equality, “It Gets Better”, etc was to stop bullying, gay bashing, and mocking gays.

      Where’s GLAAD, HRC, etc raising hell against these images and phrases that just mock what Obama is doing FOR us?

      May 15, 2012 at 6:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Marie Cohn
      Marie Cohn

      At the rate we’re going, by November: polls reveal 48% of likely voters believe Obama is gay. Not “gay”, as in “lame”, but gay as in homosexual.

      (This was the gist of Lawrence O’Donnell’s critique of the Newsweek cover last night on MSNBC).

      May 15, 2012 at 6:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • w.e.
      w.e.

      Tina Brown and Andrew Sullivan have brought ridicule onto someone who has been trying to do positive things for the gay community for some time. It has now become a sad punchline on the late night talkshows, and for that, I will never forgive either of them. And of course, the haters at Queerty have to perpetuate the images to further doom a valiant attempt at fairness and justice, and by extension, our quest for equal rights for years to come.

      May 15, 2012 at 8:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LaTeesha
      LaTeesha

      Stupid & trashy.

      May 15, 2012 at 8:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • D-lite
      D-lite

      The edit is kind of terrible by itself, however being able to compare it to the original magazines it’s based off of I actually gotta say it’s really funny. I think I’m more bothered by the original Newsweek cover, it’s poorly made, the word choice is terrible and what are they really trying to convey with that image? It’s just a ridiculous cover.

      May 15, 2012 at 9:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Belize
      Belize

      @Oh, ok: “It’s ridiculous how both gays and supposed straight allies attacked him before this much more in your face stance and immediately after continue attacking him.”

      Personally, I find his support comforting. But if I’m going to be real with you, love, I would say that it was a VERY BAD political move that may have endangered his reelection. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that he is giving out very vocal support to the LGBT community.

      But the big problem is this, the LGBT issue is a very divisive issue. And now, I think that a great deal of people who used to support him have decided not to because of that. And that, to me, is a lose-lose scenario considering the theory that he isn’t going to win more votes with that statement anyway. The people he would’ve won with that statement has already been won after the Republican alternatives were announced.

      I mean really, Santorum, Bachmann, Romney? Had it been McCain, I would’ve understood the need to show vocal support to the LGBT. But those three? Oh no.

      May 16, 2012 at 12:54 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Aric
      Aric

      When will our gay community as a whole realize that this is a ploy for votes, and the 1-in-6 bundlers who would withhold their money from him??

      May 16, 2012 at 3:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • K!r!lleXXI
      K!r!lleXXI

      Oh, that’s right, because anyone who supports gay rights is gay themselves. I see the logic. It’s like every member of Greenpeace is a non-human animal. Uh-huh… Makes perfect sense.

      May 16, 2012 at 6:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mark
      Mark

      So why does “Hypervocal” get a pass? If that was on Michelle Malkin or Rush Limbaugh’s website Barney Frank and Debbie Wasserman Shultz would be on every am talk show screaming racism and homophobia. Maxine Walters and the C.B.C. would be ballistic. I think the simple answer is none of them have seen it.

      May 16, 2012 at 7:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Randall Reynolds
      Randall Reynolds

      Silly and juvenile.

      May 16, 2012 at 3:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    !-- Sailthru Horizon -->
    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.