Comments on: Gay Jesus Orgy Sparks Outrage (Obviously)

By: Jasper

Jasper — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:54:58 +0000

Rule #34 – there is porn of it.

By: LC

LC — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:29:15 +0000

“Mark you this…the devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness Is like a villain with a smiling cheek.”

1596 Shakespeare Merchant of Venice i. iii. 93

Hrdlickaâ€™s work may be called “art,”
but that does not make it so,
nor nearly hit the mark.

By: Samanth

Samanth — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:28:56 +0000

I think the painting is sick, hideous and the thought to even portray Jesus Christ as gay is so ludicrous….I don’t hate gay people, but I hate their actions….and I am deeply insulted as a Christian…not Roman Catholic either….SDA Christian.. for this painting to have been created. But God is watching, and the just shall be separated from the wicked. I will pray for you all.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:03:53 +0000

That’s just Brilliant!

By: Tom Heneghan

Tom Heneghan — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:55:46 +0000

Cardinal SchÃ¶nborn has given a statement explaining his stand on the Hrdlicka Last Supper painting. The text is on the Reuters religion blog FaithWorld at http://blogs.reuters.com/faith.....-painting/

By: Bob R

Bob R — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:50:22 +0000

You mean the Last Supper wasn’t a gay orgy? Didn’t they eat of his flesh and drink his blood? Wasn’t Jesus a gay man? I’ve heard that rumor. Oh, one man’s myth is another man’s lunacy I suppose.

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:50:29 +0000

The picture is fierce.

“The artist’s role is to disturb.”
- Barbra Streisand

By: Maverick69

Maverick69 — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:34:21 +0000

I’m not hungry, I’ll just pick.

By: Amber LeMay

Amber LeMay — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:09:06 +0000

Thanks for the link… I’ll have what he’s having.

By: Zarz

Zarz — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:32:01 +0000

http://voxhumanae.files.wordpr......jpg?w=420

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:30:21 +0000

Any Catholic who objects to homo-erotic art has clearly never been to the Vatican Museums. The place is loaded with the stuff.

By: CitizenGeek

CitizenGeek — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:24:14 +0000

Can someone at least link to the picture?

By: hells kitchen guy

hells kitchen guy — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:43:56 +0000

How can you have a blog item entirely about a picture and then not show the picture?!?!?!

By: Dubwise

Dubwise — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:45:45 +0000

I’m not gonna say anything about the picture unless i can see it!

By: emb

emb — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:41:08 +0000

Well what exactly do people expect the response to be to “art” that purposefully provokes and offends? I’m not saying it should be censored or that indignation or riots are an appropriate response, but really: it’s like putting a pro-Phelps float at a pride parade–the response is predictable with a significant degree of accuracy, and the resulting “debate” is of minimal constructive value.

By: kevin57

kevin57 — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:38:19 +0000

I can’t say I’m thrilled by this sort of “art.” It’s an unnecessary provocation and the Right will use it to demonstrate that we are lunatics, blasphemers, etc.