Each year since 2007, GLAAD has filed a Network Responsibility Index, a report card of sorts, examining how major television channels are doing with the quantity and quality of images of LGBT people.
Granted, it’s not an exact science—what’s considered a “positive” representation is open to interpretation. Take Lafayette and Jesus on True Blood. Some might say a short-order cook/drug dealer and his witch boyfriend don’t make good role models. But considering their friends are fairies, vampires, shapeshifters and (possibly) werepanthers, its a sliding scale.
And admittedly, GLAAD’s sampling seems random: Boutique channels like A&E and ABC Family get vetted, but major networks like Bravo, MTV and Comedy Central aren’t. And maybe GLAAD could show some balls and give Logo a thorough examination for how its representing the rainbow. (Granted, in a different study.)
Still, the report is interesting reading—especially if you haven’t kept up on what’s airing on the boob tube these days. The full study, made available today, can be found here.
Some findings include:
The Good News
Lots of shows with major queer storylines, characters and themes are critical and commercial success. And a number are Emmy nominees or winners—like Modern Family, True Blood and Glee.The Bad News
Trans people got the short end of the stick, representing only 1% of all LGBT people, real or fictional, represented on television.Do you have something to say about LGBT representations on television? Tell us in the comments. And there will be a test!
I would like to see more black gay people on tv.
·
Ryan made me wish I was a ghost before I knew he went bi. Now I want to meet him more than ever.
·
Applaud, condemn. Applaud, condemn.
GLAAD is nauseating.
·
How could they leave out Home and garden TV… The entire channel/network is GAY. They have REAL Gay people as both Hosts and subjects of the show. The shows show us as we really are… They show that we do not spend our entire life at bars, the beach gay pride parades etc… They show that we are not always Drama Queens… They show that we are just like them.
I do not know of one show on H&G TV (aka: Homo&Gay TV) That does not show us in the best sense of all. They have couples, both Gay and Lesbian, looking for homes and not as roommates
On the remodel shows they show and talk about Master suites with one say he wanted this, and the other saying he wanted that.
Hell even a commercial that they ran 5 years ago was gay… A straight couple sitting on the sofa watching TV had the husband saying in shock… “you mean that they are not brothers”… and the wife just smiled… I laughed at that each time I saw it.
AND the HOSTS… Does it get much Gayer then all those Hot guys… And perhaps The ladies know who the Lesbian Hosts are.
I LOVE H&G TV!!
·
I agree with JAW the Scripps Networks (HGTV, DIY Network, Food Network, Cooking Channel, Travel Channel, GAC) should get some love from GLAAD.
They’re always gay friendly and positive. And this from networks headquartered in Knoxville, TN.
·
LOGA would fail miserably – all it does is promote bad sterotypes.
·
I wish GLAAD would take some time looking at how LGBT media does it’s own self-inflicting damage of LGBT folk bu investigating the increase in LGBT media glorifying condomless sex.
Check out this letter:
Will GLAAD address condomless sex LGBT media glorification?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qDaT4VvNiA-lwEMYdwDCt6U52wzufBcs4eTDBtQ5iL4/edit?hl=en_US
·
@jeff4justice:
.
I do not see the connection… perhaps post it in the thread about the increase in HIV+ men… esp men of color. The younger generation is not getting the message, even though the message is out there in their face.
GLAAD is working with the mainstream media… media that is available to the general population.
·
CBS has a gay character on “The Good Wife”< so if a study is going to have credence, it needs to be acccurate
·
“Trans people got the short end of the stick, representing only 1% of all LGBT people, real or fictional, represented on television.”
What’s the percentage in real life?
I kinda think it wouldn’t be very much. Perhaps 1% is about right..?