
Republican leaders aren't amused by lewd Larry Craig's antics.
The Idahoan Senator announced yesterday that he'll stay in office despite a judge's decision to stick him with disorderly conduct charges. Those charges, of course, stem from Craig's toilet trolling last July, during which the three-term senator attempted to get off with an undercover cop. Rather than charging him with lewd conduct, coppers took pity on crude Craig and offered him disorderly conduct, to which Craig pleaded guilty. After the scandal broke, Craig vowed to resign if a judge dismissed his reversal plea. He did not.
Now, some GOP honchos are looking for a way to give him the book, including a potentially embarrassing public ethics investigation. Republican Senator John Ensign of Nevada hopes it won't come to that:
I think it would be a mistake to put the Senate through an ethics investigation process that could potentially lead to public hearings. I think that he should do the right thing and keep his word.
Ensign also said Craig's resignation would be "the right thing to do for his party." Unfortunately for the Republicans, however, Craig doesn't seem to have much interest in his party's survival.
Long-time supporter Senator Arlen Specter, meanwhile, seems to be one of the few Republicans who suport Craig's decision:
Senator Craig is entitled to make his decision and I respect it. Disorderly conduct is not moral turpitude, and it is no basis for leaving the Senate.
That may be true, but there's no doubt in our mind Craig brought shame upon the party: not for his bathroom cruising, but for his outrageous, arrogant tenacity.
Conservative lobbyist Bryan Fischer remarks:
He's rapidly becoming a liability for his party and the state of Idaho, and for his party at the national level. The longer he remains in office, the more fodder he gives to the Democrats to make his scandal a 2008 election issue.
With all the GOP chatter, the Democrats may not even need to say a word.
It’s Official: Washington Says YES to Referendum 71 (4)
· Robert Christian says: As happy as I am that Referendum 71 passed,-it is odd that Protect Marriage... »
Were These Dads Harassed + Detained By Wal-Mart Because They’re Gay? (12)
· adolf says: you should never shop at walmart. their treatment of their employs, and lack of benefits... »
· AlwaysGay says: HETEROSEXUAL DICTATORSHIP. No you are not reading about the Soviet Union, you are... »
· constructionworker says: “Banned for life”? And that’s supposed to be a... »
Maggie Gallagher’s Maine Condolence Letter Will Surely Cause You to Tear Up (38)
· Doug says: At one point the outcome will come out differently and the tide will come for equality. »
Even Pastor Joel Osteen Can’t Explain Why God Might Have F’d Up By Making Gays (35)
· Just a thought... says: I really don’t feel like getting into a combative text debate with you. No... »
Can’t A Television Show Say ‘Fag’ Anymore Without GLAAD Getting Upset? (58)
· Stop Bitching says: South Park isn’t trying to hurt anyone by making this show… Stone... »
Will Iran Cancel the Death Sentences of 3 ‘Homosexual Conduct’ Criminals? (5)
· mallory says: unfortunately, they’re as good as dead. There is no justice in this world. »
Is It Wrong to Refuse to Have Sex With HIV-Positive Men? (82)
· nicholas says: No. 80 · Po Mo, THANKS a lot! to expect a stranger you just met to be more... »
Is Wanda Sykes’s New Show Already Damaging Wendy Williams? (17)
· jerseygirl says: Sorry sweetmommy but Wendy has been saying “how you doin?” loooooong... »
There are no comments yet. Post yours!