• Greg Scarnici and company are up to their old parodic tricks with this send up of poor Britney Spears‘ VMA performance.
• Yes, the Melrose gang aged well, but we refuse to believe Laura Leighton got botox.
• Mark Simpson on the sexy Mormon calendar: “If these topless apostles appeared on my doorstep I’d believe in a benevolent deity. Crikey, I’d even give up tea.” That’s a lot coming from a Brit. Must be love.
• Iranian officer arrested smuggling bombs in Iraq.
• More on anti-gay music in the Caribbean.
• Gay teen drama: a television event.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
• Chickenhawks love Hillary Clinton. And her October 10, 2001 statements:
In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.
…
[I]f left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.
Someone call the spin doctor.
EdWoody
The anti-gay Caribbean story was written back in March. Which I suppose doesn’t really matter all that much, since it’s probably still true. But it does explain why it thinks Blair is still Brit PM.
Bill Perdue
…intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program…He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.”
She lied as much as Cheney, Bush and other policy makers of the Republican and Democratic Party. She still at it.
But just for clarity here, we’re talking about the bad kind of chickenhawks, right? Scum like Romney whose sons ‘serve the nation’ by helping get him elected. Or the Democrat and Republican congressmembers whose sons will never don combat gear or become casualities?