Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
Back to the post

Hate Group Swipes NYC Couple’s Photo For Anti-Gay Ad In CO

ugh


Back to the post
By:           Dan Avery
On:           Jun 29, 2012
Tagged: , , , , ,
  • 25 Comments
    • Matt
      Matt

      Copyrights are consistently upheld by the courts so this group has a huge lawsuit coming its way. I hope this couple bankrupt the bastards.

      Jun 29, 2012 at 4:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1equalityUSA
      1equalityUSA

      I hope this couple can buy a huge, beautiful, full-floor flat in their favorite part of NYC with the money they make from suing these F__ktards into the red. Go get ‘em, boys!

      Jun 29, 2012 at 4:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mitchell S. Gilbert
      Mitchell S. Gilbert

      It’s Not the People In this Photo Who Have a Problem http://wp.me/p1Jt6N-Jz

      Jun 29, 2012 at 4:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hephaestion
      Hephaestion

      Check out their wacko web site at http://www.publicadvocateusa.org/ and you’ll see that they gave Marcus Bachmann an award!!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

      Jun 29, 2012 at 6:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Geoff B
      Geoff B

      Marcus Bachmann got an award for something other than power-bottoming? I swear, you learn something new every day.

      Jun 29, 2012 at 7:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Aaron A.
      Aaron A.

      There is no “they” in Public Advocate. Public Advocate is run in its entirety by Eugene Delgaudio, a member of the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, VA. It truly appears that Public Advocate is nothing more than a cash cow for Delgaudio – he rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year from little old ladies and right-wing wack jobs whom he terrifies with weekly emails about the “rabid homosexuals” who regularly “threaten [his] life and family.” This is completely typical behavior for him.

      Jun 29, 2012 at 9:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • G
      G

      I can’t wait to hear the follow-up story where the couple gets so much money out of their dumb asses.

      Jun 29, 2012 at 9:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • joh
      joh

      Someone should add this bit of thievery to his wikipedia page.
      He appears to be another of those polititian/grifters.

      Jun 29, 2012 at 10:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • shannon
      shannon

      AWWWWWWWWWW……………THEY WERE JEALOUS CAUSE THESE TWO TOOK SUCH A BEAUTIFUL PICTURE TOGETHER! THEY HAD TO FIND A REASON TO STEAL IT…….LOLOL

      Jun 30, 2012 at 12:05 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      Queerty’s article stated, ‘Eugene Delgaudio, told the Post, “Other groups make fair use of our materials or [and the] 2,000 photos from our website under these broad principles of political education.”’

      It will be amusing to see what happens if they try to run that argument past a judge! If he thinks the “everyone does it” defense will work, try that with a speeding ticket.

      BTW, there was an incident in San Francisco several years ago where some porn-shop owner put an ad outside his store using a photoshopped image of a scantily clad guy lifted off of a European-based dating site, with photoshop used to add some dildos. Unfortunately for the store owner, the guy whose picture he used lived in San Francisco and saw it. He was a therapist or something and sued or threatened to sue due to the damage this picture would obviously do to his reputation – people would assume he was modeling for the porn shop. The porn shop owner whined about it, but he had no leg to stand on as he clearly violated copyright laws.

      I hope these two do the same thing – sue for damages. They are not even public figures.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 12:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1equalityUSA
    • 1equalityUSA
      1equalityUSA

      NOM’s Robert P George is at it again, hiring a scholar, a term used with derision, named Regnerus to slap together a bogus study in time for the 2012 election that says gays are unfit for parenthood. The same underhanded methods were used to gather fraudulent data similar to attempts to drive a wedges between blacks and gays, then Jews and gays. University of Texas, Austin has rules against Academic fraud. Sign the petition to have University officials call for an investigation. Robert P. George is using researchers to bolster his homophobic agenda and will resort to giving grants amounting to $785,000.00 in order to get his ill-gotten data in time for the 2012 election. Romney signed the NOM pledge. These two are so gross.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 1:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • brian
      brian

      as an alumnus of the university of texas system, o hells yeah there are very stringent rules about data that they take Very seriously. not to say $785k cant make them look hard at the twisting you can do in the statistics but it is peer reviewed and they know it and they take their accreditation very seriously which in part is impacted by their following of statistical ethics.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 2:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B
      B

      Re No 11: I’m not impressed. BTW, when I tried to cross check this guy’s claim that Robert P. George personally(?) arranged for the funding, I ran across this article:

      http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/2012/06/16/why-mark-regnerus-study-shouldnt-matter-even-if-it-were-the-most-scientifically-robust-study-in-the-world/

      It had a critique of the paper Regnerus wrote, but the only “link” to George was in a comment by the same LBGT “activist” and maybe a few others, who seems to be posting his theory about funding in comment sections or in their own articles.

      I could not find a credible source showing that George in fact arranged funding personally. If you have one, provide a link to it. George doesn’t seem to be directly associated with NOM at present – he’s listed as having an emeritus position (i.e., he “retired” but they want to keep mentioning his name).

      Jun 30, 2012 at 2:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Belize
      Belize

      I’m not surprised that The Public Advocate of the United States is acting this way. If you don’t even have enough money to hire your own models and photographers, I’m not surprised if you don’t have enough money for good education. :)

      Jun 30, 2012 at 3:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Tavdy79
      Tavdy79

      If I were in their position I wouldn’t demand financial compensation, I would demand a public apology – the more public the better. Ideally, a series of prime-time-slot adverts on Colorado radio & TV.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 5:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris-MI
      Chris-MI

      It’s clearly not fair use. Eugene Delgaudio needs to talk to a lawyer before he gets his head so far up there that it gets stuck. And citing the education exception for an attack ad slides past lame through infuriating and lands squarely in hilarious.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 6:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • James
      James

      Screw a public apology. That will teach him nothing. I can just hear it now: “Though I am sorry for utilizing a photograph without authorization I still contend these heathens are human scum.” Yeah, that’s really helpful.

      Suing would be a giant pain in the ass, unfortunately, because the guy will surely have millionaire anti-gay tea party jerks giving him top notch lawyers; and the gay couple will have similar support from gay anti-defamation groups. It will last forever, be appealed, blah blah blah…

      All that being said, there isn’t a judge in the WORLD who wouldn’t side with the couple in the photo. Ownership of the photo aside, by using it in advertising you inherently suggest that they have some sort of association with the organization in question (even if the photo is using them to demonstrate what the organization is against.) To say that indicating a married gay couple are associated with an odious anti-gay group is defamatory is an understatement.

      Jun 30, 2012 at 9:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • the other Greg
      the other Greg

      @James: I guess the only legal way around that problem would be for them to get two homophobic men, who believed in the group’s homophobic aims and message, to kiss for the camera!

      Come to think of it, judging from Republican politicians, that shouldn’t be too difficult.

      Jul 1, 2012 at 1:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • 1equalityUSA
      1equalityUSA

      many do come to think of it

      Jul 1, 2012 at 4:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Baba Booey
      Baba Booey

      Hopefully The Public Advocate is sued and bankrupt.

      Jul 2, 2012 at 7:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ted TampaBay
      Ted TampaBay

      Gosh, I thought it was a depiction of Yesua being kissed by one of his disciples.

      Jul 6, 2012 at 3:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ted TampaBay
      Ted TampaBay

      Gosh, I thought it was a depiction of Yehsua being kissed by one of his disciples.

      Jul 6, 2012 at 3:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JON
      JON

      Well…they can just suck my dick! Ha Ha Ha

      Jul 6, 2012 at 4:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dr cooper
      Dr cooper

      I think we should give Loudoun County Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio a call to his office and let him know this is not ok: 703-777-0204
      Also send an email: eugene.delgaudio@loudoun.gov

      Jul 13, 2012 at 4:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • MORE PHOTOS

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.