another complaint under way from me.
here’s the link so you don’t have to read any more poison.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem.....ately.html

If *nobody* paid attention to her shit, she WOULDN’T have an audience.

Instead, the hysterical drama queens have catapulted her into a position of prominence in the right wing that she’ll enjoy for years… a steady gravy train.

Good going guys.

What makes you think a straight people are better at being monogamous than gay people? Hello, Peaches, the (straight) divorce rate is 60%. For the straight couples that don’t get divorced, 60% of those are cheating. (Sounds to me straight marriage is a bigger failure than gay domestic partnerships.) From what I can tell straight people I know personally, they screw around as much if not more than gay people. Also, since when is it that only gay people have open relationships? Only gay people have threesomes? I know plenty of couples in open relationships….and guess what? They’re all middle-aged, straight couples! I also know plenty of straight couples who’ve had threesomes, too.

And why bother with monogamy anyway? Monogamy was invented during an era when women were property. Women were chattel and the property of their fathers who sold them and their hymens to their husbands. Is that something we gay folks actually want to emulate? How about everyone’s body is their own property and is not “owned” by another person? How about that?

Fuck you….with a rusty hacksaw.

Love & Kisses,

Phoenix Is Phabulous

p.s. Good luck on your future job hunt….NOT!!!

After all, we’re striving to be equal, not special.

In Britain, the government has more controls over the press than here.

Then she uses the hurt and anger of the gay community to inflict further hurt, by calling gay people “hysterical” and stating that her column was only wrong because a family member may have read it. The purpose of her second article is not apology, but to accuse the gay community of opportunism. But she is the black cat who pounced on death as a way to advance her evil conservative christian agenda.

Signed,
Jan Moir”

While here wording was poor, her timing inappropriate, and the validity of her opinion on the matter infinitesimal, she did issue a heart-felt apology.

Her statement re: young men do not just drop dead was invalid given her lacking medical expertise and training. Evidence suggests…. they do.

To state anything otherwise about the dead does a disservice to the deceased life and the validity of the mourning of those left behind.

I would much rather see this not address to us, but to his partner and his family.

There’s no ‘if’ about it. 22,000 people complained, Jan. You DID cause offence. Now apologise properly.

Her speculation about a threesome wasn’t the problem; the problem was her wholesale indictment of SSMs: “Another real sadness about Gately’s death is that it strikes another blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships.”

She completely ignores this in her “apology,” instead blaming “a hysterical overreaction” (any of you men catch that slap at _your_ masculinity?), “…much of it … an orchestrated campaign by pressure groups and those with agendas of their own.”

Oh, really, Jan? Name names. ‘Cause I sure didn’t get my marching orders from The Big Giant Gay Head.

But then, Miss Moir appears to be downright psychic, as she claims “many who complained” hadn’t even read her original column. (And you know this… how, Jan? I read every word.)

Finally, she plays victim — of a “torrent of abuse.” Oh, somebody call the wahhhhmbulance!

And then, of course, there’s the “sorry IF I have caused distress…” (classic non-apology; translated: “Gee, too bad _you’re_ so hypersensitive”), and in the same sentence attributes the negative reaction to “the insensitive timing of the column, published so close to the funeral.”

It wasn’t the timing, Jan. And I think you know that.

Overall: Big, epic FAIL.

“…he could barely carry a tune in a Louis Vuitton trunk… He was the Posh Spice of Boyzone, a popular but largely decorous addition.”

But now he’s a…

“talented young man”.

“Another real sadness about Gately’s death is that it strikes another blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships.

Gay activists are always calling for tolerance and understanding about same-sex relationships, arguing that they are just the same as heterosexual marriages. Not everyone, they say, is like George Michael.

Of course, in many cases this may be true. Yet the recent death of Kevin McGee, the former husband of Little Britain star Matt Lucas, and now the dubious events of Gately’s last night raise troubling questions about what happened.”

I find it difficult to believe that she would have used two examples of straight couples’ marriages ending in sad circumstances as an excuse to call hetero marriage a “myth” or to suggest that all marriages should be reconsidered.

Moir is a lying word-whore whose paper should be boycotted and protested until she is fired.

I guess that means I really don’t accept her non-apology.