Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
perry's Jeff Zarrillo

“He’s the love of my life. I love him probably more than I love myself”

SOUNDBITES — “He’s the love of my life. I love him probably more than I love myself.” —Perry plaintiff Jeff Zarrillo (on right), speaking about his partner Paul Katami (left) during questioning by attorney David Boies today (via)

  • 7 Comments
    • dontblamemeivotedforhillary
      dontblamemeivotedforhillary

      Seeing our love televised might be the galvanizing effect America needs.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 4:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • $0.02
      $0.02

      This is beautiful. This is what America needs to see. A REAL gay couple who are in love and committed to one another. Yes, we monogamous gays do exist and there is nothing unnatural about our love. Kudos to this handsome couple.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mac mcneill
      mac mcneill

      Considering who the attorneys for the gays are, I think we might actually have a chance, more so than any other time in history. And this will go to the Supreme court, but the question will be, will the Judges follow the constitution or will they follow their religion in making the decision. Most of the judges are catholics and we know where the catholics stands on gays. Still haven’t figured out where they stand on Pedophiles since the hide them in their churches.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 4:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • HiredGoons
      HiredGoons

      Oh god that’s adorable.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 5:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ian
      Ian

      RE: No. 3 MAC MCNEILL: Well we already know Scalia doesn’t hide his hateful thoughts towards Gay Americans, he almost always uses the flimsiest of legal reasoning to masquarade as ‘justice’ to hide his blatent justification of nothing other than bigoted hate. Hopefully the other conservative justices won’t allow their religious beliefs completely cloud what is supposed to be judgement under our nations laws and Constitution & not Leviticus.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 11:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      No. 5 · Ian
      RE: No. 3 MAC MCNEILL: Well we already know Scalia doesn’t hide his hateful thoughts towards Gay Americans, he almost always uses the flimsiest of legal reasoning to masquarade as ‘justice’ to hide his blatent justification of nothing other than bigoted hate.
      ________________________

      On the bright side, one of Scalia’s arguments against the Lawrence v. Texas verdic was “If we allow this then there is no valid reason not to have gay marriage” Be interesting to see if Scalia’s words come back to haunt him.

      Jan 12, 2010 at 11:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      That was very charming bu LOVE should not be the only reason gay people have the right to marry. It is not the only reason straight people marry. I think we must be careful of the terminology that is used. It may backfire.

      Feb 28, 2010 at 12:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.