Of course if the situation was reversed and traditional marriage supporters were trying to close down businesses run by homosexuals, trying to get homosexuals kicked out of their jobs, attacking homosexuals in the street etc, then you would be wailing like school girls and demanding even more ‘anti-discrimination’ laws!

Quoted for truth.

That’s right!

Yet too few LGBT people use it, and too many wait for Big Daddy Obama to take care of us.

The power of capitalism is perhaps the most effective tool to achieve social reform.

Since Manchester is so happy using his money to take away other people’s rights, his capital resources should vanish in correspondence. The age of special interests’ hold over our government and society is over. Manchester obviously didn’t get the memo.

After this is said and done, what prevents Manchester from blocking LGBT reform at the federal level, or funding another state campaign against LGBT rights? The Hyatt should also be held absolutely accountable as a funding channel for Manchester’s discriminatory tactics.

May the Hyatt Boycott Spread Nationally Until It Terminates It’s Relationship with Manchester.

Bravo Manchester Boycott, KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!

This guy is most likely a millionaire who picks and chooses his clients based on their ability to pay.

Bragman and his husband have enough money to shield them from any kind of real discrimination. (Funny how money does that).

As far as Bragman being part of “our community”. Walk up to him the next time you see him and watch how fast he calls for security to get you out of his community.

Is he in it just for the money and notoriety? Perhaps. But let’s just all remember the thing about boycotts: they aren’t meant to last forever. They’re meant to achieve a political aim. Bragman’s political aim may be the same as those who are now calling him a “Judas”.

Like I said, I know nothing about him, but generosity requires giving someone the benefit of the doubt before judging them.

And that publicist took a job. At a time when jobs are rare. I would like to think that he would have said no, out of solidarity. But right now, work is work.

Doug Manchester played a big role in putting Bragman’s marriage in jeopardy, and all he seems to care about are Manchester’s dollars. That’s shameful.

If Hitler supported domestic partnerships, they’d give him a favorable rating.

All of us at one point or another have worked jobs that conflicted with our personal ethics. How many of us knowingly sold homes to people who couldn’t afford them, or work for health insurance companies who purposely deny benefits to the sick so that the company becomes more profitable?

How many of us work for companies that evict the poor and the disabled from their homes? And how many of us work for corporations that pollute the planet?

Ignore Bragman. It’s really Manchester who is at fault here. He made a terrible decision to fund a hateful piece of legislation and we should continue to remind him of it. Good for those groups, like HRC (who I’m usually not a fan of), for not crossing the picket line.