An eagle-eyed reader spots at least four gay men on The Hill‘s list of D.C.’s 50 Most Beautiful, where the running joke is, “They found fifty?” There’s Ryan Fitzpatrick (who is “single and acknowledges that he doesn’t do too much to stay beautiful,” although “a gym buddy keeps him motivated to exercise”), Jonathan Aronchik (who works for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and “plays tennis, runs and works out at the gym five times a week”), Adam Comis (the House Homeland Security Committee’s press secretary and self-professed “gym rat’), Amit Bagga (who’s had “has had two fashion disasters” since moving to D.C. in February), and Jake Kuhns (senior legislative aide for Democratic Rep. Tim Holden, and he’s taken). Oh, and the super adorable (and single) Hudson Hollister, an attorney for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, made sexier by his porn star name and the “Republican” notation next it. Call us, Hud! Now crowd source this thing and help us find some of D.C.’s power broking lesbians.
eye candy
How Many Gays Made The Hill‘s 50 Most Beautiful?
Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated
Lucas
That scarf (?) around Amit’s neck looks like another fashion disaster. BTW, the queeriest quote go to the queeriest looking… no shock.
And Hudson reminds me of Matt LeBlanc.
...
Lucas is drinking some haterade this AM.
Lucas
@…: It’s been a rough morning.
James Davis
The only 1 I find fairly attractive of these 6 is Hudson, and that’s primarily because of his lovely DSL.
But hey that’s my opinion, others could easily have a differing point of view.
Jahlalalala Who Cares
I don’t get it: are all these men gay? But there’s six of them and the text says four? Confused. 6 not sures, 4 gays, or 6 gays? Please clarify.
Larry Craig
That Adam Comis is an absolute DREAMBOAT!!!
L.
@Jahlalalala Who Cares: Perhaps someone at Queerty thinks gay are worth only two-thirds of a person? (That’d be a step up from what slaves were thought to be worth, still.)
Enron
I wanna see Adam Comis shirtless, I bet there is a hot collection of ripped abs, pecs hidden.
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
I saw this list on Huffpost earlier and these guys all gots the Gaydar pinging……….
Howeva I am not too familiar with the “new math” that Queerts seems to be formulating here where they spot four and then put pics of six with blurbs about each of them……….
Do ya get two “bonus” straight guys if you take the four pack of the Gay dudes???? :-p
Cam
@Lucas:
It’s weird also that they don’t say what his job is, like they did foreverybody else. I can’t imagine an office on the hill that somebody would be allowed to wear that scarf without serious mocking…unless Paul Lynde rose from the grave and ran for office.
Dandy
Amit is by far the most beautiful.
Black Pegasus
None of those Mens Express Queens look pretty to me.
Kyle412
Did the defintion of “beautiful” change? Living in DC I know it is known as Hollywood for Ugly People and they probably had to look high and low to find these guys, BUT I’m sure they are beautiful on the inside. These guys don’t fit my definition of physically “beautiful”.
jonah
I’d say he’s hot
Do a search for a 28 year old in DC on BigMuscle.com and you’ll know what I’m talking about
Lucky Luke
Adam looks good on BigMuscle, I expected him to be older than 28.
Leonard Jacobs
But wait — does it say in the story they’re gay? Shouldn’t it? Couldn’t it? I mean, for all the straight ones, it’s not as if their relationships (this one’s “girlfriend,” that one’s “boyfriend,” this one is “engaged,” that one is “married”) are exactly being hidden. Why is it that we have to intuit who the beautiful gay people are?
mconyc08
@Cam: He works for Anthony Weiner. Go figure.
mconyc08
I kind of have a problem with this.
None of them are flat out saying in their write ups that they’re gay. True, one or two of these guys hints that they’re gay (Bagga and Hollister), but hinted is all they did. Hence, assuming that either one them (or the others) are gay is really bad journalism and something I would expect to see more in a supermarket tabloid. That your gaydar went “off” when you saw these guys just isn’t enough. But, then again, nobody said Queerty was committed or practiced responsible and GOOD JOURNALISM.
If Comis really is a member of BigMuscle.com, well then maybe that proves that he’s gay (a piece of information surprisingly and responsibly provided by commenters and not the author of this post). But what about Aronchick, Fitzpatrick, or worse, Kuhns?! It’s interesting how Queerty’s blurb fails to mention anything about Kuhns and just smacks his picture along with the others. Classy, Queerty.
Where did Aronchick admit that he was gay? Oh, that’s right, he said he likes going to museums! And Fitzpatrick? Maybe it was that “gym buddy” thing cause that’s what the kids are calling it these days. Right?
Come on Queerty. Whether this was your work or just an aggregated opinion from “an eagle-eyed reader,” I find it repulsive how you’re not practicing what you preach. For a site that has many times advocated against stereotyping this truly is highly hypocritical.
Remember that old saying: Don’t assume anything because you risk making an ASS out of U and ME.