
South Africa has the world's most progressive constitution. We're talking anti-discrimination, gay marriage – the works. Yet, for some reason, a judge in the Rainbow Nation has decided that being portrayed as gay somehow counts as defamation.
You'll recall that a school deputy principal brought three students to court after the juvenile jokesters fabricated photos of him and another educator in provocatively bent positions.
The principal, Louis Dey, described the situation as "humiliating" and cried to the judge that he was "belittled." And the judge agreed!
A former Waterkloof High School deputy principal has been awarded R45,000 for defamation after three pupils in 2006 distributed a doctored picture of him masturbating with the principal.The Pretoria High Court ordered Hennie le Roux, 18, Christiaan Gildenhuys, 19, and Reinhard Janse van Rensburg, 19, to pay Dr Louis Dey the damages because they had humiliated and insulted him.
The picture, which showed two naked men masturbating on a couch next to one another, was doctored to include the faces of Dey and Principle Dr Christoff Becker and was widely distributed among school pupils.
Judge Ben du Plessis said that while the image was obviously fake and amateurish, it suggested that the Dey had low moral values and would make a viewer wonder about his sexual orientation.
This shit makes us sick. Obviously these kids were in the wrong – you shouldn't be doctoring photos to show someone doing something they didn't do – but the fact that the judge took Dey's side only perpetuates ideas that being gay is something to be ashamed of – not the type of lesson a judge should be spreading.
GLAAD Only Gets Angry When Gay People Say ‘Fag.’ Straight Women Get Awards (40)
· djm says: I’ve referred to myself as a fag. My ex-bf gets offended and wonders why I say that... »
Gov. Paterson Wants NY’s Lawmakers to Choose a ‘For’ or ‘Against Discrimination’ Column (7)
· Schteve says: @NoDoubleStandards Except the Democrat that won there is against marriage equality.... »
Were These Dads Harassed + Detained By Wal-Mart Because They’re Gay? (27)
· mb00 says: I have to admit that I shopped at wal-mart in Honolulu last night out of necessity. Just... »
So This AIDS Vaccine Actually … Works? (17)
· djm says: I’m not so sure about this. Yes, I’d definitely get this vaccine if it became... »
PHOTOS: Coaster Through Life (28)
· Nobodyatall says: God, that was way too easy: http://www.facebook.com/p aulyyyy His myspace... »
Is It Wrong to Refuse to Have Sex With HIV-Positive Men? (99)
· djm says: I don’t think it’s wrong to refuse, no, but I don’t personally have a... »
· johnny says: this guy is nuts. i gamble for a living. mostly card counting and poker with some... »
Adam Lambert Suckled a Breast Just Before Breaking Up With Drake LaBry. Coincidence? (57)
· Nicole says: You’re pretty niaeve then if you think the world revolves around you. And how... »
Can’t A Television Show Say ‘Fag’ Anymore Without GLAAD Getting Upset? (84)
· WTF says: No 73: Per your argument, whenever anyone says “lame” they’re clearly... »
· WTF says: WTF – gay men were the heroes in this episode. When the fags on Harleys were... »
Looks like the Euronannystate is alive and well in the old colonies. Stupid.
With all due respect, I disagree. I think it could be argued that reasonable people may balk at being portrayed as a sexuality they aren't.
Defamation is a tort because its untrue, and it tends to object people to scorn or humiliation.
No matter how you slice it, this was untrue, and it was humiliating to the victim. It's not a shame that he sued, its a shame that people hold their prejudiced views. I think this editorial got the cart before the horse, in a sense.