<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Circumcision Halves Risk of Spreading HIV, Should All Baby Boys Get Cut?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:10:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthteller</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-269916</link>
		<dc:creator>truthteller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-269916</guid>
		<description>People who have been circumcised should not be made to feel bad, but this practice must stop. It is mutilation, in MHO. At least they stopped the cr*ap argument that it is more hygienic. 

It&#039;s been said before; education and condoms.

Cutting and discarding a vital part of a boy body to half the slight possibility of a disease that can be prevented 99.9% with cheap and sometimes free condoms is irrational, inhumane and no doctor who took the hypocrites oath should perform.
Next time do a little research, instead of publishing falsehoods that impart real people.

http://www.cirp.org/library/hygiene/

&quot;The foreskin is actually designed by nature to provide protection against disease and injury.17 By understanding these protections, we allow the foreskin to function in its role of protecting the human body from infection and disease. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who have been circumcised should not be made to feel bad, but this practice must stop. It is mutilation, in MHO. At least they stopped the cr*ap argument that it is more hygienic. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been said before; education and condoms.</p>
<p>Cutting and discarding a vital part of a boy body to half the slight possibility of a disease that can be prevented 99.9% with cheap and sometimes free condoms is irrational, inhumane and no doctor who took the hypocrites oath should perform.<br />
Next time do a little research, instead of publishing falsehoods that impart real people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cirp.org/library/hygiene/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cirp.org/library/hygiene/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The foreskin is actually designed by nature to provide protection against disease and injury.17 By understanding these protections, we allow the foreskin to function in its role of protecting the human body from infection and disease. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-269470</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-269470</guid>
		<description>What the f*ck is with all this &quot;mutilation&quot; talk? By this definition, getting piercings is mutilation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the f*ck is with all this &#8220;mutilation&#8221; talk? By this definition, getting piercings is mutilation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-269468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-269468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m circumcised and glad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m circumcised and glad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-237931</link>
		<dc:creator>Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-237931</guid>
		<description>Who the hell did this study? I am sure they manipulated the stats to prove their point. This stupid theory that genital mutilation decreases the transmission of disease will be proved incorrect. Then what? What do you tell all the males who were mutilated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell did this study? I am sure they manipulated the stats to prove their point. This stupid theory that genital mutilation decreases the transmission of disease will be proved incorrect. Then what? What do you tell all the males who were mutilated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metaphor</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-210286</link>
		<dc:creator>Metaphor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-210286</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s astonishing that the author of this article can advocate such breathtaking immorality with such ease. He then further compounds this cavalier brutality by suggesting that people who prefer unmutilated genitals are fetishists, which is such a violent inversion of common sense I can almost believe the whole thing is very bad satire.

I suggest if the author is so fond of penises without foreskins, he can cut the foreskin off his own penis. If that decision was made for him whilst he was a defenseless baby, I sympathise with his loss but I will not sympathise with his advocacy of continuing the butchery.

Routine genital mutilation of infants is a Bronze Age anachronism practised by people who talk to an imaginary friend in the sky. It has no place in what is supposed to be a civilised society.

For shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s astonishing that the author of this article can advocate such breathtaking immorality with such ease. He then further compounds this cavalier brutality by suggesting that people who prefer unmutilated genitals are fetishists, which is such a violent inversion of common sense I can almost believe the whole thing is very bad satire.</p>
<p>I suggest if the author is so fond of penises without foreskins, he can cut the foreskin off his own penis. If that decision was made for him whilst he was a defenseless baby, I sympathise with his loss but I will not sympathise with his advocacy of continuing the butchery.</p>
<p>Routine genital mutilation of infants is a Bronze Age anachronism practised by people who talk to an imaginary friend in the sky. It has no place in what is supposed to be a civilised society.</p>
<p>For shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209890</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209890</guid>
		<description>Once again the greedy doctors and hospitals will make money on mutilating baby boys. Why not remove the labia of infant girls while we are at it? That is soft tissue which is possibly subjected to more infections. Oh no, the outcry by the American women would be overwhelming but these same women have no thoughts when it comes to mutilating their boys and causing them pain and loss in sexual sensitivity. Circumcision should be left to the individual to choose. I am not circumcised and it is one of the few good things my parents ever did for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again the greedy doctors and hospitals will make money on mutilating baby boys. Why not remove the labia of infant girls while we are at it? That is soft tissue which is possibly subjected to more infections. Oh no, the outcry by the American women would be overwhelming but these same women have no thoughts when it comes to mutilating their boys and causing them pain and loss in sexual sensitivity. Circumcision should be left to the individual to choose. I am not circumcised and it is one of the few good things my parents ever did for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209842</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209842</guid>
		<description>I know that anybody can pretend to be anybody online; but I am actually a real doctor with a real practice who sees real pregnant women who ask me about circumcision for their soon-to-be-born sons.

I don&#039;t believe in routine neonatal circumcision, and will never perform that procedure.

The studies presented in this extremely biased and ill-informed article don&#039;t lead ANY doctor to think that circumcision is the answer to HIV (education and empowerment is the answer to HIV).

While a baby is unable to make his own decisions it is up to us to make decisions for him in his best interests.

It is NOT in his best interests to perform a surgical excision of his foreskin, exposing him to complications including excessive bleeding (sometimes requiring transfusions), overwhelming infection and damage to the surrounding structures (it is not all that uncommon in the USA to have baby boys with damaged urethra from botched circumcisions).
Unless you expect your baby boy to be having unprotected vaginal sex any time soon, circumcision isn&#039;t even a question. (and if you genuinely believe that study - that circumcision is the best way to prevent HIV-  your son can make the choice to have an elective circumcision when he is approaching the age when he might be having unprotected sex).

Parents would be far better to wait ten years and put time and effort into honest and accurate sex education rather than to subject their sons to an operation with many known disadvantages and many serious risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that anybody can pretend to be anybody online; but I am actually a real doctor with a real practice who sees real pregnant women who ask me about circumcision for their soon-to-be-born sons.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe in routine neonatal circumcision, and will never perform that procedure.</p>
<p>The studies presented in this extremely biased and ill-informed article don&#8217;t lead ANY doctor to think that circumcision is the answer to HIV (education and empowerment is the answer to HIV).</p>
<p>While a baby is unable to make his own decisions it is up to us to make decisions for him in his best interests.</p>
<p>It is NOT in his best interests to perform a surgical excision of his foreskin, exposing him to complications including excessive bleeding (sometimes requiring transfusions), overwhelming infection and damage to the surrounding structures (it is not all that uncommon in the USA to have baby boys with damaged urethra from botched circumcisions).<br />
Unless you expect your baby boy to be having unprotected vaginal sex any time soon, circumcision isn&#8217;t even a question. (and if you genuinely believe that study &#8211; that circumcision is the best way to prevent HIV-  your son can make the choice to have an elective circumcision when he is approaching the age when he might be having unprotected sex).</p>
<p>Parents would be far better to wait ten years and put time and effort into honest and accurate sex education rather than to subject their sons to an operation with many known disadvantages and many serious risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209755</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disappointed though not surprised that this absurdist piece of journalism hasn&#039;t been taken down yet after a consistant stream of extremely negative response, save for a few &quot;Phsaw, uncut is ugly anyway&quot; valley gays. It&#039;s for the benefit of your repute, not ours that we voice our opinions, Editors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed though not surprised that this absurdist piece of journalism hasn&#8217;t been taken down yet after a consistant stream of extremely negative response, save for a few &#8220;Phsaw, uncut is ugly anyway&#8221; valley gays. It&#8217;s for the benefit of your repute, not ours that we voice our opinions, Editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209589</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209589</guid>
		<description>Incredibly IRRESPONSIBLE article, queerty.  Normally I enjoy your thought-provoking, almost tabloid-y headlines that overstate the points of your articles.  That&#039;s fine for celeb trash, but when it comes to something as serious as HIV, shame on you.

I am uncircumcised and have to deal with ignorant people like you who half-read and half-understand the results of a study like this and therefore jump to the conclusion that since I&#039;m uncircumcised I have a higher chance of having HIV. FALSE. I have never been unsafe in my life. And as you point out, even if I were this study wouldn&#039;t apply.  It&#039;s ridiculous.  I&#039;ve definitely had people bring it up with me in the bedroom - and while ignorance is ignorance - it&#039;s hard to blame them when there is such unhelpful and misleading crap like this on the Internet.

If you want to consider yourselves true &quot;journalists,&quot; I would recommend taking this article down.  Or at least changing the headline so it&#039;s less tabloid-y and gets to the hard facts sooner.  

As you know the majority of your readers only glance at these things, so it&#039;s really a travesty if you&#039;re teaching even ONE person false information in your quest to make &quot;thought provoking&quot; sensational claims.

Also keep in mind that Google only caches the first part of your stories...No one bothers to get to the end of the article to get your qualification about gay people.

Scare tactics, queerty, really?  Shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly IRRESPONSIBLE article, queerty.  Normally I enjoy your thought-provoking, almost tabloid-y headlines that overstate the points of your articles.  That&#8217;s fine for celeb trash, but when it comes to something as serious as HIV, shame on you.</p>
<p>I am uncircumcised and have to deal with ignorant people like you who half-read and half-understand the results of a study like this and therefore jump to the conclusion that since I&#8217;m uncircumcised I have a higher chance of having HIV. FALSE. I have never been unsafe in my life. And as you point out, even if I were this study wouldn&#8217;t apply.  It&#8217;s ridiculous.  I&#8217;ve definitely had people bring it up with me in the bedroom &#8211; and while ignorance is ignorance &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to blame them when there is such unhelpful and misleading crap like this on the Internet.</p>
<p>If you want to consider yourselves true &#8220;journalists,&#8221; I would recommend taking this article down.  Or at least changing the headline so it&#8217;s less tabloid-y and gets to the hard facts sooner.  </p>
<p>As you know the majority of your readers only glance at these things, so it&#8217;s really a travesty if you&#8217;re teaching even ONE person false information in your quest to make &#8220;thought provoking&#8221; sensational claims.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that Google only caches the first part of your stories&#8230;No one bothers to get to the end of the article to get your qualification about gay people.</p>
<p>Scare tactics, queerty, really?  Shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperCat</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209523</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209523</guid>
		<description>Since when is it a good idea to cut off part of your penis?!

 Why would you want a knife anywhere near your penis.

 This is mutilating babies, plain and simple. I don&#039;t even approve of it for religious reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when is it a good idea to cut off part of your penis?!</p>
<p> Why would you want a knife anywhere near your penis.</p>
<p> This is mutilating babies, plain and simple. I don&#8217;t even approve of it for religious reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osocubano</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209493</link>
		<dc:creator>osocubano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209493</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just really glad I got to keep all my skin, and met lots of fetishists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just really glad I got to keep all my skin, and met lots of fetishists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgz</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209477</link>
		<dc:creator>dgz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209477</guid>
		<description>A THEORY:  if circumcision reduces sensation, and there&#039;s a significant recovery period...  couldn&#039;t that mean that those men had sex less often, with fewer partners?  this would also lead to a decrease in HIV infection, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A THEORY:  if circumcision reduces sensation, and there&#8217;s a significant recovery period&#8230;  couldn&#8217;t that mean that those men had sex less often, with fewer partners?  this would also lead to a decrease in HIV infection, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zee</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209457</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209457</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209455&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zee&lt;/a&gt;: 
what i meant with it&#039;s not painful was, it&#039;s not any more painful for a child than an adult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209455" rel="nofollow">Zee</a>:<br />
what i meant with it&#8217;s not painful was, it&#8217;s not any more painful for a child than an adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zee</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209455</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209455</guid>
		<description>If this is their argument, how about waiting with the procedure until the boy comes of age? It&#039;s not painful in adulthood, and that way the person who owns the body - the person that will be living with the damage for the rest of his life will get to chose. The parents have no say in this matter if you ask me. And last time i checked infants are not sexually active...

For the cleanliness part: If your willy gets THAT dirty between each time you take a bath; do it more often...

- Vincent Zee, happy uncircumcised male in his 20&#039;s ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is their argument, how about waiting with the procedure until the boy comes of age? It&#8217;s not painful in adulthood, and that way the person who owns the body &#8211; the person that will be living with the damage for the rest of his life will get to chose. The parents have no say in this matter if you ask me. And last time i checked infants are not sexually active&#8230;</p>
<p>For the cleanliness part: If your willy gets THAT dirty between each time you take a bath; do it more often&#8230;</p>
<p>- Vincent Zee, happy uncircumcised male in his 20&#8242;s ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209454</link>
		<dc:creator>mark snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209454</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209144&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shawn&lt;/a&gt;: Agreed, thank you! NO to circumcision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209144" rel="nofollow">Shawn</a>: Agreed, thank you! NO to circumcision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209451</link>
		<dc:creator>rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209451</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209443&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kiwi&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Uncut penis is ugly anyways&quot;
Maybe you should only have sex in the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209443" rel="nofollow">Kiwi</a>: &#8220;Uncut penis is ugly anyways&#8221;<br />
Maybe you should only have sex in the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209443</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209443</guid>
		<description>Uncut penis is ugly anyways, it looks like a droopy banana with the peel rotting off.  

&quot;It should be the child&#039;s choice&quot;

What a weak argument, some people who are adults don&#039;t agree with inoculations, yet they are vaccinated as youths by their parents will.  I guess we should stop immunizing babies because they may not agree with the procedure 25 years down the road!  It&#039;s up to the parents to decide what is best for their child and I support any parents right to circumsize their child and stop him from living a life with an ugly wiener. 

And for those preaching mutilation, T-Taping your cock under ones pants isn&#039;t exactly natural nor healthy either, way to be a bunch of raging, bad sex having hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncut penis is ugly anyways, it looks like a droopy banana with the peel rotting off.  </p>
<p>&#8220;It should be the child&#8217;s choice&#8221;</p>
<p>What a weak argument, some people who are adults don&#8217;t agree with inoculations, yet they are vaccinated as youths by their parents will.  I guess we should stop immunizing babies because they may not agree with the procedure 25 years down the road!  It&#8217;s up to the parents to decide what is best for their child and I support any parents right to circumsize their child and stop him from living a life with an ugly wiener. </p>
<p>And for those preaching mutilation, T-Taping your cock under ones pants isn&#8217;t exactly natural nor healthy either, way to be a bunch of raging, bad sex having hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209439</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209439</guid>
		<description>My boyfriend is cut. No, he (unlike the other, uncut ones) cannot come unless with his own deathgrip, and yes, it was a very traumatic procedure for him.

Nobody in their right mind should be advocating circumcision especially in the industrialised world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My boyfriend is cut. No, he (unlike the other, uncut ones) cannot come unless with his own deathgrip, and yes, it was a very traumatic procedure for him.</p>
<p>Nobody in their right mind should be advocating circumcision especially in the industrialised world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TikiHead</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209422</link>
		<dc:creator>TikiHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209422</guid>
		<description>I am stunned at the sheer number of superb amateur clinicians to be found Queerty comments.

Wowsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stunned at the sheer number of superb amateur clinicians to be found Queerty comments.</p>
<p>Wowsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209421</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209421</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209357&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John&lt;/a&gt;: The defect of foreskin you&#039;re referring to is Phimosis, it is the only condition where circumcision is the medically sound course of action, and even then they more or less trim the opening to is it larger, not taking the whole thing. To your point, anyone who has even briefly studied the accompanying photo with this article can grasp the potential for error when you have a screaming, traumatized child, a tiny penis and something that resembles an extra large nail-clipper to do the job. I&#039;ve always wondered about the possibility for error with some guys whose foreskins naturally do not extend to the tip of the head, whereas others would be much easier to .. get a grip on. The barbarism of this boggles the mind. 


Sidenote, I&#039;d never thought of restoration of foreskin as anything but another repulsive body modification I want not to think about (Though it is with consent, SO power to you, boys) but after googling a little bit I&#039;m shocked with how natural the results can appear. If I were circumcised I might feel drawn to it, especially if I felt as wronged and conflicted as some of the circumcised adults who&#039;ve commented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209357" rel="nofollow">John</a>: The defect of foreskin you&#8217;re referring to is Phimosis, it is the only condition where circumcision is the medically sound course of action, and even then they more or less trim the opening to is it larger, not taking the whole thing. To your point, anyone who has even briefly studied the accompanying photo with this article can grasp the potential for error when you have a screaming, traumatized child, a tiny penis and something that resembles an extra large nail-clipper to do the job. I&#8217;ve always wondered about the possibility for error with some guys whose foreskins naturally do not extend to the tip of the head, whereas others would be much easier to .. get a grip on. The barbarism of this boggles the mind. </p>
<p>Sidenote, I&#8217;d never thought of restoration of foreskin as anything but another repulsive body modification I want not to think about (Though it is with consent, SO power to you, boys) but after googling a little bit I&#8217;m shocked with how natural the results can appear. If I were circumcised I might feel drawn to it, especially if I felt as wronged and conflicted as some of the circumcised adults who&#8217;ve commented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kropotkin</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kropotkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209409</guid>
		<description>I think circumcision should the be the person&#039;s choice when they are old enough to make that choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think circumcision should the be the person&#8217;s choice when they are old enough to make that choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anony</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209405</link>
		<dc:creator>anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209405</guid>
		<description>Wearing a condom is more effective at protecting against hiv then being circumcised. Not to mention low risk sexual behaivors generally decrease the chances of infection,


HELL TO THE MATHA FUCCN NO!!!...circumcision should NOT be made mandoraty. I am against circumcising babies. Thats a decision the individual should make themselves when older. 

The forksin contains so many nerve endings, cutting it off desentisizes the penis. Cant believe people still do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wearing a condom is more effective at protecting against hiv then being circumcised. Not to mention low risk sexual behaivors generally decrease the chances of infection,</p>
<p>HELL TO THE MATHA FUCCN NO!!!&#8230;circumcision should NOT be made mandoraty. I am against circumcising babies. Thats a decision the individual should make themselves when older. </p>
<p>The forksin contains so many nerve endings, cutting it off desentisizes the penis. Cant believe people still do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209401</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209401</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209155&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;alessandro&lt;/a&gt;: 
I feel an immense amount of pride and solidarity while reviewing these comments and seeing that nearly everyone agrees on this issue, which I genuinely did not expect. 
It would be an amazing failure in judgement if this writer is not removed for his partisan, offensive and ridiculous statements. 

Suggesting that people who advocate for infant males (who have no other protest but to scream, and they do) are merely cynical protesters and people who prefer their partners intact are &quot;fetishists&quot;. Could this man even have a journalism degree, or any degree?

&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209155" rel="nofollow">alessandro</a>:<br />
I feel an immense amount of pride and solidarity while reviewing these comments and seeing that nearly everyone agrees on this issue, which I genuinely did not expect.<br />
It would be an amazing failure in judgement if this writer is not removed for his partisan, offensive and ridiculous statements. </p>
<p>Suggesting that people who advocate for infant males (who have no other protest but to scream, and they do) are merely cynical protesters and people who prefer their partners intact are &#8220;fetishists&#8221;. Could this man even have a journalism degree, or any degree?</p>
<p>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209389</link>
		<dc:creator>M Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209389</guid>
		<description>There is a debate, and clearly you havn&#039;t read anything prior.
 I don&#039;t know why people can be so cavalier about AIDS, such that a minor procedure which renders people less sensitive rarely ,according to the CDC, gives you fits. 
a babies nervous system is hardly even begun development and a number of minor surgeries are performed without anesthesia. The fact is that a male&#039;s nervous system isn&#039;t complete until they are 25 yrs&#039; old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a debate, and clearly you havn&#8217;t read anything prior.<br />
 I don&#8217;t know why people can be so cavalier about AIDS, such that a minor procedure which renders people less sensitive rarely ,according to the CDC, gives you fits.<br />
a babies nervous system is hardly even begun development and a number of minor surgeries are performed without anesthesia. The fact is that a male&#8217;s nervous system isn&#8217;t complete until they are 25 yrs&#8217; old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesnimmo</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209372</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesnimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209372</guid>
		<description>The baby at the top of this story does NOT look happy at being mutilated!  How can ANY reputable surgeon be perfoming this operation WITHOUT the requirement of anesthesia as would be used during ANY adult&#039;s operation.

Would a full grown man undergo this operation without anesthesia
as is COMMON for babies?

Circumcision is barbaric, no debate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The baby at the top of this story does NOT look happy at being mutilated!  How can ANY reputable surgeon be perfoming this operation WITHOUT the requirement of anesthesia as would be used during ANY adult&#8217;s operation.</p>
<p>Would a full grown man undergo this operation without anesthesia<br />
as is COMMON for babies?</p>
<p>Circumcision is barbaric, no debate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209370</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209370</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209214&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rrr&lt;/a&gt;: @rrr: I couldn&#039;t imagine anyone thinking I was serious about a mastectomy.

In every other case, performing elective surgery without informed consent is considered grossly unethical or illegal. So someone claims HIV spread might be reduced 50% if babies are circumcised. So what? Wear a condom and reduce risk the other 50% as well. Why trust that study anyway?

And what&#039;s with the pro-circumcision fetish anyway? So many like to dismiss the foreskin as some useless little flap of skin, snip and it&#039;s gone. Look at the photo again. That baby is being tortured. &lt;a href=&quot;http://nocirc.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nocirc.org&lt;/a&gt; is a great resource to learn why to not circumcise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209214" rel="nofollow">rrr</a>: @rrr: I couldn&#8217;t imagine anyone thinking I was serious about a mastectomy.</p>
<p>In every other case, performing elective surgery without informed consent is considered grossly unethical or illegal. So someone claims HIV spread might be reduced 50% if babies are circumcised. So what? Wear a condom and reduce risk the other 50% as well. Why trust that study anyway?</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s with the pro-circumcision fetish anyway? So many like to dismiss the foreskin as some useless little flap of skin, snip and it&#8217;s gone. Look at the photo again. That baby is being tortured. <a href="http://nocirc.org/" rel="nofollow">nocirc.org</a> is a great resource to learn why to not circumcise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209357</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209357</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it should be up to the person who owns the Penis whether to be circumcised or not. I hate the idea that my parents made that decision for me without my consent. I&#039;ve done some research on it. Something that no one has brought up in the comments. If the doctor cuts a little too much off, there is not enough skin for normal erections, so the Penis ends up curving. Ever been with a circumcised guy who&#039;s dick curved when he got hard? That&#039;s generally why. 

Look through photos of botched circumcisions, it&#039;s pretty terrible. I got lucky and the doc didn&#039;t cut that much off, but I have always wondered what kind of sensations I&#039;d have if I still had the full foreskin. On the other hand, I was with a guy once who&#039;s foreskin wouldn&#039;t retract all the way. He was always in pain he told me, and very smelly. So there you go, an argument for it. But regardless of whether it&#039;s good or not, it should ALWAYS be up to the person themselves, not someone else. ALWAYS. It is WRONG for someone to decide for you what is right for your body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it should be up to the person who owns the Penis whether to be circumcised or not. I hate the idea that my parents made that decision for me without my consent. I&#8217;ve done some research on it. Something that no one has brought up in the comments. If the doctor cuts a little too much off, there is not enough skin for normal erections, so the Penis ends up curving. Ever been with a circumcised guy who&#8217;s dick curved when he got hard? That&#8217;s generally why. </p>
<p>Look through photos of botched circumcisions, it&#8217;s pretty terrible. I got lucky and the doc didn&#8217;t cut that much off, but I have always wondered what kind of sensations I&#8217;d have if I still had the full foreskin. On the other hand, I was with a guy once who&#8217;s foreskin wouldn&#8217;t retract all the way. He was always in pain he told me, and very smelly. So there you go, an argument for it. But regardless of whether it&#8217;s good or not, it should ALWAYS be up to the person themselves, not someone else. ALWAYS. It is WRONG for someone to decide for you what is right for your body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209355</guid>
		<description>A few things: while circumcision has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV, a condom is infinitely more effective. If we&#039;re talking about reducing the spread in vulnerable, poor countries, why are we contemplating a costly procedure? The doctors that we can get at these poor locations could probably have much better things to do than snip, snip, snip, when a simple, cheap condom could do the trick. 

Secondly, where money and doctors are at a premium, it doesn&#039;t make sense to employ surgery where there may not be proper follow-up care. What about the guys who get infections? What about guys with complications, needing follow-up care? What about all the people who need real treatment, for real problems? With limited resources, what&#039;s there should be used as effectively as possible. Circumcising people is not an effective use of those resources. Opportunity cost, people. 

There&#039;s really no need to use this kind of medical procedure when a combination of education and condoms would do the trick. If people don&#039;t know what HIV is and what causes it, a 50% reduced risk isn&#039;t going to help them much if they&#039;re employing risky behavior. Behavior needs to change -- people who aren&#039;t having safe sex need to start having safe sex. 

American scientists try so hard to justify circumcision, when in reality there&#039;s almost no medical reason for it -- and the new research on circumcision and HIV just isn&#039;t compelling enough to warrant circumcising half of Africa (and beyond) over it. Just work on teaching about STDs and making sure condoms are available everywhere - that will be far more effective in the long run, whilst using human kind&#039;s limited resources most effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few things: while circumcision has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV, a condom is infinitely more effective. If we&#8217;re talking about reducing the spread in vulnerable, poor countries, why are we contemplating a costly procedure? The doctors that we can get at these poor locations could probably have much better things to do than snip, snip, snip, when a simple, cheap condom could do the trick. </p>
<p>Secondly, where money and doctors are at a premium, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to employ surgery where there may not be proper follow-up care. What about the guys who get infections? What about guys with complications, needing follow-up care? What about all the people who need real treatment, for real problems? With limited resources, what&#8217;s there should be used as effectively as possible. Circumcising people is not an effective use of those resources. Opportunity cost, people. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s really no need to use this kind of medical procedure when a combination of education and condoms would do the trick. If people don&#8217;t know what HIV is and what causes it, a 50% reduced risk isn&#8217;t going to help them much if they&#8217;re employing risky behavior. Behavior needs to change &#8212; people who aren&#8217;t having safe sex need to start having safe sex. </p>
<p>American scientists try so hard to justify circumcision, when in reality there&#8217;s almost no medical reason for it &#8212; and the new research on circumcision and HIV just isn&#8217;t compelling enough to warrant circumcising half of Africa (and beyond) over it. Just work on teaching about STDs and making sure condoms are available everywhere &#8211; that will be far more effective in the long run, whilst using human kind&#8217;s limited resources most effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyler</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209353</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209353</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209273&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hampton&lt;/a&gt;: 

Hampton for President!!  Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209273" rel="nofollow">Hampton</a>: </p>
<p>Hampton for President!!  Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyler</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209349</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209349</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209187&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tarcash&lt;/a&gt;: 

Puh-lease!  I&#039;m circumcised as are most guys in the U.S.  Do any of us remember it?  No.  Snip it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209187" rel="nofollow">Tarcash</a>: </p>
<p>Puh-lease!  I&#8217;m circumcised as are most guys in the U.S.  Do any of us remember it?  No.  Snip it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209347</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209347</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209149&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tom D Frog&lt;/a&gt;: 

and educating the world on HIV/AIDS for over 25 years has worked so well.  People don&#039;t listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209149" rel="nofollow">Tom D Frog</a>: </p>
<p>and educating the world on HIV/AIDS for over 25 years has worked so well.  People don&#8217;t listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209339</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209339</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209332&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nobody&lt;/a&gt;: I agree, but I more mad at the doctor than my parents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209332" rel="nofollow">Nobody</a>: I agree, but I more mad at the doctor than my parents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209332</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209332</guid>
		<description>Fuck no. It&#039;s my body and I&#039;m still annoyed that my parents had the audacity to cut off part of my dick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck no. It&#8217;s my body and I&#8217;m still annoyed that my parents had the audacity to cut off part of my dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209327</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209327</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-209246&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rayne&lt;/a&gt;: How sad that you made that decision, based on something so rare, he stood a better chance of getting a botched circumcision, also, if you do not clean a cut penis, it will get infected too, showers clean, circumicsion does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-209246" rel="nofollow">Rayne</a>: How sad that you made that decision, based on something so rare, he stood a better chance of getting a botched circumcision, also, if you do not clean a cut penis, it will get infected too, showers clean, circumicsion does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff K.</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209316</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If being cut reduced sensation all that much we&#039;d have all these cut men screaming &quot;I can&#039;t cum.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I can&#039;t. At least not during normal sex. Only while masturbating.
I was hoping to leave that detail out, but oh well. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If being cut reduced sensation all that much we&#8217;d have all these cut men screaming &#8220;I can&#8217;t cum.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t. At least not during normal sex. Only while masturbating.<br />
I was hoping to leave that detail out, but oh well. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209315</link>
		<dc:creator>M Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209315</guid>
		<description>p.s. @Jack: the CD C reported that in afew cases there was decreased sensativity to fine touch in adults who had been circumcised; in a few cases sex was less satisfying in most it made little or no difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. @Jack: the CD C reported that in afew cases there was decreased sensativity to fine touch in adults who had been circumcised; in a few cases sex was less satisfying in most it made little or no difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209311</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209311</guid>
		<description>I have FORESKIN. I don&#039;t have AIDS. I use rubbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have FORESKIN. I don&#8217;t have AIDS. I use rubbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qjersey</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209307</link>
		<dc:creator>Qjersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209307</guid>
		<description>If you rely on Queerty for your HIV/AIDS information...well I feel sorry for you. 

It&#039;s a medical solution to a behavioral problem, it&#039;s that simple. 

If being cut reduced sensation all that much we&#039;d have all these cut men screaming &quot;I can&#039;t cum.&quot; 

Any mention of circumcision always brings out the cranks. 

and BTW, it&#039;s not the &quot;FIRST national HIV Prevention conference&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you rely on Queerty for your HIV/AIDS information&#8230;well I feel sorry for you. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a medical solution to a behavioral problem, it&#8217;s that simple. </p>
<p>If being cut reduced sensation all that much we&#8217;d have all these cut men screaming &#8220;I can&#8217;t cum.&#8221; </p>
<p>Any mention of circumcision always brings out the cranks. </p>
<p>and BTW, it&#8217;s not the &#8220;FIRST national HIV Prevention conference&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarxien</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209304</link>
		<dc:creator>tarxien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209304</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth noting that the death rate from male circumcision is significant, especially in Africa where the procedure is performed by people who are not medically trained, in non-sterile conditions and there is little access to antibiotics and blood transfusion. Most deaths are from infection and haemorrhage. There is also a significant mortality rate in the USA where this operation is often done for non-medical reasons. I do not believe the figures - 50% reduction in Aids mortality with circumcision. Where do these figures come from? The incidence of HIV is low in the UK/Europe (circumcision very rare) in comparison with South Africa, for example, where most men are circumcised for tribal reasons. In South Africa about 25% of the population has HIV, 85% of the men are circumcised. The figures just don&#039;t add up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that the death rate from male circumcision is significant, especially in Africa where the procedure is performed by people who are not medically trained, in non-sterile conditions and there is little access to antibiotics and blood transfusion. Most deaths are from infection and haemorrhage. There is also a significant mortality rate in the USA where this operation is often done for non-medical reasons. I do not believe the figures &#8211; 50% reduction in Aids mortality with circumcision. Where do these figures come from? The incidence of HIV is low in the UK/Europe (circumcision very rare) in comparison with South Africa, for example, where most men are circumcised for tribal reasons. In South Africa about 25% of the population has HIV, 85% of the men are circumcised. The figures just don&#8217;t add up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/if-circumcision-halves-risk-of-spreading-hiv-should-all-baby-boys-get-cut-20090824/#comment-209297</link>
		<dc:creator>M Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=65246#comment-209297</guid>
		<description>@No. 39 · Jack: I&#039;m unsure as to where you got you information regarding the Clitoretomy FGM, however , as the name would suggest, while the clitoral hood is removed that is to make removal of most or all of the clitoris possible. I knopw this for a fact from different sources , but moreso because it occures most commonly in Moslem and other African countries where the point is to keep the woman chaste and controlable.  Without being among respectable moslems or people where women are just chatel , you would have no ideas as to the extremes that are gone to to protect a woman for her husband alone. Indeed, my roommate from libya was prevented from even seeing his bride to be utill after marriage. Women who commit adultery are killed--I even watched a film of the man being beheaded and she shot-in Mecca, not that long ago.
It is practiced in 28 countries in Africa. It is ancient and has nothing to do with cleanliness, only keeping women in line. Someone has been feeding you a line; if they can&#039;t feel anything, why chase men.

You may be right about  enhanced pleasure, but I would rather not have AIDS than enhanced pleasure and get sick.
You don&#039;t of course miss what you don&#039;t have(I appreciate the metaphor) I know that I would rather be scalped than wearing a raincoat. (sorry mixed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@No. 39 · Jack: I&#8217;m unsure as to where you got you information regarding the Clitoretomy FGM, however , as the name would suggest, while the clitoral hood is removed that is to make removal of most or all of the clitoris possible. I knopw this for a fact from different sources , but moreso because it occures most commonly in Moslem and other African countries where the point is to keep the woman chaste and controlable.  Without being among respectable moslems or people where women are just chatel , you would have no ideas as to the extremes that are gone to to protect a woman for her husband alone. Indeed, my roommate from libya was prevented from even seeing his bride to be utill after marriage. Women who commit adultery are killed&#8211;I even watched a film of the man being beheaded and she shot-in Mecca, not that long ago.<br />
It is practiced in 28 countries in Africa. It is ancient and has nothing to do with cleanliness, only keeping women in line. Someone has been feeding you a line; if they can&#8217;t feel anything, why chase men.</p>
<p>You may be right about  enhanced pleasure, but I would rather not have AIDS than enhanced pleasure and get sick.<br />
You don&#8217;t of course miss what you don&#8217;t have(I appreciate the metaphor) I know that I would rather be scalped than wearing a raincoat. (sorry mixed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

