Insane WorldNetDaily Columnist Compares GLAAD’s Tactics To Nazi “Hate Branding”
The Hate label has been affixed to an array of conservative luminaries recently. The newest enemies list of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, GLAAD, is a who’s-who of respected leaders and journalists: Chuck Colson, Robert George, Joseph Farah, Albert Mohler, Don Wildmon and Tony Perkins are just a few of the names…
The carefully cultivated Hate brand is a big seller among marginally informed youth who quickly process whom to heed and whom to dismiss. This volunteer sales force moves throughout the nation with whistleblowing at speeches, interruption of church services, heckling and predictable “H8? protest signs. Demanding the “hater” lose his/her job ups the ante. Online petitions keep the pressure high. And of course, the N.Y. Times, Huffington Post, MSNBC and others will feature Hate product press releases verbatim.
Recognize this? Hate branding, focusing on Jews, succeeded in branding them as the “enemy” in public opinion in Nazi Germany. It’s the method used today by Islamic radicals who spread ludicrous fables about Jews in many mosques…
We have to call this what it is—an attempt at revolution. We need to come up with a no-nonsense response. I am of course not advocating anything abusive or violent. Unlike our ideological opponents, we tend to play by the rules, which is why truly honorable people are easy targets.”
Homophobic hag Linda Harvey, president of SPLC-certified hate group Mission:America, thinks that GLAAD does what it does out of spite for Christian conservatives and not out of love for its fellow gay people.
Photo via Mario Sanchez Prada
And by the way, Queerty:
F I R S T !
Sorry, I couldn’t resists. I’ve always wanted to know what it felt like to do that.
·
Interesting post, but why do you need to resort to ad hominem attacks and call her
a “hag?” It just makes all of us gay men look petty. It’s like when people attack
Maggie Gallagher for her weight, aren’t there far more substantive defects in her
behavior to attack?
·
Its always so funny how the haters always accuse everyone else of being haters
·
The difference being the Jews in Germany weren’t out attacking Germans and demanding that they not be given rights.
Not letting you attack me, isn’t me committing a hate crime against you.
Seriously, these people are idiots.
·
Substitute “Christian” wherever the story says “Nazi”, and substitute “Gay” where it says “Jew”, and you might have something close to the truth. The Nazi’s stirred up hate against Jews by blaming the Jews for all of Germany’s problems. The “Christians” stir up hate against Gays by blaming the Gays for all of America’s problems…. Part of casting blame is claiming that “Christians” are the victims.
(Notice that “Christian” is in quotes. Not all real Christians are trying to stir up hate against gays. I know some real, good Christian people. Most of them attend the MCC church every week.)
·
“The Hate label has been affixed to an array of conservative luminaries recently.”
Well, they weren’t really luminaries until they got glitter bombed. You should thank those radical queens for making shining shimmering stars out of those black holes of humanity.
“The carefully cultivated Hate brand is a big seller among marginally informed youth who quickly process whom to heed and whom to dismiss.”
Carefully cultivated? Oh honey, trust me. We no longer found the need to cultivate the moment religious zealots decided to brand us as a detriment to morality. Thank you for cultivating the “Hate” brand for us.
“This volunteer sales force moves throughout the nation with whistleblowing at speeches, interruption of church services, heckling and predictable “H8? protest signs. Demanding the “hater” lose his/her job ups the ante.”
Now that you mentioned it, sweetheart, I think you’re on to something. Interrupting church services? Heckling? Whistleblowing? Why, I can just imagine you thinking that those methods are for amateurs considering what homophobes have done. Maybe the LGBT should also consider passing laws like the “death to the gays” law of Uganda. Maybe we should also orchestrate the mass murder of morons similar to what the Nazi’s did to the LGBT within their territory. LOL. Sorry we can’t be as violent. Most of us use the brains that “God” supposedly gave us instead of just mindlessly following a book that was never proven to be written by him to begin with. We figured since you guys won’t use your brains, we might as well take the advantage.
“Recognize this? Hate branding, focusing on Jews, succeeded in branding them as the “enemy” in public opinion in Nazi Germany. It’s the method used today by Islamic radicals who spread ludicrous fables about Jews in many mosques.”
…And the moronic preachers of Africa as well as those laughable imbeciles at the Middle East thereby causing the gay hate to allow the passing of laws which yield the numerous deaths of many LGBT.
But since you brought that up, let me ask you this, doll: how come your kind has yet to succeed with the hate-mongering despite so many years of trying? Maybe it’s because you are preaching in a country that already got fed up with the hypocritical nonsense of the radical right. Or maybe you’re just not that good at inciting hate because deep down you know that you’re wrong.
“We have to call this what it is—an attempt at revolution. We need to come up with a no-nonsense response.”
No-nonsense? How can YOU and YOUR kind do that when the mere fact that you’re hating on the LGBT is already one of the highest forms of nonsensical behavior? Don’t try to hard, sweetheart. You might end up popping a vein.
“Unlike our ideological opponents, we tend to play by the rules,”
Oh, you mean like one of the 10 Commandments: Thou shall not kill (broken by primitive countries like Africa, the Middleast and a throng of gay bashers in the West)
or like that age old Christian law of love your neighbor as you love your self (Oh yes. We feel so much love from you people.)
I wish we too can call your kind ideological, miss. Unfortunately, we would like to at least follow one commandment. You know, the one about “not lying.”
“which is why truly honorable people are easy targets.”
So I’m guessing Ann Coulter is not such an honorable person since she was able to dodge that pie thrown at her before. Damn. And here I was thinking she was just tapping into the mutation that must’ve wiped out majority of her brain cells.
But don’t fret. I’m sure Rick Santorum is still honorable given how easy it was for some radical queens to bomb his face and make him one of your many conservative luminaries.