Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  legislative locks

Is New Mexico’s 816-Page ‘Everything But Marriage’ Bill Destined to Fail? 8 Ball Says Yes

New Mexico’s “everything but marriage” domestic partnerships bill appears to be dying a slow death, as lawmakers push it to a third committee for review.

With Gov. Bill Richardson demanding state senators vote on the bill, it now needs to make its way out of two committees (it already cleared one), then score approval by the entire Senate floor, plus the Assembly — all within the next 15 days, when the state’s legislative session expires. Says Democratic Sen. Eric Griego: “Three committee assignments would kill this bill.” So too might its length: The bill is 816 pages.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Feb 4, 2010
Tagged: , ,
4 Comments

Picture of rainfish2000
No. 1 · rainfish2000 · Member · 164 comments

As Sen. John McCain might say [insert sarcasm here]: The laws the discriminate against hard working, tax paying, GLBT American citizens are working! They are effective! Let’s not change anything!

Posted: Feb 5, 2010 at 2:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
Picture of Steve
No. 2 · Steve

More than 800 pages? To (almost, but not quite) do something that should rightfully be done (completely) in one page? That just doesn’t seem right.

Posted: Feb 5, 2010 at 7:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
Picture of David
No. 3 · David

I live in NM. The truth is that Governor Richardson is not doing anything to throw some weight behind this measure. He has pro forma requested introduction of this legislation many times but has never chosen to spend any political capital to get the bill passed. It’s all for show.

Posted: Feb 6, 2010 at 9:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
Picture of Patrick Garies
No. 4 · Patrick Garies

@Steve: From what I’ve read, unlike other everything-but-”marriage” bills, this one specifically enumerates every right you have so that there’s no ambiguity that you have “everything-but-’marriage’”. Presumably, that’s to deal with situations where it is not “everything-but-’marriage’” in practice like in States such as New Jersey and the reason for the length.

Posted: Feb 8, 2010 at 12:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY