Jim McG Builds Up Defenses Ahead of Trial
Get excited, readers! The McGreevey divorce trial begins this week and we can be sure to hear all sorts of salacious, nauseating details of how the former NJ Governor and his Missus got down in the bedroom.
Dina Matos-McGreevey alleges that hubby Jim duped her into marriage by lying about being a bit bent. Jim McGreevey’s lawyer, Stephen Haller, has already leaked how they’ll be contesting Dina’s allegations. And it ain’t pretty:
Plaintiff [Mr. McGreevey] will testify at trial that he needed to have a disrobed male present in the room with them when the parties had sexual relations in order to maintain an erection.
…
This tends to prove that plaintiff was at least bisexual, a fact which should have been obvious to defendant prior to the marriage.
Will the day come when we’re not fascinated by disgraced politicians’ penises? Probably not. Or, at least, we hope not!
It is gonna be ugly!
http://www.ilovezeren.com/2008.....-they.html
McSleazy has no shame. Anyway we can excommunicate him? The man admitted in his biography that he lied to both of his wives. Moreover, he committed adultery when he supposed to be in a monogamous relationship. Cheating on his wife hours after she gave birth to his child? Gross!
The weasel is a sociopath. He wanted power and used women to get it, not caring that he was cheating those women out of fulfilling relationships.
In fairness, we don’t know that he was in a monogamous relationship. A wedding ring may imply monogamy to many straight people, but doesn’t mean they might not have had an understanding. And given the mounting testimony that they engaged in many 3-ways, it’s not a far stretch to consider that she knew of his other infedilities.
Not saying he isn’t totally creepy. But I don’t think she’s exactly a martyr here.
Man, I would hate to be their children. Can you imagine listening to the tabloid reports about their parents’ infidelities prior to divorce?