The world is a very very very big place with zillions of people in it. I'm sure there are a FEW (please note the emphasis) a FEW bi men. But most are what you say, confused.

I'm surprised you didn't mention Rimes & Sheremet have filed for divorce very recently. Seems like that indicates something. wink wink…. or perhaps it is just a coincidence.

There are NO bisexual men in this world. Just gay men, who happen to have or had sex with women. Prior marriages to women and procreating do not give one the claimed title, "bisexual." Confused, gay man, yes. Men who have sex with men and "bisexual men" need to get it through their heads. They are GAY, GAY, GAY. Deal with it.

Womyn, however, do have a true bisexual element, that only womyn can describe and relate to. It is fucking confusing with them.

Men. Really, really like dick or really, really like the female organ, once they get it figured out. There is no middle ground with men.

Are we going to have a gay poo today. How about some gay wee wee's? Oh, and I forgot my gay running shoes just in case I need to streak down the road to catch the gay train.

OMG, it's starting to rain again. That's so gay. I need my gay umbrella to stop my gay sweater from getting wet. Before I hop onto that that gay train, I'll stop at the baker's shop and buy myself a gay cream bun and a can of gay coke.

When I get to my gay office, I'll sit in front of my gay computer and put in my gay hard drive.

Notice how there's no one ever alleges that Ernest Borgnine, Michael Moore, Drew Carey or that any other unattractive fatty is gay? However if he's young and hot.."oh he's definitely gay"

I do agree that bisexual men EXIST. I'm pretty sure I knew one in college. And I have a bisexual friend in a Southern state. But my bisexual friends are mostly heterosexual men who have enjoyed gay sex occasionally. For the most part they have fallen in love with women.

Otherwise, even though it is 2009, I think many men who are probably gay still get married because (a) their family will disown them and they will lose money, a house, love, etc. if they identified as gay; (b) they want to play the success game and realize they will get raises and promotions by wearing a wedding ring; (c) they dis-identify from the gay community because they aren't "effeminate" or "lisp".

actually, in nashville, it's kind of public gossip that he is gay. i'm not saying it's true, but word around town is that when they lived here, they were always bringing home men for him

Please don't make me sleep with a woman! They don't have a penis!

I agree with Jason, and I don't believe he's causing damage to what any sensible person knows: Some people prefer only one gender over the other, be that their own or the other. It's a continuum. (I like to use that word and vacuum because they have double-Us.) Some of us are totally black (not just because it's slimming) and some of us are totally white (and not just after Labor Day), but many, many of us are one of the infinite shades of gray in the middle.

I have never wanted to be with a woman. So I'm black. Or am I white? Whatever. It don't matter if you're black or white. (Shamon!) But I digress…

I've had two close relatives who at various points in their lives have, um, found comfort in the arms of someone of their own gender. (For the record, one male and one female.) Each is now married. Do I have any doubt that they are happy in their respective marriages? Do I think they're "in denial" because they're now with someone of the opposite sex? Of course not. They're gray.

As for Sheremet, why do we care? Are we really doing a service to what we believe in by constantly trying to out people?

Not to be nosey and judgemental, but why is your man marrying all these women? Is he just completely incapable of living as an openly gay man? Do his wives know he's gay? If not, do you think that's really fair to them?

As far as the LeAnn story goes, her husband is a total FAG. The first time I saw him was when she was doing an episode of TRL, and as soon as he opened his mouth, a huge Louis Vuitton purse came flying out. Helen Keller could sense it. I'm sure she knew, but then again ahe is a little bit country.

and my 10+ years long-term man is married to a woman. he's been mine through 2 marriages to women and 2 children. it's just what some men do. i wear shorts in public, he marries women in public. we're been together through thick and thin and always will be.

there is no 'normal' for anyone unless they impose it upon themselves.

Anyway, I don't know if he's gay, but if he is then I don't blame her for cheating on him. (If indeed she did, and it seems like she did, but who knows?)

You wrote: "It's claims like these that give people the notion that we as gays can choose our orientation and set us further back in getting the public at large to see us as who we are: gay by nature, not by choice."

I can understand where you're coming from, but I think you're taking too narrow a view of the kinds of rights people (all people) should enjoy in modern society.

Your statement mirrors early efforts to secure rights for GLBT people. Those early efforts were rooted in a sense of victimhood — the argument being that if GLBT people had no say in the matter, it's unfair to ostracize them for their orientation.

Nowadays, we can be a lot more ambitious than that. It doesn't matter whether orientation is genetic or developmental, or whether it's open to a degree of control. All that matters is that adults should have the right to do or be anything that pleases them so long as it doesn't hurt other people. That's the real crux of modern civil rights, as I see it.

I know that for a person still reeling from Proposition 8, that might sound unrealistic. But I don't think it is. Proposition 8 (and other efforts like it) only represents the last hurrah of a dying breed of religious conservatives in America. The fact is, the overwhelming majority of younger Californians are too laissez-faire to care about whether a guy wants to marry another guy (or whether he wants to marry the dude while hitting a bong). In about 15-20 years' time, that laxity will become social consensus by force of human life expectancy. Macabre, perhaps, but true and uplifting at the same time.

Personally, I do believe that nearly everyone has some capacity for attraction to both sexes, and that most people have great (if untapped) capacity for it. It's not a prescription for behavior, of course — just a statement of potential.

While a boneless celebrity post is hardly the place to get into a discussion of this gravitas, I dislike people claiming that everyone is bisexual which is essentially saying that orientation is malleable, or even worse, a choice. It's claims like these that give people the notion that we as gays can choose our orientation and set us further back in getting the public at large to see us as who we are: gay by nature, not by choice.